Comparison of Transepidermal Water Loss in Preterm Newborns Treated with Two Different Types of Phototherapies.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Meryem Aydin, Serap Balci
{"title":"Comparison of Transepidermal Water Loss in Preterm Newborns Treated with Two Different Types of Phototherapies.","authors":"Meryem Aydin, Serap Balci","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare transepidermal water loss (TEWL) in preterm newborns treated with two different types of phototherapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this experimental randomized controlled study, participants were 60 preterm infants aged 30 to 36 weeks' gestation who were admitted to the neonatal ICU of Duzce University Research and Application Center from December 2015 to May 2016. Researchers randomly assigned the newborns to two phototherapy groups: light-emitting diode (LED) and fluorescent phototherapy. Each group included 30 participants. Data were collected using a demographic information form and an evaporimeter to measure TEWL levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior to phototherapy, the anterior region TEWL values were 11.99 ± 3.04 and 11.56 ± 3.99 g/m2 per hour in the fluorescent and LED groups, respectively, and the posterior region TEWL values were 12.82 ± 3.94 and 12.42 ± 4.24 g/m2 per hour in the fluorescent and LED groups, respectively. Prior to phototherapy, anterior and posterior TEWL measurements did not differ either within or between groups. However, in comparison with fluorescent group participants, participants in the LED group experienced significantly less water loss at 30 minutes and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours after the start of phototherapy (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fluorescent phototherapy causes more water loss than LED phototherapy in preterm infants, and TEWL values are similar in both anterior and posterior measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":"37 11&12","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000227","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare transepidermal water loss (TEWL) in preterm newborns treated with two different types of phototherapies.

Methods: In this experimental randomized controlled study, participants were 60 preterm infants aged 30 to 36 weeks' gestation who were admitted to the neonatal ICU of Duzce University Research and Application Center from December 2015 to May 2016. Researchers randomly assigned the newborns to two phototherapy groups: light-emitting diode (LED) and fluorescent phototherapy. Each group included 30 participants. Data were collected using a demographic information form and an evaporimeter to measure TEWL levels.

Results: Prior to phototherapy, the anterior region TEWL values were 11.99 ± 3.04 and 11.56 ± 3.99 g/m2 per hour in the fluorescent and LED groups, respectively, and the posterior region TEWL values were 12.82 ± 3.94 and 12.42 ± 4.24 g/m2 per hour in the fluorescent and LED groups, respectively. Prior to phototherapy, anterior and posterior TEWL measurements did not differ either within or between groups. However, in comparison with fluorescent group participants, participants in the LED group experienced significantly less water loss at 30 minutes and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours after the start of phototherapy (P < .001).

Conclusions: Fluorescent phototherapy causes more water loss than LED phototherapy in preterm infants, and TEWL values are similar in both anterior and posterior measurements.

两种不同光疗法治疗早产儿经皮失水的比较。
目的:比较两种不同光疗法对早产儿经皮失水的影响。方法:本实验随机对照研究选取2015年12月至2016年5月在Duzce大学研究与应用中心新生儿重症监护室住院的60例妊娠30 ~ 36周的早产儿。研究人员将新生儿随机分配到两个光疗组:发光二极管(LED)和荧光光疗组。每组包括30名参与者。使用人口统计信息表和蒸发器测量TEWL水平来收集数据。结果:光疗前,荧光组和LED组前侧TEWL值分别为11.99±3.04和11.56±3.99 g/m2 / h,荧光组和LED组后侧TEWL值分别为12.82±3.94和12.42±4.24 g/m2 / h。光疗前,前后TEWL测量在组内或组间均无差异。然而,与荧光组参与者相比,LED组参与者在光疗开始后30分钟和1、3、6、12和24小时的失水明显减少(P < 0.001)。结论:荧光光疗比LED光疗更容易导致早产儿水分流失,且前后测量TEWL值相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Skin & Wound Care
Advances in Skin & Wound Care DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
271
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信