Decomposing disparities in the utilization of basic public health services between locals and internal migrants in China: the role of social determinants.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Xiaohui Zhai, Zhongliang Zhou, Sha Lai, Jieyu Wang, Yaxin Zhao, Guanping Liu, Zhichao Wang, Hongbin Fan, Yan Zhuang, Dantong Zhao, Dan Cao, Peter C Coyte
{"title":"Decomposing disparities in the utilization of basic public health services between locals and internal migrants in China: the role of social determinants.","authors":"Xiaohui Zhai, Zhongliang Zhou, Sha Lai, Jieyu Wang, Yaxin Zhao, Guanping Liu, Zhichao Wang, Hongbin Fan, Yan Zhuang, Dantong Zhao, Dan Cao, Peter C Coyte","doi":"10.1186/s12939-024-02371-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Internal migrants in China have long been at a disadvantage in terms of access to publicly financed services, as well as the utilization of public health services. The aim of the study was to examine inequities in the use of basic public health services between internal migrants and the local population and estimate the factors that contributed to inequity in use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data for this study was derived from the 2017 wave of the China Migrants Dynamic Survey. Basic public health services utilization was measured by the establishment of health records, health education and chronic disease management. We performed multivariable logistic regressions to examine inequities in the utilization of basic public health services between locals and internal migrants, and Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition was used to explore possible explanations for such inequities between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27,998 cases were included in the analysis. We found that the utilization rates for establishment of health records, health education and chronic disease management among internal migrants were 71.3%, 49.2% and 65.7% lower than their local counterparts, respectively. The decomposition results indicated that the inequities in the establishment of health records between locals and internal migrants were mainly explained by whether people had heard of the National Basic Public Health Services Program (NBPHSP) (17.67%) and by health insurance (5.99%). The contributors to the inequities in health education between locals and internal migrants were community involvement (14.71%) and whether people had heard of the NBPHSP (13.89%). The main factors contributing to the difference in utilization of chronic disease management between the two groups were whether people had heard of the NBPHSP (14.49%) and community involvement (8.43%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To reduce inequities in the utilization of basic public health services between locals and internal migrants, measures need to be taken to improve knowledge about the basic public health services and to help migrants integrate into the local community.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02371-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Internal migrants in China have long been at a disadvantage in terms of access to publicly financed services, as well as the utilization of public health services. The aim of the study was to examine inequities in the use of basic public health services between internal migrants and the local population and estimate the factors that contributed to inequity in use.

Methods: The data for this study was derived from the 2017 wave of the China Migrants Dynamic Survey. Basic public health services utilization was measured by the establishment of health records, health education and chronic disease management. We performed multivariable logistic regressions to examine inequities in the utilization of basic public health services between locals and internal migrants, and Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition was used to explore possible explanations for such inequities between the two groups.

Results: A total of 27,998 cases were included in the analysis. We found that the utilization rates for establishment of health records, health education and chronic disease management among internal migrants were 71.3%, 49.2% and 65.7% lower than their local counterparts, respectively. The decomposition results indicated that the inequities in the establishment of health records between locals and internal migrants were mainly explained by whether people had heard of the National Basic Public Health Services Program (NBPHSP) (17.67%) and by health insurance (5.99%). The contributors to the inequities in health education between locals and internal migrants were community involvement (14.71%) and whether people had heard of the NBPHSP (13.89%). The main factors contributing to the difference in utilization of chronic disease management between the two groups were whether people had heard of the NBPHSP (14.49%) and community involvement (8.43%).

Conclusions: To reduce inequities in the utilization of basic public health services between locals and internal migrants, measures need to be taken to improve knowledge about the basic public health services and to help migrants integrate into the local community.

中国本地人和内部流动人口在利用基本公共卫生服务方面的差距:社会决定因素的作用。
背景:长期以来,中国的境内流动人口在获得政府资助的服务以及利用公共卫生服务方面一直处于不利地位。本研究旨在考察国内流动人口与本地人口在使用基本公共卫生服务方面的不平等现象,并估计导致使用不平等的因素:本研究的数据来自 2017 年中国流动人口动态调查。通过建立健康档案、健康教育和慢性病管理来衡量基本公共卫生服务的使用情况。我们进行了多变量逻辑回归,以考察本地人和国内流动人口在基本公共卫生服务利用方面的不平等,并使用Oaxaca-Blinder分解法来探讨两组间不平等的可能解释:共有 27 998 个病例被纳入分析。我们发现,国内移民在建立健康档案、健康教育和慢性病管理方面的使用率分别比本地移民低 71.3%、49.2% 和 65.7%。分解结果表明,当地人和国内移民在建立健康档案方面的不平等主要是由人们是否听说过国家基本公共卫生服务项目(17.67%)和医疗保险(5.99%)造成的。造成当地人和国内移民在健康教育方面不平等的因素是社区参与(14.71%)和人们是否听说过国家基本公共卫生服务方案(13.89%)。导致两组人群在慢性病管理利用率方面存在差异的主要因素是人们是否听说过国家预防和控制慢性病计划(14.49%)和社区参与(8.43%):为了减少当地人和国内移民在利用基本公共卫生服务方面的不平等,需要采取措施提高人们对基本公共卫生服务的认识,并帮助移民融入当地社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信