Changes in Biological and Chemical Soil Properties in an Austrian Long-Term Tillage Experiment

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Heide Spiegel, Taru Sandén, Hans Sandén, Sophia Götzinger, Julia Miloczki, Ellen Kandeler
{"title":"Changes in Biological and Chemical Soil Properties in an Austrian Long-Term Tillage Experiment","authors":"Heide Spiegel,&nbsp;Taru Sandén,&nbsp;Hans Sandén,&nbsp;Sophia Götzinger,&nbsp;Julia Miloczki,&nbsp;Ellen Kandeler","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conventional tillage, including ploughing after harvest and/or for seedbed preparation, aims to incorporate crop residues and weeds and to loosen, mix and aerate the soil. However, less beneficial effects, such as a loss of soil organic carbon (SOC), are also associated with intensive tillage. This has made reduced and minimum tillage systems without ploughing increasingly popular in agriculture, contributing to soil health and climate change mitigation. We studied the effects of different tillage systems on chemical and microbial soil properties in a long-term field experiment established on a fine-sandy loamy Haplic Chernozem in Fuchsenbigl, Austria, in 1988. The tillage treatments include conventional tillage (CT) with a plough and a cultivator down to 30 cm soil depth, reduced tillage (RT) with a cultivator down to 15 cm two to three times a year, as well as minimum tillage (MT) treated with a rotary driller once a year down to 5–8 cm soil depth. In 2016, a soil sampling campaign was conducted, and alkaline phosphatase, phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs), and the nitrogen (N) mineralisation potential were analysed along with chemical properties including SOC, active C, total nitrogen (N<sub>t</sub>), CAL extractable phosphorus (P<sub>CAL</sub>) and potassium (K<sub>CAL</sub>). Under MT, these properties were significantly higher compared to CT in 0–10 cm. In deeper soil layers, these parameters showed very few significant differences between the tillage treatments. RT yielded intermediate values but not always significantly different from CT. PLFA indicators significantly correlated with SOC and, even more distinctly, with N<sub>t</sub> and active carbon. The high ratio of Gram-positive to Gram-negative bacteria indicates more recalcitrant organic matter in the top layer in MT than CT.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70037","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional tillage, including ploughing after harvest and/or for seedbed preparation, aims to incorporate crop residues and weeds and to loosen, mix and aerate the soil. However, less beneficial effects, such as a loss of soil organic carbon (SOC), are also associated with intensive tillage. This has made reduced and minimum tillage systems without ploughing increasingly popular in agriculture, contributing to soil health and climate change mitigation. We studied the effects of different tillage systems on chemical and microbial soil properties in a long-term field experiment established on a fine-sandy loamy Haplic Chernozem in Fuchsenbigl, Austria, in 1988. The tillage treatments include conventional tillage (CT) with a plough and a cultivator down to 30 cm soil depth, reduced tillage (RT) with a cultivator down to 15 cm two to three times a year, as well as minimum tillage (MT) treated with a rotary driller once a year down to 5–8 cm soil depth. In 2016, a soil sampling campaign was conducted, and alkaline phosphatase, phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs), and the nitrogen (N) mineralisation potential were analysed along with chemical properties including SOC, active C, total nitrogen (Nt), CAL extractable phosphorus (PCAL) and potassium (KCAL). Under MT, these properties were significantly higher compared to CT in 0–10 cm. In deeper soil layers, these parameters showed very few significant differences between the tillage treatments. RT yielded intermediate values but not always significantly different from CT. PLFA indicators significantly correlated with SOC and, even more distinctly, with Nt and active carbon. The high ratio of Gram-positive to Gram-negative bacteria indicates more recalcitrant organic matter in the top layer in MT than CT.

Abstract Image

奥地利长期耕作试验中土壤生物和化学性质的变化
传统耕作,包括收获后和/或苗床准备时的犁耕,旨在将作物残茬和杂草犁入土壤,并使土壤疏松、混合和通气。然而,密集耕作也会带来一些不太有益的影响,如土壤有机碳(SOC)的流失。因此,减少耕作和不耕作的最低限度耕作系统在农业中越来越受欢迎,有助于土壤健康和减缓气候变化。1988 年,我们在奥地利富森比格尔的细沙壤土 Haplic Chernozem 上进行了一项长期田间试验,研究了不同耕作制度对土壤化学和微生物特性的影响。耕作处理包括使用犁和耕地机进行的深度达 30 厘米的常规耕作(CT),使用耕地机进行的深度达 15 厘米的减量耕作(RT),每年两到三次,以及使用旋耕机进行的深度达 5-8 厘米的最小耕作(MT)。2016 年,进行了一次土壤取样活动,分析了碱性磷酸酶、磷脂脂肪酸(PLFAs)、氮(N)矿化潜力以及化学特性,包括 SOC、活性 C、全氮(Nt)、CAL 可提取磷(PCAL)和钾(KCAL)。在 MT 条件下,这些特性在 0-10 厘米处明显高于 CT。在更深的土层中,这些参数在不同耕作处理之间几乎没有显著差异。RT 产生了中间值,但并不总是与 CT 显著不同。PLFA 指标与 SOC 有明显的相关性,与 Nt 和活性碳的相关性更为明显。革兰氏阳性菌与革兰氏阴性菌的比例较高,这表明与 CT 相比,MT 的顶层有更多的难降解有机物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信