Is there sufficient evidence to inform personal protective equipment choices for healthcare workers caring for patients with viral hemorrhagic fevers?

Amanda Graham, Steven Ettles, Maureen McGrath, Toju Ogunremi, Jennifer Selkirk, Natalie Bruce
{"title":"Is there sufficient evidence to inform personal protective equipment choices for healthcare workers caring for patients with viral hemorrhagic fevers?","authors":"Amanda Graham, Steven Ettles, Maureen McGrath, Toju Ogunremi, Jennifer Selkirk, Natalie Bruce","doi":"10.14745/ccdr.v51i01a02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ugandan health authorities declared an outbreak of Ebola disease (EBOD), caused by the Sudan virus, in September 2022. A rapid review was conducted to update the Public Health Agency of Canada's guidelines for infection prevention and control measures for EBOD in healthcare settings to prepare for potential introduction of cases.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Summarize the available evidence on personal protective equipment (PPE) use by healthcare workers (HCWs) to prevent exposure to and transmission of viral hemorrhagic fevers (VHFs), including Ebola virus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases were searched to identify peer-reviewed evidence published from July 2014-October 2022. Peer-reviewed primary studies and literature reviews, in English or French, reporting on PPE for VHFs and filoviruses in the healthcare context were eligible for inclusion. Literature review processes were conducted by two reviewers using DistillerSR® systematic review software and the Public Health Agency of Canada's Infection Prevention and Control Critical Appraisal Toolkit. An environmental scan of grey literature was also conducted to inform the rapid review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The database search yielded 417 citations and 29 studies were considered eligible for critical appraisal. In total, 20 studies were included in the narrative synthesis of evidence. The evidence base was limited regarding comparative effectiveness of types of PPE for preventing exposure to and transmission of VHFs to HCWs. Four studies reported on exposure to and transmission of a VHF. Sixteen studies provided data on other relevant topics, such as simulated contamination and lab-based tests of PPE integrity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is limited evidence with which to draw conclusions on the comparative effectiveness of PPE to prevent exposure to and transmission of VHFs to HCWs. Additional research is required to determine the optimal PPE to protect HCWs from exposure to and transmission of VHFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94304,"journal":{"name":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","volume":"51 1","pages":"7-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v51i01a02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ugandan health authorities declared an outbreak of Ebola disease (EBOD), caused by the Sudan virus, in September 2022. A rapid review was conducted to update the Public Health Agency of Canada's guidelines for infection prevention and control measures for EBOD in healthcare settings to prepare for potential introduction of cases.

Objective: Summarize the available evidence on personal protective equipment (PPE) use by healthcare workers (HCWs) to prevent exposure to and transmission of viral hemorrhagic fevers (VHFs), including Ebola virus.

Methods: Electronic databases were searched to identify peer-reviewed evidence published from July 2014-October 2022. Peer-reviewed primary studies and literature reviews, in English or French, reporting on PPE for VHFs and filoviruses in the healthcare context were eligible for inclusion. Literature review processes were conducted by two reviewers using DistillerSR® systematic review software and the Public Health Agency of Canada's Infection Prevention and Control Critical Appraisal Toolkit. An environmental scan of grey literature was also conducted to inform the rapid review.

Results: The database search yielded 417 citations and 29 studies were considered eligible for critical appraisal. In total, 20 studies were included in the narrative synthesis of evidence. The evidence base was limited regarding comparative effectiveness of types of PPE for preventing exposure to and transmission of VHFs to HCWs. Four studies reported on exposure to and transmission of a VHF. Sixteen studies provided data on other relevant topics, such as simulated contamination and lab-based tests of PPE integrity.

Conclusion: There is limited evidence with which to draw conclusions on the comparative effectiveness of PPE to prevent exposure to and transmission of VHFs to HCWs. Additional research is required to determine the optimal PPE to protect HCWs from exposure to and transmission of VHFs.

是否有足够的证据提示照顾病毒性出血热患者的卫生保健工作者选择个人防护装备?
背景:乌干达卫生当局于2022年9月宣布发生由苏丹病毒引起的埃博拉疫情。进行了一次快速审查,以更新加拿大公共卫生署关于卫生保健环境中EBOD感染预防和控制措施的指南,为可能出现的病例做好准备。目的:总结卫生保健工作者(HCWs)使用个人防护装备(PPE)预防包括埃博拉病毒在内的病毒性出血热(vhf)暴露和传播的现有证据。方法:检索电子数据库,检索2014年7月至2022年10月发表的同行评议证据。报告卫生保健环境中vhf和丝状病毒防护措施的英文或法文同行评议的初步研究和文献综述符合纳入条件。文献综述过程由两名审稿人使用DistillerSR®系统评价软件和加拿大公共卫生署感染预防和控制关键评价工具包进行。还对灰色文献进行了环境扫描,以便为快速审查提供信息。结果:数据库检索产生了417条引用,29项研究被认为有资格进行关键评价。总共有20项研究被纳入证据的叙述性综合。关于不同类型的个人防护用品在防止接触甚高频和将甚高频传播给卫生工作者方面的相对有效性,证据基础有限。四项研究报告了甚高频的接触和传播。16项研究提供了其他相关主题的数据,例如模拟污染和基于实验室的个人防护装备完整性测试。结论:关于个人防护装备在防止接触甚高频病毒并将其传播给卫生工作者方面的相对有效性,目前尚无证据可据此得出结论。需要进一步研究以确定保护卫生工作者免受甚高频接触和传播的最佳个人防护装备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信