Disparities in cervical cancer elimination timeframes in the United States: a comparative modeling study

Emily A Burger, Erik E L Jansen, Daniël de Bondt, James Killen, Jennifer C Spencer, Mary Caroline Regan, Megan A Smith, Stephen Sy, Karen Canfell, Inge M C M de Kok, Jane J Kim, Jan A C Hontelez
{"title":"Disparities in cervical cancer elimination timeframes in the United States: a comparative modeling study","authors":"Emily A Burger, Erik E L Jansen, Daniël de Bondt, James Killen, Jennifer C Spencer, Mary Caroline Regan, Megan A Smith, Stephen Sy, Karen Canfell, Inge M C M de Kok, Jane J Kim, Jan A C Hontelez","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Population-level estimates in timeframes for reaching cervical cancer (CC) elimination (ie, <4 cases per 100,000 women) in the United States may mask potential disparities in achieving elimination among sub-populations. We used three independent Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) models to estimate differences in the time to CC elimination across seven strata of correlated screening and human papillomavirus vaccination uptake, based on national survey data. Compared to the average population, elimination was achieved ≥22 years earlier for the high-uptake strata and ≥27 years later for the most extreme low-uptake strata. Accounting for correlated uptake impacted the population average timeframe by ≤ 1 year. Consequently, national average elimination timeframes mask substantial disparities in reaching elimination among sub-populations. Addressing inequalities in CC control could shorten elimination timeframes and would ensure more equitable elimination across populations. Furthermore, country-level elimination monitoring could be supplemented by monitoring progress in sub-populations.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Population-level estimates in timeframes for reaching cervical cancer (CC) elimination (ie, <4 cases per 100,000 women) in the United States may mask potential disparities in achieving elimination among sub-populations. We used three independent Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) models to estimate differences in the time to CC elimination across seven strata of correlated screening and human papillomavirus vaccination uptake, based on national survey data. Compared to the average population, elimination was achieved ≥22 years earlier for the high-uptake strata and ≥27 years later for the most extreme low-uptake strata. Accounting for correlated uptake impacted the population average timeframe by ≤ 1 year. Consequently, national average elimination timeframes mask substantial disparities in reaching elimination among sub-populations. Addressing inequalities in CC control could shorten elimination timeframes and would ensure more equitable elimination across populations. Furthermore, country-level elimination monitoring could be supplemented by monitoring progress in sub-populations.
美国宫颈癌消除时间框架的差异:一项比较模型研究
在美国实现消除宫颈癌(CC)的时间框架(即每10万名妇女中有4例)的人口水平估计可能掩盖了在实现消除亚人群中的潜在差异。我们使用三个独立的癌症干预和监测建模网络(CISNET)模型,根据国家调查数据,估计七个相关筛查和人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种阶段CC消除时间的差异。与平均种群相比,高吸收率地层的消除时间提前≥22年,最极端低吸收率地层的消除时间延迟≥27年。考虑到相关摄取对人口平均时间的影响≤1年。因此,国家平均消除时间框架掩盖了亚人群之间实现消除的巨大差异。解决CC控制方面的不平等问题可以缩短消除时间框架,并确保在人群中更公平地消除。此外,国家一级的消除监测可以通过监测亚种群的进展加以补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信