Comparison of diagnostic performance for pulmonary nodule detection between free-breathing spiral ultrashort echo time and free-breathing radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yehai Jiang, Doudou Pu, Xuyang Zhang, Zhanli Ren, Nan Yu
{"title":"Comparison of diagnostic performance for pulmonary nodule detection between free-breathing spiral ultrashort echo time and free-breathing radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination.","authors":"Yehai Jiang, Doudou Pu, Xuyang Zhang, Zhanli Ren, Nan Yu","doi":"10.1186/s12880-024-01536-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of two free-breathing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences-spiral ultrashort echo time (spiral UTE) and radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (radial VIBE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were prospectively enrolled between February 2021 and September 2022. All participants underwent both 3T MRI scanning, utilizing the radial VIBE sequence and spiral UTE sequence, as well as standard chest CT imaging. The CT and MRI examinations were conducted within a 7-day interval. Two radiologists assessed the image quality using a visual 5-point ordinal Likert scale, and pulmonary nodules identified on MRI were evaluated through comparison with CT as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 52 patients participated in this study, during which 82 pulmonary nodules were detected via CT imaging. The image quality scores for depicting pulmonary vasculature and airways using the spiral UTE sequence (4.61 ± 0.63; 4.76 ± 0.48) were significantly higher than those for the radial VIBE sequence (4.27 ± 0.87; 4.14 ± 0.82) (P < 0.05). However, for nodules smaller than 6 mm, the detection rate for the spiral UTE sequence (82.61%) was notably higher than that of the radial VIBE sequence (39.13%) (P < 0.05). Additionally, the detection rate for ground-glass nodules was higher with the spiral UTE sequence (75.00%) compared to the radial VIBE sequence (17.86%) (P < 0.05). The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between radial VIBE and CT was 0.99 (P < 0.001), and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between spiral UTE and CT was also 0.99 (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The spiral UTE sequence demonstrates superior capability in visualizing ground glass nodules, blood vessels, and airways. In cases where patients present with ground glass nodules, the spiral UTE sequence is the preferred choice. Conversely, when the nodules are solid or partially solid, it is advisable to opt for radial VIBE sequences that are time-efficient and exhibit fewer artifacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11720306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01536-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of two free-breathing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences-spiral ultrashort echo time (spiral UTE) and radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (radial VIBE).

Methods: Patients were prospectively enrolled between February 2021 and September 2022. All participants underwent both 3T MRI scanning, utilizing the radial VIBE sequence and spiral UTE sequence, as well as standard chest CT imaging. The CT and MRI examinations were conducted within a 7-day interval. Two radiologists assessed the image quality using a visual 5-point ordinal Likert scale, and pulmonary nodules identified on MRI were evaluated through comparison with CT as the reference standard.

Results: A total of 52 patients participated in this study, during which 82 pulmonary nodules were detected via CT imaging. The image quality scores for depicting pulmonary vasculature and airways using the spiral UTE sequence (4.61 ± 0.63; 4.76 ± 0.48) were significantly higher than those for the radial VIBE sequence (4.27 ± 0.87; 4.14 ± 0.82) (P < 0.05). However, for nodules smaller than 6 mm, the detection rate for the spiral UTE sequence (82.61%) was notably higher than that of the radial VIBE sequence (39.13%) (P < 0.05). Additionally, the detection rate for ground-glass nodules was higher with the spiral UTE sequence (75.00%) compared to the radial VIBE sequence (17.86%) (P < 0.05). The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between radial VIBE and CT was 0.99 (P < 0.001), and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between spiral UTE and CT was also 0.99 (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The spiral UTE sequence demonstrates superior capability in visualizing ground glass nodules, blood vessels, and airways. In cases where patients present with ground glass nodules, the spiral UTE sequence is the preferred choice. Conversely, when the nodules are solid or partially solid, it is advisable to opt for radial VIBE sequences that are time-efficient and exhibit fewer artifacts.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信