Friederike Dehli, Oscar O'Dwyer Lancaster-Jones, Daniela Duarte Campos
{"title":"Optimizing the value of bioinks and robotics to advance in vivo bioprinting.","authors":"Friederike Dehli, Oscar O'Dwyer Lancaster-Jones, Daniela Duarte Campos","doi":"10.1016/j.copbio.2024.103251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In vivo bioprinting strategies aim at facilitating immediate integration of engineered tissues with the host's biological system. As integral parts of current bioprinting technologies, bioinks and robotics should be holistically considered for new biomedical applications. This implies that chosen bioinks should exhibit rheological properties that are compatible with the fabrication method and vice versa, bioprinting tools might need to be redesigned and reconstructed to fit the characteristics of the needed bioinks that after solidification act as supporting matrices for living cells. In this piece, we identify current challenges in merging the best of these two principles, we highlight relevant studies that have addressed this need, and we propose ideas how to approach this challenge in the next years.</p>","PeriodicalId":10833,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in biotechnology","volume":"91 ","pages":"103251"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2024.103251","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In vivo bioprinting strategies aim at facilitating immediate integration of engineered tissues with the host's biological system. As integral parts of current bioprinting technologies, bioinks and robotics should be holistically considered for new biomedical applications. This implies that chosen bioinks should exhibit rheological properties that are compatible with the fabrication method and vice versa, bioprinting tools might need to be redesigned and reconstructed to fit the characteristics of the needed bioinks that after solidification act as supporting matrices for living cells. In this piece, we identify current challenges in merging the best of these two principles, we highlight relevant studies that have addressed this need, and we propose ideas how to approach this challenge in the next years.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Biotechnology (COBIOT) is renowned for publishing authoritative, comprehensive, and systematic reviews. By offering clear and readable syntheses of current advances in biotechnology, COBIOT assists specialists in staying updated on the latest developments in the field. Expert authors annotate the most noteworthy papers from the vast array of information available today, providing readers with valuable insights and saving them time.
As part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals, COBIOT is accompanied by the open-access primary research journal, Current Research in Biotechnology (CRBIOT). Leveraging the editorial excellence, high impact, and global reach of the Current Opinion legacy, CO+RE journals ensure they are widely read resources integral to scientists' workflows.
COBIOT is organized into themed sections, each reviewed once a year. These themes cover various areas of biotechnology, including analytical biotechnology, plant biotechnology, food biotechnology, energy biotechnology, environmental biotechnology, systems biology, nanobiotechnology, tissue, cell, and pathway engineering, chemical biotechnology, and pharmaceutical biotechnology.