Synthesising enablers and barriers to hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance-A systematic review of qualitative findings.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-01-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0313216
Dina Moussa, Joan Ericka Flores, Joseph S Doyle, Marno Ryan, Jack Wallace, Jessica Howell
{"title":"Synthesising enablers and barriers to hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance-A systematic review of qualitative findings.","authors":"Dina Moussa, Joan Ericka Flores, Joseph S Doyle, Marno Ryan, Jack Wallace, Jessica Howell","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0313216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>This systematic literature review of qualitative findings aims to identify the perceived barriers and enablers for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance from patient and clinician perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of databases using key term combinations with the following inclusion criteria: 1) qualitative and quantitative (survey) studies exploring barriers and enablers of HCC surveillance, and 2) qualitative and quantitative (survey) studies exploring barriers and enablers of enagagement in clinical care for patients with cirrhosis and/or viral hepatitis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search returned 445 citations: 371 did not meet the study criteria and were excluded. 74 studies proceeded to full-text review, leading to 21 included studies (15 studies from searching with a further six studies from citation review) progressing to data extraction by two independent reviewers. Results from studies exploring patients' perspectives reinforce that barriers are experienced by patients across different health settings, cultures, and regions. Logistical barriers including costs and transportation, and knowledge/awareness barriers were commonly identified. Studies that included clinician perspectives highlighted the need for healthcare provider education and system-level interventions to optimize HCC surveillance uptake in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the critical need for interventions that enable engagement in HCC surveillance in health services.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 1","pages":"e0313216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313216","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & aims: This systematic literature review of qualitative findings aims to identify the perceived barriers and enablers for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance from patient and clinician perspectives.

Methods: A systematic search of databases using key term combinations with the following inclusion criteria: 1) qualitative and quantitative (survey) studies exploring barriers and enablers of HCC surveillance, and 2) qualitative and quantitative (survey) studies exploring barriers and enablers of enagagement in clinical care for patients with cirrhosis and/or viral hepatitis.

Results: The search returned 445 citations: 371 did not meet the study criteria and were excluded. 74 studies proceeded to full-text review, leading to 21 included studies (15 studies from searching with a further six studies from citation review) progressing to data extraction by two independent reviewers. Results from studies exploring patients' perspectives reinforce that barriers are experienced by patients across different health settings, cultures, and regions. Logistical barriers including costs and transportation, and knowledge/awareness barriers were commonly identified. Studies that included clinician perspectives highlighted the need for healthcare provider education and system-level interventions to optimize HCC surveillance uptake in clinical practice.

Conclusion: These findings highlight the critical need for interventions that enable engagement in HCC surveillance in health services.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肝细胞癌监测的综合促进因素和障碍——对定性研究结果的系统回顾。
背景与目的:本文对定性研究结果进行了系统的文献综述,旨在从患者和临床医生的角度确定肝细胞癌(HCC)监测的障碍和促进因素。方法:系统搜索数据库,使用关键术语组合,纳入标准如下:1)定性和定量(调查)研究探讨HCC监测的障碍和促进因素;2)定性和定量(调查)研究探讨肝硬化和/或病毒性肝炎患者临床护理的障碍和促进因素。结果:检索返回445条引文,其中371条不符合研究标准,被排除。74项研究进行了全文审查,其中21项纳入研究(15项研究来自检索,另外6项研究来自引文审查)由两名独立审稿人进行数据提取。探索患者观点的研究结果强化了不同卫生环境、文化和地区的患者所经历的障碍。包括成本和运输在内的物流障碍以及知识/意识障碍通常被确定。包括临床医生观点的研究强调了医疗保健提供者教育和系统级干预的必要性,以优化临床实践中HCC监测的吸收。结论:这些发现强调了干预措施的迫切需要,这些干预措施能够在卫生服务中参与HCC监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信