Rupert Fawdry: obstetrician whose fascination with computerised medical records soon turned to disappointment

The BMJ Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1136/bmj.r24
John Illman
{"title":"Rupert Fawdry: obstetrician whose fascination with computerised medical records soon turned to disappointment","authors":"John Illman","doi":"10.1136/bmj.r24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Obstetrician and gynaecologist Rupert Fawdry was an original thinker, dismissed by some as a Luddite and acclaimed by others as a maverick genius. If computers had been invented first, he suggested, paper and pen might have been considered the greatest IT breakthrough since the dawn of civilisation. This may seem an odd and even illogical observation by a charming eccentric who had an “affair” with the computer, according to his Canadian born first wife Judy. This passionate, obsessive affair reflected a love of structure and an overwhelming desire to organise the world—in particular, medical records. Fawdry highlighted dozens of inconsistencies in some 70 maternity datasets. The Körner model, for example, lacked an option for a breech birth by caesarean, he said, while the “place of birth” option seemed to differ in each dataset. Perhaps it was the depth of his knowledge and experience that ultimately made him appreciate the limitations of computerised medical records in obstetrics and care of the elderly. He was, despite boundless zeal, a pragmatist. He told a parliamentary committee in 2003: “Sadly, time and again, I have found myself helplessly watching the almost …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Obstetrician and gynaecologist Rupert Fawdry was an original thinker, dismissed by some as a Luddite and acclaimed by others as a maverick genius. If computers had been invented first, he suggested, paper and pen might have been considered the greatest IT breakthrough since the dawn of civilisation. This may seem an odd and even illogical observation by a charming eccentric who had an “affair” with the computer, according to his Canadian born first wife Judy. This passionate, obsessive affair reflected a love of structure and an overwhelming desire to organise the world—in particular, medical records. Fawdry highlighted dozens of inconsistencies in some 70 maternity datasets. The Körner model, for example, lacked an option for a breech birth by caesarean, he said, while the “place of birth” option seemed to differ in each dataset. Perhaps it was the depth of his knowledge and experience that ultimately made him appreciate the limitations of computerised medical records in obstetrics and care of the elderly. He was, despite boundless zeal, a pragmatist. He told a parliamentary committee in 2003: “Sadly, time and again, I have found myself helplessly watching the almost …
鲁珀特·法德里:产科医生,他对计算机医疗记录的迷恋很快变成了失望
妇产科医生鲁珀特·法德里(Rupert Fawdry)是一位具有独创性的思想家,有人认为他是勒德分子,有人则称赞他是一位特立独行的天才。他表示,如果计算机先被发明出来,纸和笔可能会被视为人类文明以来最伟大的信息技术突破。据他在加拿大出生的第一任妻子朱迪说,这似乎是一个与电脑“有染”的迷人怪人的奇怪甚至不合逻辑的观察。这种激情、痴迷的恋情反映了他对结构的热爱,以及对组织世界——尤其是医疗记录——的强烈渴望。Fawdry强调了大约70个产妇数据集中的数十个不一致之处。他说,例如,Körner模型缺乏剖腹产的臀位分娩选项,而“出生地点”选项似乎在每个数据集中都有所不同。也许正是他渊博的知识和丰富的经验,最终使他认识到计算机医疗记录在产科和老年人护理方面的局限性。尽管他有无限的热情,但他是一个实用主义者。2003年,他告诉议会委员会:“可悲的是,我一次又一次地无助地看着几乎……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信