Pediatric brain tumor classification using deep learning on MR images with age fusion.

IF 3.7 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neuro-oncology advances Pub Date : 2024-12-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/noajnl/vdae205
Iulian Emil Tampu, Tamara Bianchessi, Ida Blystad, Peter Lundberg, Per Nyman, Anders Eklund, Neda Haj-Hosseini
{"title":"Pediatric brain tumor classification using deep learning on MR images with age fusion.","authors":"Iulian Emil Tampu, Tamara Bianchessi, Ida Blystad, Peter Lundberg, Per Nyman, Anders Eklund, Neda Haj-Hosseini","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdae205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To implement and evaluate deep learning-based methods for the classification of pediatric brain tumors (PBT) in magnetic resonance (MR) data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A subset of the \"Children's Brain Tumor Network\" dataset was retrospectively used (<i>n</i> = 178 subjects, female = 72, male = 102, NA = 4, age range [0.01, 36.49] years) with tumor types being low-grade astrocytoma (<i>n</i> = 84), ependymoma (<i>n</i> = 32), and medulloblastoma (<i>n</i> = 62). T1w post-contrast (<i>n</i> = 94 subjects), T2w (<i>n</i> = 160 subjects), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC: <i>n</i> = 66 subjects) MR sequences were used separately. Two deep learning models were trained on transversal slices showing tumor. Joint fusion was implemented to combine image and age data, and 2 pre-training paradigms were utilized. Model explainability was investigated using gradient-weighted class-activation mapping (Grad-CAM), and the learned feature space was visualized using principal component analysis (PCA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest tumor-type classification performance was achieved when using a vision transformer model pre-trained on ImageNet and fine-tuned on ADC images with age fusion (Matthews correlation coefficient [MCC]: 0.77 ± 0.14, Accuracy: 0.87 ± 0.08), followed by models trained on T2w (MCC: 0.58 ± 0.11, Accuracy: 0.73 ± 0.08) and T1w post-contrast (MCC: 0.41 ± 0.11, Accuracy: 0.62 ± 0.08) data. Age fusion marginally improved the model's performance. Both model architectures performed similarly across the experiments, with no differences between the pre-training strategies. Grad-CAMs showed that the models' attention focused on the brain region. PCA of the feature space showed greater separation of the tumor-type clusters when using contrastive pre-training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Classification of PBT on MR images could be accomplished using deep learning, with the top-performing model being trained on ADC data, which radiologists use for the clinical classification of these tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"7 1","pages":"vdae205"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11701748/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To implement and evaluate deep learning-based methods for the classification of pediatric brain tumors (PBT) in magnetic resonance (MR) data.

Methods: A subset of the "Children's Brain Tumor Network" dataset was retrospectively used (n = 178 subjects, female = 72, male = 102, NA = 4, age range [0.01, 36.49] years) with tumor types being low-grade astrocytoma (n = 84), ependymoma (n = 32), and medulloblastoma (n = 62). T1w post-contrast (n = 94 subjects), T2w (n = 160 subjects), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC: n = 66 subjects) MR sequences were used separately. Two deep learning models were trained on transversal slices showing tumor. Joint fusion was implemented to combine image and age data, and 2 pre-training paradigms were utilized. Model explainability was investigated using gradient-weighted class-activation mapping (Grad-CAM), and the learned feature space was visualized using principal component analysis (PCA).

Results: The highest tumor-type classification performance was achieved when using a vision transformer model pre-trained on ImageNet and fine-tuned on ADC images with age fusion (Matthews correlation coefficient [MCC]: 0.77 ± 0.14, Accuracy: 0.87 ± 0.08), followed by models trained on T2w (MCC: 0.58 ± 0.11, Accuracy: 0.73 ± 0.08) and T1w post-contrast (MCC: 0.41 ± 0.11, Accuracy: 0.62 ± 0.08) data. Age fusion marginally improved the model's performance. Both model architectures performed similarly across the experiments, with no differences between the pre-training strategies. Grad-CAMs showed that the models' attention focused on the brain region. PCA of the feature space showed greater separation of the tumor-type clusters when using contrastive pre-training.

Conclusion: Classification of PBT on MR images could be accomplished using deep learning, with the top-performing model being trained on ADC data, which radiologists use for the clinical classification of these tumors.

基于年龄融合的磁共振图像深度学习儿童脑肿瘤分类。
目的:实现并评估基于深度学习的儿童脑肿瘤(PBT)磁共振(MR)数据分类方法。方法:回顾性使用“儿童脑肿瘤网络”数据集的一个子集(n = 178名受试者,女性= 72名,男性= 102名,NA = 4名,年龄范围[0.01,36.49]岁),肿瘤类型为低级别星形细胞瘤(n = 84),室管膜瘤(n = 32)和髓母细胞瘤(n = 62)。对比后T1w (n = 94)、T2w (n = 160)和表观扩散系数(ADC: n = 66)分别采用MR序列。在显示肿瘤的横切片上训练两个深度学习模型。采用关节融合技术将图像与年龄数据进行融合,并采用了2种预训练模式。利用梯度加权类激活映射(Grad-CAM)研究模型的可解释性,并利用主成分分析(PCA)对学习到的特征空间进行可视化。结果:在ImageNet上进行预训练并对ADC图像进行年龄融合微调的视觉变形模型(Matthews相关系数[MCC]: 0.77±0.14,准确率:0.87±0.08)分类效果最佳,其次是T2w (MCC: 0.58±0.11,准确率:0.73±0.08)和T1w (MCC: 0.41±0.11,准确率:0.62±0.08)数据训练的模型。年龄融合略微提高了模型的性能。两种模型架构在整个实验中表现相似,预训练策略之间没有差异。grad - cam显示,模型的注意力集中在大脑区域。采用对比预训练时,特征空间的主成分分析显示肿瘤类型聚类分离程度更高。结论:利用深度学习可以完成MR图像上PBT的分类,在ADC数据上训练表现最好的模型,放射科医生将其用于这些肿瘤的临床分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信