Knotless Versus Knotted Suture Anchors for Labral Repair of the Hip: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes

William L. Johns, Anthony N. Baumann, Megan E. Callaghan, Kempland C. Walley, Neel K. Patel, John Salvo
{"title":"Knotless Versus Knotted Suture Anchors for Labral Repair of the Hip: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes","authors":"William L. Johns, Anthony N. Baumann, Megan E. Callaghan, Kempland C. Walley, Neel K. Patel, John Salvo","doi":"10.1177/03635465241239689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Arthroscopic labral repair of the hip is successfully performed with increasing frequency using either knotless or knotted suture anchors, each with its own risks and benefits.Purpose:To examine biomechanical and clinical outcomes for labral repair of the hip based on the use of knotted or knotless suture anchors.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A search was performed to retrieve clinical and biomechanical studies examining the use of knotless or knotted suture anchors for arthroscopic labral repair of the hip. The studied outcomes included functional outcome scores such as modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living, biomechanical outcomes, failure mechanisms, and complications such as revision/reoperation and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA).Results:A total of 47 articles met inclusion criteria for analysis (5 articles examining biomechanical outcomes and 42 reporting clinical outcomes). Included patients (N = 6185) who underwent hip labral repair had a mean age of 33.0 ± 8.5 years and follow-up time of 43.8 ± 18.4 months. The knotless group (n = 2719) had a mean preoperative mHHS of 63.3 ± 4.1 and postoperative mHHS of 86.3 ± 2.8 at a mean follow-up time of 47.2 ± 16.1 months. The knotted group (n = 2600) had a mean preoperative mHHS of 69.5 ± 8.3 and postoperative mHHS of 88.8 ± 5.5 with a mean follow-up time of 44.8 ± 18.1 months. The most common reason for failure of knotless anchors in biomechanical studies was suture breakage or pullout, and for knotted anchors it was anchor pullout. Of the articles reporting on revisions and/or conversion to THA after labral repair, the knotless group had 225 reoperations (8.1%) and 123 cases of conversion to THA (4.4%). The knotted group had 101 reoperations (6.2%) and 31 cases of conversion to THA (1.9%).Conclusion:Arthroscopic management of labral repairs of the hip using either knotless or knotted suture anchors appears to be both safe and effective in reducing pain and improving function. Biomechanical evaluation suggests differing failure mechanisms in knotted versus knotless anchors. The rates of revision and conversion to THA are low overall, irrespective of knotted or knotless anchors.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241239689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:Arthroscopic labral repair of the hip is successfully performed with increasing frequency using either knotless or knotted suture anchors, each with its own risks and benefits.Purpose:To examine biomechanical and clinical outcomes for labral repair of the hip based on the use of knotted or knotless suture anchors.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A search was performed to retrieve clinical and biomechanical studies examining the use of knotless or knotted suture anchors for arthroscopic labral repair of the hip. The studied outcomes included functional outcome scores such as modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living, biomechanical outcomes, failure mechanisms, and complications such as revision/reoperation and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA).Results:A total of 47 articles met inclusion criteria for analysis (5 articles examining biomechanical outcomes and 42 reporting clinical outcomes). Included patients (N = 6185) who underwent hip labral repair had a mean age of 33.0 ± 8.5 years and follow-up time of 43.8 ± 18.4 months. The knotless group (n = 2719) had a mean preoperative mHHS of 63.3 ± 4.1 and postoperative mHHS of 86.3 ± 2.8 at a mean follow-up time of 47.2 ± 16.1 months. The knotted group (n = 2600) had a mean preoperative mHHS of 69.5 ± 8.3 and postoperative mHHS of 88.8 ± 5.5 with a mean follow-up time of 44.8 ± 18.1 months. The most common reason for failure of knotless anchors in biomechanical studies was suture breakage or pullout, and for knotted anchors it was anchor pullout. Of the articles reporting on revisions and/or conversion to THA after labral repair, the knotless group had 225 reoperations (8.1%) and 123 cases of conversion to THA (4.4%). The knotted group had 101 reoperations (6.2%) and 31 cases of conversion to THA (1.9%).Conclusion:Arthroscopic management of labral repairs of the hip using either knotless or knotted suture anchors appears to be both safe and effective in reducing pain and improving function. Biomechanical evaluation suggests differing failure mechanisms in knotted versus knotless anchors. The rates of revision and conversion to THA are low overall, irrespective of knotted or knotless anchors.
无结与有结缝合锚钉用于髋关节唇部修复:临床和生物力学结果的系统回顾
背景:关节镜下的髋关节唇侧修复越来越多地成功地使用无结或有结缝合锚,每种都有其自身的风险和益处。目的:研究使用有结或无结缝合锚钉进行髋关节唇侧修复的生物力学和临床结果。研究设计:系统评价;证据等级,4级。方法:检索临床和生物力学研究,检查关节镜下使用无结或有结缝合锚钉修复髋关节。研究结果包括功能结果评分,如改良Harris髋关节评分(mHHS)和髋关节结果评分,日常生活活动,生物力学结果,失败机制和并发症,如翻修/再手术和全髋关节置换术(THA)。结果:共有47篇文章符合纳入分析标准(5篇研究生物力学结果,42篇报道临床结果)。6185例接受髋关节唇部修复术的患者平均年龄33.0±8.5岁,随访时间43.8±18.4个月。无结组(n = 2719)术前mHHS平均值为63.3±4.1,术后mHHS平均值为86.3±2.8,平均随访时间为47.2±16.1个月。结瘤组(2600例)术前mHHS平均值为69.5±8.3,术后mHHS平均值为88.8±5.5,平均随访时间为44.8±18.1个月。在生物力学研究中,无节锚钉失败的最常见原因是缝线断裂或拔出,而有节锚钉失败的原因是锚钉拔出。在报道唇部修复后改版和/或转为THA的文章中,无节组有225例(8.1%)再手术,123例(4.4%)转为THA。打结组再手术101例(6.2%),转THA 31例(1.9%)。结论:关节镜下使用无结或有结缝合锚钉进行髋关节唇侧修复,在减轻疼痛和改善功能方面安全有效。生物力学评价表明有节锚与无节锚的失效机制不同。无论有无打结锚钉,THA的修正和转换率总体上都很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信