Timothy A Heintz, Anusha Badathala, Avery Wooten, Cassandra W Cu, Alfred Wallace, Benjamin Pham, Arthur W Wallace, Julien Cobert
{"title":"Preliminary Development and Validation of Automated Nociception Recognition Using Computer Vision in Perioperative Patients.","authors":"Timothy A Heintz, Anusha Badathala, Avery Wooten, Cassandra W Cu, Alfred Wallace, Benjamin Pham, Arthur W Wallace, Julien Cobert","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective pain recognition and treatment in perioperative environments reduce length of stay and decrease risk of delirium and chronic pain. We sought to develop and validate preliminary computer vision-based approaches for nociception detection in hospitalized patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective observational cohort study using red-green-blue camera detection of perioperative patients. Adults (≥18 years) admitted for surgical procedures to the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center (SFVAMC) were included across 2 study phases: (1) algorithm development phase and (2) internal validation phase. Continuous recordings occurred perioperatively across any postoperative setting. We inputted facial images into convolutional neural networks using a pretrained backbone, to detect (1) critical care pain observation tool (CPOT) and (2) numerical rating scale (NRS). Outcomes were binary pain/no-pain. We performed external validation for CPOT and NRS classification on data from University of Northern British Columbia-McMaster University (UNBC) and Delaware Pain Database. Perturbation models were used for explainability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 130 patients for development, 77 patients for validation cohort and 25 patients from UNBC and 229 patients from Delaware datasets for external validation. Model area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic for CPOT models were 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70, 0.74) on the development cohort, 0.91 (95% CI 0.90, 0.92) on the SFVAMC validation cohort, 0.91 (0.89, 0.93) on UNBC and 0.80 (95% CI 0.75, 0.85) on Delaware. NRS model had lower performance (AUC 0.58 [95% CI 0.55, 0.61]). Brier scores improved following calibration across multiple different techniques. Perturbation models for CPOT models revealed eyebrows, nose, lips, and foreheads were most important for model prediction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated nociception detection using computer vision alone is feasible but requires additional testing and validation given small datasets used. Future multicenter observational studies are required to better understand the potential for automated continuous assessments for nociception detection in hospitalized patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005370","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Effective pain recognition and treatment in perioperative environments reduce length of stay and decrease risk of delirium and chronic pain. We sought to develop and validate preliminary computer vision-based approaches for nociception detection in hospitalized patients.
Methods: Prospective observational cohort study using red-green-blue camera detection of perioperative patients. Adults (≥18 years) admitted for surgical procedures to the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center (SFVAMC) were included across 2 study phases: (1) algorithm development phase and (2) internal validation phase. Continuous recordings occurred perioperatively across any postoperative setting. We inputted facial images into convolutional neural networks using a pretrained backbone, to detect (1) critical care pain observation tool (CPOT) and (2) numerical rating scale (NRS). Outcomes were binary pain/no-pain. We performed external validation for CPOT and NRS classification on data from University of Northern British Columbia-McMaster University (UNBC) and Delaware Pain Database. Perturbation models were used for explainability.
Results: We included 130 patients for development, 77 patients for validation cohort and 25 patients from UNBC and 229 patients from Delaware datasets for external validation. Model area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic for CPOT models were 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70, 0.74) on the development cohort, 0.91 (95% CI 0.90, 0.92) on the SFVAMC validation cohort, 0.91 (0.89, 0.93) on UNBC and 0.80 (95% CI 0.75, 0.85) on Delaware. NRS model had lower performance (AUC 0.58 [95% CI 0.55, 0.61]). Brier scores improved following calibration across multiple different techniques. Perturbation models for CPOT models revealed eyebrows, nose, lips, and foreheads were most important for model prediction.
Conclusions: Automated nociception detection using computer vision alone is feasible but requires additional testing and validation given small datasets used. Future multicenter observational studies are required to better understand the potential for automated continuous assessments for nociception detection in hospitalized patients.
期刊介绍:
With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.