{"title":"qPRF: A system to accelerate population receptive field modeling","authors":"Sebastian Waz , Yalin Wang , Zhong-Lin Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>BOLD response can be fitted using the population receptive field (PRF) model to reveal how visual input is represented on the cortex (Dumoulin and Wandell, 2008). Fitting the PRF model costs considerable time, often requiring days to analyze BOLD signals for a small cohort of subjects. We introduce the qPRF (“quick PRF”), a system for accelerated PRF modeling that reduced the computation time by a factor <span><math><mrow><mo>></mo><mn>1</mn><mo>,</mo><mn>000</mn></mrow></math></span> without losing goodness-of-fit when compared to another widely available PRF modeling package (Kay et al., 2013) on a benchmark of data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP; Van Essen et al. (2013). The system achieves this level of acceleration by pre-computing a tree-like data structure, which it rapidly searches during the fitting step for an optimal parameter combination. We tested the method on a constrained four-parameter version of the PRF model (Strategy 1 herein) and an unconstrained five-parameter PRF model, which the qPRF fitted at comparable speed (Strategy 2). We show how an additional search step can guarantee optimality of qPRF solutions with little additional time cost (Strategy 3). To assess the quality of qPRF solutions, we compared our Strategy 1 solutions to those provided by Benson et al. (2018) who performed a similar four-parameter fit. Both hemispheres of the 181 subjects in the HCP dataset (a total of 10,753,572 vertices, each with a unique BOLD time series of 1800 frames) were analyzed by qPRF in 12.82 h on an ordinary CPU. The absolute difference in <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> achieved by the qPRF compared to Benson et al. (2018) was negligible, with a median of 0.025% (<span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> units being between 0% and 100%). In general, the qPRF yielded a slightly better fitting solution, achieving a greater <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> on 70.2% of vertices. We also assess the qPRF method’s model-recovery ability using a simulated dataset. The qPRF may facilitate the development and use of more elaborate models based on the PRF framework and may pave the way for novel clinical applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19299,"journal":{"name":"NeuroImage","volume":"306 ","pages":"Article 120994"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroImage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811924004919","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BOLD response can be fitted using the population receptive field (PRF) model to reveal how visual input is represented on the cortex (Dumoulin and Wandell, 2008). Fitting the PRF model costs considerable time, often requiring days to analyze BOLD signals for a small cohort of subjects. We introduce the qPRF (“quick PRF”), a system for accelerated PRF modeling that reduced the computation time by a factor without losing goodness-of-fit when compared to another widely available PRF modeling package (Kay et al., 2013) on a benchmark of data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP; Van Essen et al. (2013). The system achieves this level of acceleration by pre-computing a tree-like data structure, which it rapidly searches during the fitting step for an optimal parameter combination. We tested the method on a constrained four-parameter version of the PRF model (Strategy 1 herein) and an unconstrained five-parameter PRF model, which the qPRF fitted at comparable speed (Strategy 2). We show how an additional search step can guarantee optimality of qPRF solutions with little additional time cost (Strategy 3). To assess the quality of qPRF solutions, we compared our Strategy 1 solutions to those provided by Benson et al. (2018) who performed a similar four-parameter fit. Both hemispheres of the 181 subjects in the HCP dataset (a total of 10,753,572 vertices, each with a unique BOLD time series of 1800 frames) were analyzed by qPRF in 12.82 h on an ordinary CPU. The absolute difference in achieved by the qPRF compared to Benson et al. (2018) was negligible, with a median of 0.025% ( units being between 0% and 100%). In general, the qPRF yielded a slightly better fitting solution, achieving a greater on 70.2% of vertices. We also assess the qPRF method’s model-recovery ability using a simulated dataset. The qPRF may facilitate the development and use of more elaborate models based on the PRF framework and may pave the way for novel clinical applications.
BOLD反应可以使用群体接受野(PRF)模型来拟合,以揭示视觉输入是如何在皮层上表示的(Dumoulin和Wandell, 2008)。拟合PRF模型需要相当长的时间,通常需要数天的时间来分析一小群受试者的BOLD信号。我们引入了qPRF(“快速PRF”),这是一个加速PRF建模的系统,与另一个广泛使用的PRF建模包(Kay等人,2013)相比,它在人类连接组项目(HCP;Van Essen et al.(2013)。该系统通过预先计算一个树状数据结构来实现这种程度的加速,并在拟合步骤中快速搜索最优参数组合。我们测试方法的约束的四个参数版本PRF模型(此处策略1)和一个不受约束的5个参数编码脉冲模型,其中qPRF安装速度可比(策略2)。我们展示一个额外的搜索步骤可以保证最优qPRF解决方案几乎没有额外时间成本(战略3)。评估qPRF解决方案的质量,我们比较我们的策略1解决方案提供的那些本森et al .(2018)执行一个类似的四个参数。在普通CPU上,使用qPRF在12.82 h内分析了HCP数据集中181名受试者的两个半球(共10,753,572个顶点,每个顶点具有唯一的1,800帧BOLD时间序列)。与Benson等人(2018)相比,qPRF实现的R2绝对差异可以忽略不计,中位数为0.025% (R2单位介于0%和100%之间)。一般来说,qPRF产生了稍微更好的拟合解决方案,在70.2%的顶点上实现了更大的R2。我们还使用模拟数据集评估了qPRF方法的模型恢复能力。qPRF可以促进基于PRF框架的更精细模型的开发和使用,并可能为新的临床应用铺平道路。
期刊介绍:
NeuroImage, a Journal of Brain Function provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in acquiring, analyzing, and modelling neuroimaging data and in applying these techniques to the study of structure-function and brain-behavior relationships. Though the emphasis is on the macroscopic level of human brain organization, meso-and microscopic neuroimaging across all species will be considered if informative for understanding the aforementioned relationships.