Patients with hard-to-heal wounds: a review and synthesis of their experiences and perceptions of maggot debridement.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Yu An Eng, Jie Yun Thian, Jeanette Ignacio
{"title":"Patients with hard-to-heal wounds: a review and synthesis of their experiences and perceptions of maggot debridement.","authors":"Yu An Eng, Jie Yun Thian, Jeanette Ignacio","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2022.0223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is little use of maggot debridement therapy (MDT) worldwide, albeit there is much literature supporting its benefits and effectiveness for hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds. Hard-to-heal wounds are becoming ever more prevalent and MDT can play a pivotal role in wound care management. This underuse can be associated with patients' perceptions and experiences of MDT. The aim of this study was to synthesise available evidence exploring the perceptions and experiences of patients with hard-to-heal wounds regarding MDT.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a systematic review of qualitative evidence using thematic synthesis. Published papers and grey literature from inception until December 2021 were identified from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection, Academic Search Complete, Web of Science, WorldWideScience.org, MedNar and Scopus. The screening process, assessment of methodological quality, and data extraction were conducted by two independent reviewers. Papers included had qualitative designs, such as phenomenology and descriptive-exploratory. Mixed methods papers and case reports were included for their qualitative components. Eligible papers were appraised using checklists from the Joanna Briggs Institute for qualitative research and case reports. Data were extracted using a standardised form. Findings were synthesised using Thomas and Harden's thematic synthesis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of six papers exploring patients' (n=67) perceptions and experiences regarding MDT were included. Some 52 findings were grouped into 11 categories, generating three synthesised findings: the complexity of living with a hard-to-heal wound and seeking help; the effects of interpersonal relationships; and the relationship between the individual and the larvae.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings of the review showed that health professionals are key drivers in encouraging patients' acceptance of MDT and enhancing their treatment experiences. Together with a patient-centric approach, patients' concerns can be effectively addressed. Public and patient education can be beneficial to address misconceptions regarding the therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"34 1","pages":"20-30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2022.0223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: There is little use of maggot debridement therapy (MDT) worldwide, albeit there is much literature supporting its benefits and effectiveness for hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds. Hard-to-heal wounds are becoming ever more prevalent and MDT can play a pivotal role in wound care management. This underuse can be associated with patients' perceptions and experiences of MDT. The aim of this study was to synthesise available evidence exploring the perceptions and experiences of patients with hard-to-heal wounds regarding MDT.

Method: This was a systematic review of qualitative evidence using thematic synthesis. Published papers and grey literature from inception until December 2021 were identified from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection, Academic Search Complete, Web of Science, WorldWideScience.org, MedNar and Scopus. The screening process, assessment of methodological quality, and data extraction were conducted by two independent reviewers. Papers included had qualitative designs, such as phenomenology and descriptive-exploratory. Mixed methods papers and case reports were included for their qualitative components. Eligible papers were appraised using checklists from the Joanna Briggs Institute for qualitative research and case reports. Data were extracted using a standardised form. Findings were synthesised using Thomas and Harden's thematic synthesis approach.

Results: A total of six papers exploring patients' (n=67) perceptions and experiences regarding MDT were included. Some 52 findings were grouped into 11 categories, generating three synthesised findings: the complexity of living with a hard-to-heal wound and seeking help; the effects of interpersonal relationships; and the relationship between the individual and the larvae.

Conclusion: Findings of the review showed that health professionals are key drivers in encouraging patients' acceptance of MDT and enhancing their treatment experiences. Together with a patient-centric approach, patients' concerns can be effectively addressed. Public and patient education can be beneficial to address misconceptions regarding the therapy.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of wound care
Journal of wound care DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice. In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers. Specifically, JWC publishes: High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信