Partial versus radical cystectomy in localized colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Bernardo Fontel Pompeu, Lucas Soares de Souza Pinto Guedes, Carlos Magno Costa Coaracy Sobrinho, Julia Hoici Brunini, Leonardo Borges, Sergio Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo, Samuel Aguiar Junior, Fernanda Bellotti Formiga
{"title":"Partial versus radical cystectomy in localized colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bernardo Fontel Pompeu, Lucas Soares de Souza Pinto Guedes, Carlos Magno Costa Coaracy Sobrinho, Julia Hoici Brunini, Leonardo Borges, Sergio Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo, Samuel Aguiar Junior, Fernanda Bellotti Formiga","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04367-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Locally advanced colorectal tumors frequently invade adjacent organs, particularly the urinary bladder in the sigmoid colon and upper rectum, complicating multivisceral resections. This study compared postoperative outcomes of partial cystectomy (PC) and total cystectomy (TC) in patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Central Register of Clinical Trials, and Web of Science for studies published up to November 2024. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with I<sup>2</sup> statistics. Statistical analyses were performed in R Software 4.4.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine retrospective studies including 894 patients were analyzed. Among them, 433 (48.43%) underwent PC, and 461 (51.57%) underwent TC. Compared to TC, PC was associated with significantly lower rates of surgical site infection (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.13-0.80; p = 0.015), shorter operative time (MD - 169.7 min; 95% CI - 214.1 to - 125.3; p < 0.01), reduced blood loss (MD - 1005.9 ml; 95% CI - 1362.1 to - 649.8; p < 0.01), and shorter hospital stay (MD - 6.6 days; 95% CI - 9.4 to - 3.9; p < 0.01). No significant differences were observed between groups in local or distant recurrence, urinary and intestinal leaks, pelvic abscess, ileus, urinary tract infection, or 90-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Partial cystectomy demonstrated superior postoperative outcomes, including fewer surgical site infections, reduced operative time, less blood loss, and shorter hospitalization. Oncological outcomes and other postoperative complications were comparable between PC and TC, supporting PC as a safe and effective option in selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04367-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Locally advanced colorectal tumors frequently invade adjacent organs, particularly the urinary bladder in the sigmoid colon and upper rectum, complicating multivisceral resections. This study compared postoperative outcomes of partial cystectomy (PC) and total cystectomy (TC) in patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Central Register of Clinical Trials, and Web of Science for studies published up to November 2024. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. Statistical analyses were performed in R Software 4.4.1.

Results: Nine retrospective studies including 894 patients were analyzed. Among them, 433 (48.43%) underwent PC, and 461 (51.57%) underwent TC. Compared to TC, PC was associated with significantly lower rates of surgical site infection (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.13-0.80; p = 0.015), shorter operative time (MD - 169.7 min; 95% CI - 214.1 to - 125.3; p < 0.01), reduced blood loss (MD - 1005.9 ml; 95% CI - 1362.1 to - 649.8; p < 0.01), and shorter hospital stay (MD - 6.6 days; 95% CI - 9.4 to - 3.9; p < 0.01). No significant differences were observed between groups in local or distant recurrence, urinary and intestinal leaks, pelvic abscess, ileus, urinary tract infection, or 90-day mortality.

Conclusion: Partial cystectomy demonstrated superior postoperative outcomes, including fewer surgical site infections, reduced operative time, less blood loss, and shorter hospitalization. Oncological outcomes and other postoperative complications were comparable between PC and TC, supporting PC as a safe and effective option in selected patients.

局部结直肠癌部分膀胱切除术与根治性膀胱切除术:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:局部晚期结直肠肿瘤常侵犯邻近脏器,尤其是乙状结肠和上直肠的膀胱,并发多脏器切除。本研究比较局部晚期结直肠癌患者膀胱部分切除术(PC)和全膀胱切除术(TC)的术后疗效。方法:系统回顾PubMed、Scopus、Central Register of Clinical Trials和Web of Science上截至2024年11月发表的研究。使用随机效应模型合并95%置信区间(ci)的优势比(ORs)和平均差异(MDs)。采用I2统计量评估异质性。在R Software 4.4.1中进行统计分析。结果:9项回顾性研究共纳入894例患者。其中PC 433例(48.43%),TC 461例(51.57%)。与TC相比,PC与较低的手术部位感染率相关(OR 0.33;95% ci 0.13-0.80;p = 0.015),手术时间较短(MD - 169.7 min;95% CI - 214.1至- 125.3;p结论:膀胱部分切除术具有较好的术后效果,包括手术部位感染较少,手术时间缩短,出血量减少,住院时间缩短。肿瘤预后和其他术后并发症在PC和TC之间具有可比性,支持PC在选定的患者中作为安全有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信