The potential of GPT-4 advanced data analysis for radiomics-based machine learning models.

IF 3.7 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neuro-oncology advances Pub Date : 2024-12-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/noajnl/vdae230
Martha Foltyn-Dumitru, Aditya Rastogi, Jaeyoung Cho, Marianne Schell, Mustafa Ahmed Mahmutoglu, Tobias Kessler, Felix Sahm, Wolfgang Wick, Martin Bendszus, Gianluca Brugnara, Philipp Vollmuth
{"title":"The potential of GPT-4 advanced data analysis for radiomics-based machine learning models.","authors":"Martha Foltyn-Dumitru, Aditya Rastogi, Jaeyoung Cho, Marianne Schell, Mustafa Ahmed Mahmutoglu, Tobias Kessler, Felix Sahm, Wolfgang Wick, Martin Bendszus, Gianluca Brugnara, Philipp Vollmuth","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdae230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to explore the potential of the Advanced Data Analytics (ADA) package of GPT-4 to autonomously develop machine learning models (MLMs) for predicting glioma molecular types using radiomics from MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Radiomic features were extracted from preoperative MRI of <i>n</i> = 615 newly diagnosed glioma patients to predict glioma molecular types (IDH-wildtype vs IDH-mutant 1p19q-codeleted vs IDH-mutant 1p19q-non-codeleted) with a multiclass ML approach. Specifically, ADA was used to autonomously develop an ML pipeline and benchmark performance against an established handcrafted model using various MRI normalization methods (N4, Zscore, and WhiteStripe). External validation was performed on 2 public glioma datasets D2 (<i>n</i> = 160) and D3 (<i>n</i> = 410).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GPT-4 achieved the highest accuracy of 0.820 (95% CI = 0.819-0.821) on the D3 dataset with N4/WS normalization, significantly outperforming the benchmark model's accuracy of 0.678 (95% CI = 0.677-0.680) (<i>P</i> < .001). Class-wise analysis showed performance variations across different glioma types. In the IDH-wildtype group, GPT-4 had a recall of 0.997 (95% CI = 0.997-0.997), surpassing the benchmark's 0.742 (95% CI = 0.740-0.743). For the IDH-mut 1p/19q-non-codel group, GPT-4's recall was 0.275 (95% CI = 0.272-0.279), lower than the benchmark's 0.426 (95% CI = 0.423-0.430). In the IDH-mut 1p/19q-codel group, GPT-4's recall was 0.199 (95% CI = 0.191-0.206), below the benchmark's 0.730 (95% CI = 0.721-0.738). On the D2 dataset, GPT-4's accuracy was significantly lower (<i>P</i> < .001) than the benchmark's, with N4/WS achieving 0.668 (95% CI = 0.666-0.671) compared with 0.719 (95% CI = 0.717-0.722) (<i>P</i> < .001). Class-wise analysis revealed the same pattern as observed in D3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GPT-4 can autonomously develop radiomics-based MLMs, achieving performance comparable to handcrafted MLMs. However, its poorer class-wise performance due to unbalanced datasets shows limitations in handling complete end-to-end ML pipelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"7 1","pages":"vdae230"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11707530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to explore the potential of the Advanced Data Analytics (ADA) package of GPT-4 to autonomously develop machine learning models (MLMs) for predicting glioma molecular types using radiomics from MRI.

Methods: Radiomic features were extracted from preoperative MRI of n = 615 newly diagnosed glioma patients to predict glioma molecular types (IDH-wildtype vs IDH-mutant 1p19q-codeleted vs IDH-mutant 1p19q-non-codeleted) with a multiclass ML approach. Specifically, ADA was used to autonomously develop an ML pipeline and benchmark performance against an established handcrafted model using various MRI normalization methods (N4, Zscore, and WhiteStripe). External validation was performed on 2 public glioma datasets D2 (n = 160) and D3 (n = 410).

Results: GPT-4 achieved the highest accuracy of 0.820 (95% CI = 0.819-0.821) on the D3 dataset with N4/WS normalization, significantly outperforming the benchmark model's accuracy of 0.678 (95% CI = 0.677-0.680) (P < .001). Class-wise analysis showed performance variations across different glioma types. In the IDH-wildtype group, GPT-4 had a recall of 0.997 (95% CI = 0.997-0.997), surpassing the benchmark's 0.742 (95% CI = 0.740-0.743). For the IDH-mut 1p/19q-non-codel group, GPT-4's recall was 0.275 (95% CI = 0.272-0.279), lower than the benchmark's 0.426 (95% CI = 0.423-0.430). In the IDH-mut 1p/19q-codel group, GPT-4's recall was 0.199 (95% CI = 0.191-0.206), below the benchmark's 0.730 (95% CI = 0.721-0.738). On the D2 dataset, GPT-4's accuracy was significantly lower (P < .001) than the benchmark's, with N4/WS achieving 0.668 (95% CI = 0.666-0.671) compared with 0.719 (95% CI = 0.717-0.722) (P < .001). Class-wise analysis revealed the same pattern as observed in D3.

Conclusions: GPT-4 can autonomously develop radiomics-based MLMs, achieving performance comparable to handcrafted MLMs. However, its poorer class-wise performance due to unbalanced datasets shows limitations in handling complete end-to-end ML pipelines.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信