Arterial Reconstruction Using the Right Gastroepiploic Artery in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Takanobu Hara, Akihiko Soyama, Hajime Matsushima, Takashi Hamada, Ayaka Kinoshita, Hajime Imamura, Mampei Yamashita, Ayaka Satoh, Kazushige Migita, Yuta Kawaguchi, Tomohiko Adachi, Mitsuhisa Takatsuki, Susumu Eguchi
{"title":"Arterial Reconstruction Using the Right Gastroepiploic Artery in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience.","authors":"Takanobu Hara, Akihiko Soyama, Hajime Matsushima, Takashi Hamada, Ayaka Kinoshita, Hajime Imamura, Mampei Yamashita, Ayaka Satoh, Kazushige Migita, Yuta Kawaguchi, Tomohiko Adachi, Mitsuhisa Takatsuki, Susumu Eguchi","doi":"10.12659/AOT.946135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Recipient hepatic arteries are generally used for arterial reconstructions in living donor liver transplantation. When the hepatic arteries are not feasible, the right gastroepiploic artery is one of the options for arterial reconstructions. In this study, we evaluate the feasibility of using the right gastroepiploic artery and report the analyzed retrospective patient outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS We included 324 patients who underwent primary living donor liver transplantation between August 1997 and December 2023. The rates of complications and surgical outcomes for different arteries used for reconstruction were compared between the groups. RESULTS For primary arterial reconstruction, the right gastroepiploic artery was used in 18 patients. The incidence of arterial complications and biliary strictures was higher than in the remaining 306 patients (P=0.01 and P=0.21, respectively). The 1-year and 5-year graft survival rates were 83.3% and 77.8% in the right gastroepiploic artery group, and 83.7% and 70.1% in the hepatic artery group, respectively (P=0.58). Eleven patients underwent arterial re-reconstruction secondary to arterial complications. The right gastroepiploic artery was used for the first time in 7 of these patients because the hepatic arteries were not reusable. Arterial complications after arterial re-reconstruction occurred in 4 patients (36.4%). CONCLUSIONS Arterial reconstruction using the right gastroepiploic artery was an effective option when the hepatic arteries were not suitable options, as it offered graft outcomes comparable to those of hepatic artery reconstruction, despite an increased risk of arterial and biliary complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":"30 ","pages":"e946135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/AOT.946135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Recipient hepatic arteries are generally used for arterial reconstructions in living donor liver transplantation. When the hepatic arteries are not feasible, the right gastroepiploic artery is one of the options for arterial reconstructions. In this study, we evaluate the feasibility of using the right gastroepiploic artery and report the analyzed retrospective patient outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS We included 324 patients who underwent primary living donor liver transplantation between August 1997 and December 2023. The rates of complications and surgical outcomes for different arteries used for reconstruction were compared between the groups. RESULTS For primary arterial reconstruction, the right gastroepiploic artery was used in 18 patients. The incidence of arterial complications and biliary strictures was higher than in the remaining 306 patients (P=0.01 and P=0.21, respectively). The 1-year and 5-year graft survival rates were 83.3% and 77.8% in the right gastroepiploic artery group, and 83.7% and 70.1% in the hepatic artery group, respectively (P=0.58). Eleven patients underwent arterial re-reconstruction secondary to arterial complications. The right gastroepiploic artery was used for the first time in 7 of these patients because the hepatic arteries were not reusable. Arterial complications after arterial re-reconstruction occurred in 4 patients (36.4%). CONCLUSIONS Arterial reconstruction using the right gastroepiploic artery was an effective option when the hepatic arteries were not suitable options, as it offered graft outcomes comparable to those of hepatic artery reconstruction, despite an increased risk of arterial and biliary complications.

活体肝移植中使用右胃网膜动脉重建动脉:单中心经验。
背景:在活体肝移植中,受体肝动脉通常用于动脉重建。当肝动脉不可行时,右胃网膜动脉是动脉重建的选择之一。在这项研究中,我们评估了使用右胃大网膜动脉的可行性,并报告了回顾性分析的患者结果。材料和方法我们纳入了324例在1997年8月至2023年12月间接受了原发性活体肝移植的患者。比较两组不同动脉重建的并发症发生率和手术结果。结果18例原发性动脉重建采用右胃大网膜动脉。动脉并发症及胆道狭窄发生率高于其余306例(P=0.01, P=0.21)。右胃网膜动脉组1年和5年移植存活率分别为83.3%和77.8%,肝动脉组为83.7%和70.1% (P=0.58)。11例患者因动脉并发症接受了动脉重建。由于肝动脉不能重复使用,7例患者首次使用右胃网膜动脉。动脉重建后出现动脉并发症4例(36.4%)。结论:当肝动脉不适合时,使用右胃网膜动脉进行动脉重建是一种有效的选择,尽管动脉和胆道并发症的风险增加,但其移植结果与肝动脉重建相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Transplantation is one of the fast-developing journals open to all scientists and fields of transplant medicine and related research. The journal is published quarterly and provides extensive coverage of the most important advances in transplantation. Using an electronic on-line submission and peer review tracking system, Annals of Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The average time to first decision is around 3-4 weeks. Time to publication of accepted manuscripts continues to be shortened, with the Editorial team committed to a goal of 3 months from acceptance to publication. Expert reseachers and clinicians from around the world contribute original Articles, Review Papers, Case Reports and Special Reports in every pertinent specialty, providing a lot of arguments for discussion of exciting developments and controversies in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信