Hearing Preservation Outcomes in 230 Consecutive Patients with Small Vestibular Schwannomas Treated with Microsurgery.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pawina Jiramongkolchai, Alexandra Vacaru, Tamara Wahlin, Marc S Schwartz, Rick A Friedman
{"title":"Hearing Preservation Outcomes in 230 Consecutive Patients with Small Vestibular Schwannomas Treated with Microsurgery.","authors":"Pawina Jiramongkolchai, Alexandra Vacaru, Tamara Wahlin, Marc S Schwartz, Rick A Friedman","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate hearing preservation (HP) outcomes for patients with small sporadic vestibular schwannomas (VS) who elect to undergo microsurgical resection.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary single-academic institution.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Individuals 18 years or older with small sporadic VS (≤15 mm) who underwent microsurgical resection from 2018 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Microsurgical resection via a middle cranial fossa (MCF) or retrosigmoid (RS) approach.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Postoperative HP (word recognition score ≥ 50%) and facial nerve function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 230 consecutive patients with small sporadic VS who elected to undergo microsurgical resection, hearing was preserved in 61% of patients. When stratified by tumor size, patients with tumors ≤10 mm had a 72% hearing preservation rate. On multivariate analysis, the most important prognostic factors for hearing preservation were the presence of preoperative vertigo (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.52) and tumor size. Patients with tumors between 0 to 5 mm and 5.1 to 10 mm had 3.62 higher odds (95% CI, 1.39-9.4) and 2.52 higher odds (95% CI, 1.30-4.9) of hearing preservation, respectively, when compared to patients with tumors that were larger than 10 mm. At the time of last follow-up, a House-Brackmann (HB) 1 or 2 was maintained in 95% (n = 218) patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Microsurgical resection for patients with small VS is associated with good hearing preservation and excellent facial nerve outcomes. Because larger tumor size portends poorer hearing outcomes, for patients who elect to undergo microsurgical resection for hearing preservation, proactive surgical intervention when tumors are ≤10 mm should be considered to increase the likelihood of hearing preservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004404","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate hearing preservation (HP) outcomes for patients with small sporadic vestibular schwannomas (VS) who elect to undergo microsurgical resection.

Study design: Retrospective study.

Setting: Tertiary single-academic institution.

Patients: Individuals 18 years or older with small sporadic VS (≤15 mm) who underwent microsurgical resection from 2018 to 2023.

Interventions: Microsurgical resection via a middle cranial fossa (MCF) or retrosigmoid (RS) approach.

Main outcome measures: Postoperative HP (word recognition score ≥ 50%) and facial nerve function.

Results: Of the 230 consecutive patients with small sporadic VS who elected to undergo microsurgical resection, hearing was preserved in 61% of patients. When stratified by tumor size, patients with tumors ≤10 mm had a 72% hearing preservation rate. On multivariate analysis, the most important prognostic factors for hearing preservation were the presence of preoperative vertigo (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.52) and tumor size. Patients with tumors between 0 to 5 mm and 5.1 to 10 mm had 3.62 higher odds (95% CI, 1.39-9.4) and 2.52 higher odds (95% CI, 1.30-4.9) of hearing preservation, respectively, when compared to patients with tumors that were larger than 10 mm. At the time of last follow-up, a House-Brackmann (HB) 1 or 2 was maintained in 95% (n = 218) patients.

Conclusions: Microsurgical resection for patients with small VS is associated with good hearing preservation and excellent facial nerve outcomes. Because larger tumor size portends poorer hearing outcomes, for patients who elect to undergo microsurgical resection for hearing preservation, proactive surgical intervention when tumors are ≤10 mm should be considered to increase the likelihood of hearing preservation.

230例连续小前庭神经鞘瘤显微手术治疗的听力保护效果。
目的:评价散发性小前庭神经鞘瘤(VS)患者显微手术切除后的听力保护效果。研究设计:回顾性研究。背景:高等院校。患者:2018 - 2023年接受显微手术切除的18岁及以上散发性小VS(≤15 mm)患者。干预措施:经中颅窝(MCF)或乙状窦后(RS)入路显微手术切除。主要观察指标:术后HP(单词识别评分≥50%)和面神经功能。结果:在连续230例选择显微手术切除的小散发性VS患者中,61%的患者保留了听力。当按肿瘤大小分层时,肿瘤≤10 mm的患者的听力保留率为72%。在多因素分析中,听力保存最重要的预后因素是术前眩晕的存在(OR, 0.33;95% CI, 0.17-0.52)和肿瘤大小。与肿瘤大于10 mm的患者相比,肿瘤在0- 5 mm和5.1 - 10 mm之间的患者听力保留的几率分别高出3.62 (95% CI, 1.39-9.4)和2.52 (95% CI, 1.30-4.9)。在最后一次随访时,95% (n = 218)患者保持House-Brackmann (HB) 1或2。结论:显微手术切除小VS患者可获得良好的听力保护和良好的面神经预后。由于肿瘤大小越大,听力效果越差,对于选择显微手术切除以保留听力的患者,应考虑肿瘤≤10 mm时的主动手术干预,以增加保留听力的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信