Baseline gray matter volume associates with working memory performance after prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Behavioural Brain Research Pub Date : 2025-03-12 Epub Date: 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115416
Oscar Martin-Garcia, Pedro Henrique Rodrigues da Silva, Stefanie De Smet, Sara De Witte, Andre R Brunoni, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt, Lais B Razza
{"title":"Baseline gray matter volume associates with working memory performance after prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation.","authors":"Oscar Martin-Garcia, Pedro Henrique Rodrigues da Silva, Stefanie De Smet, Sara De Witte, Andre R Brunoni, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt, Lais B Razza","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Working memory is crucial for daily life and is often impaired in neuropsychiatric conditions. Attempts to enhance it using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have shown mixed results, possibly due to large inter-individual variability. This study assessed whether baseline regional brain volume was associated with working memory performance following tDCS. Healthy participants were randomly assigned to three bilateral tDCS protocols (sham, 1.5 mA, and 3 mA) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) (anode-left, cathode-right) for 20 minutes, in a within-subjects design with a 2-week interval, followed by emotional and non-emotional 3-back tasks. Baseline volumetric data were used to extract gray matter volumes of defined regions of interest; the dlPFC, the medial PFC (mPFC), and the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) bilaterally. Data from thirty-nine participants (69.2 % female, mean age: 24.56 years) across 112 tDCS sessions were analyzed. Findings revealed no significant association between working memory performance post sham-tDCS and gray matter volume. However, larger baseline cortical volumes across all regions were associated with slower reaction times and lower accuracy for the non-emotional task at 1.5 mA, whereas non-significant results were observed at 3 mA. For the emotional task, only a significant association for reaction time after 3 mA and left dlPFC and right PCC were found. Findings highlight not only the association between individual baseline gray matter, but also the impact of methodological choices, such as current intensity and outcome, on the effect of tDCS. Future research should aim to further explore individual variability and methodological factors to deepen our understanding of the mechanisms underlying tDCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":"481 ","pages":"115416"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115416","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Working memory is crucial for daily life and is often impaired in neuropsychiatric conditions. Attempts to enhance it using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have shown mixed results, possibly due to large inter-individual variability. This study assessed whether baseline regional brain volume was associated with working memory performance following tDCS. Healthy participants were randomly assigned to three bilateral tDCS protocols (sham, 1.5 mA, and 3 mA) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) (anode-left, cathode-right) for 20 minutes, in a within-subjects design with a 2-week interval, followed by emotional and non-emotional 3-back tasks. Baseline volumetric data were used to extract gray matter volumes of defined regions of interest; the dlPFC, the medial PFC (mPFC), and the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) bilaterally. Data from thirty-nine participants (69.2 % female, mean age: 24.56 years) across 112 tDCS sessions were analyzed. Findings revealed no significant association between working memory performance post sham-tDCS and gray matter volume. However, larger baseline cortical volumes across all regions were associated with slower reaction times and lower accuracy for the non-emotional task at 1.5 mA, whereas non-significant results were observed at 3 mA. For the emotional task, only a significant association for reaction time after 3 mA and left dlPFC and right PCC were found. Findings highlight not only the association between individual baseline gray matter, but also the impact of methodological choices, such as current intensity and outcome, on the effect of tDCS. Future research should aim to further explore individual variability and methodological factors to deepen our understanding of the mechanisms underlying tDCS.

前额叶经颅直流电刺激后,基线灰质体积与工作记忆表现相关。
工作记忆对日常生活至关重要,在神经精神疾病中经常受损。尝试使用经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)来增强它的结果好坏不一,可能是由于个体间的差异很大。这项研究评估了基线区域脑容量是否与tDCS后的工作记忆表现有关。健康参与者被随机分配到三种双侧tDCS方案(假,1.5 mA和3 mA)在背外侧前额叶皮层(dlPFC)(阳极左,阴极右)上(阳极左,阴极右)20 分钟,在受试者内部设计中,间隔2周,随后是情绪和非情绪3-back任务。基线体积数据用于提取定义的感兴趣区域的灰质体积;双侧的dlPFC,内侧PFC (mPFC)和后扣带皮层(PCC)。来自39名参与者(69.2 %为女性,平均年龄:24.56岁)的数据分析了112次tDCS会议。研究结果显示,假tdcs后的工作记忆表现与灰质体积之间没有显著关联。然而,所有区域较大的基线皮质体积与1.5 mA时非情绪任务的反应时间较慢和准确性较低相关,而在3 mA时观察到无显著结果。对于情绪任务,3 mA后的反应时间与左左pfc和右PCC有显著关联。研究结果不仅强调了个体基线灰质之间的关联,还强调了方法选择(如电流强度和结果)对tDCS效果的影响。未来的研究应旨在进一步探索个体差异和方法因素,以加深我们对tDCS机制的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioural Brain Research
Behavioural Brain Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
383
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信