Common Neocortical and Hippocampal Correlates of Performance Errors in a Timing Task.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Matthew R Gielow, Drew B Headley, Mohammad M Herzallah, Denis Paré
{"title":"Common Neocortical and Hippocampal Correlates of Performance Errors in a Timing Task.","authors":"Matthew R Gielow, Drew B Headley, Mohammad M Herzallah, Denis Paré","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2003-23.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to identify the neuronal correlates of performance errors in a difficult timing task. Male rats were trained to seek rewards and avoid shocks depending on the position of photic conditioned stimuli (CS-R and CS-S, respectively). Then, they were exposed to conflict trials where they had to time the interval between the CS-R and CS-S to obtain rewards while avoiding footshocks. There were pronounced individual differences in behavioral strategies on conflict trials. When presented with a CS-S, some rats quickly left the shock sector, forsaking the option of earning a reward, and rarely got shocked. Others earned rewards by delaying avoidance based on the interval between the CS-R and CS-S but were shocked more often. The probability rats would fail a given trial was not stable across trials as rats engaged in incorrect trial runs that were longer than expected by chance. Since this finding suggested that rats shift between two quasi-stable processing modes, we next examined the neuronal correlates of errors. Incorrect trials coincided with reduced firing rates in CA1 and sensory cortical neurons. Moreover, trial-to-trial variations in the firing rates of simultaneously recorded neurons were more strongly correlated on error than correct trials. Last, the power of low-frequency local field potential oscillations was higher during incorrect trials. The finding that the neuronal correlates of correct and error trials are similar in the hippocampus and neocortex lead us to hypothesize that they depend on changes in the activity of common afferents, such as neuromodulatory inputs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50114,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823390/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2003-23.2024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to identify the neuronal correlates of performance errors in a difficult timing task. Male rats were trained to seek rewards and avoid shocks depending on the position of photic conditioned stimuli (CS-R and CS-S, respectively). Then, they were exposed to conflict trials where they had to time the interval between the CS-R and CS-S to obtain rewards while avoiding footshocks. There were pronounced individual differences in behavioral strategies on conflict trials. When presented with a CS-S, some rats quickly left the shock sector, forsaking the option of earning a reward, and rarely got shocked. Others earned rewards by delaying avoidance based on the interval between the CS-R and CS-S but were shocked more often. The probability rats would fail a given trial was not stable across trials as rats engaged in incorrect trial runs that were longer than expected by chance. Since this finding suggested that rats shift between two quasi-stable processing modes, we next examined the neuronal correlates of errors. Incorrect trials coincided with reduced firing rates in CA1 and sensory cortical neurons. Moreover, trial-to-trial variations in the firing rates of simultaneously recorded neurons were more strongly correlated on error than correct trials. Last, the power of low-frequency local field potential oscillations was higher during incorrect trials. The finding that the neuronal correlates of correct and error trials are similar in the hippocampus and neocortex lead us to hypothesize that they depend on changes in the activity of common afferents, such as neuromodulatory inputs.

定时任务中常见的表现错误的新皮层和海马相关。
我们的目的是确定在一个困难的定时任务的性能错误的神经元相关。雄性大鼠被训练根据光条件刺激(CS-R和CS-S分别)的位置寻求奖励和避免电击。然后,他们被暴露在冲突试验中,他们必须安排CS-R和CS-S之间的间隔时间,以在避免脚震的同时获得奖励。在冲突试验中,行为策略存在显著的个体差异。当出现CS-S时,一些老鼠很快离开了电击区,放弃了获得奖励的选择,很少受到电击。另一些人则根据CS-R和CS-S的间隔时间延迟回避,从而获得奖励,但受到电击的次数更多。在不同的试验中,大鼠失败的概率是不稳定的,因为大鼠参与的错误试验比预期的时间要长。由于这一发现表明大鼠在两种准稳定的处理模式之间转换,我们接下来检查了错误的神经元相关性。不正确的实验与CA1和感觉皮质神经元的放电率降低相一致。此外,同时记录的神经元放电率的不同试验与错误的相关性比正确的试验更强。最后,在不正确的试验中,低频局部场电位振荡功率更高。海马和新皮层中正确和错误试验的神经元关联是相似的,这一发现使我们假设它们依赖于共同传入事件活动的变化,比如神经调节输入。我们研究了一项任务中表现错误的神经元相关性,在该任务中,大鼠必须确定奖励和刺激预测之间的间隔时间,以获得奖励,同时避免脚掌冲击。大鼠进行了错误的试验,其时间比预期的要长,这表明它们在两种准稳定的处理模式之间转换。错误试验与CA1和感觉皮质神经元的放电率下降一致。同时记录的CA1和皮质神经元的放电率在试验间的变化与错误试验的相关性比正确试验的相关性更强。在海马体和新皮层中,正确和错误试验的相关性是相似的,这一发现表明它们依赖于神经调节剂水平的共同变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience
Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1164
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: JNeurosci (ISSN 0270-6474) is an official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. It is published weekly by the Society, fifty weeks a year, one volume a year. JNeurosci publishes papers on a broad range of topics of general interest to those working on the nervous system. Authors now have an Open Choice option for their published articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信