Polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A phase III bridging study in Chinese patients.
Yuqin Song, Qingyuan Zhang, Qingqing Cai, Yongping Song, Liling Zhang, Pengcheng He, Li Wang, Jamie Hirata, Lisa Musick, Rong Deng, Wenxin Liu, Xin Wang, Jun Zhu
{"title":"Polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A phase III bridging study in Chinese patients.","authors":"Yuqin Song, Qingyuan Zhang, Qingqing Cai, Yongping Song, Liling Zhang, Pengcheng He, Li Wang, Jamie Hirata, Lisa Musick, Rong Deng, Wenxin Liu, Xin Wang, Jun Zhu","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_269_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with transplant-ineligible relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) have limited treatment options and poor outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase III study (NCT04236141) evaluated the efficacy and safety of polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab (Pola+BR) versus BR in Chinese patients with transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL to support regulatory submission in China. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive Pola+BR or placebo+BR. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) at the end of treatment (EOT) by positron emission tomography-computed tomography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 42 patients were analyzed (Pola+BR, n = 28; placebo+BR, n = 14). At data cutoff (July 12, 2021; median follow-up: 7.5 months), CR at EOT was 25.0% (7/28) with Pola+BR and 14.3% (2/14) with placebo+BR, 10.7% difference [95% confidence interval (CI): -19.0, 40.4]. The median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 4.6 (95%CI: 3.1-6.4) months with Pola+BR and 2.0 (95% CI: 1.9-4.6) months with placebo+BR, with a 50% reduction in risk of progression or death (unstratified hazard ratio: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.24-1.05). The median overall survival was 10.6 [95% CI: 5.5-not evaluable (NE)] and 6.5 (95% CI: 6.0-NE) months, with a 45% reduction in risk of death. The incidence of Grade 3-4 adverse events was similar between Pola+BR (20/27 patients, 74.1%) and placebo+BR arms (11/14 patients, 78.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efficacy findings were consistent with results of the GO29365 study (NCT02257567); treatment with Pola+BR led to clinically meaningful improvements in response rates in Chinese patients with transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL with no new safety signals.</p>","PeriodicalId":94070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":"20 7","pages":"2133-2140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_269_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patients with transplant-ineligible relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) have limited treatment options and poor outcomes.
Methods: This phase III study (NCT04236141) evaluated the efficacy and safety of polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab (Pola+BR) versus BR in Chinese patients with transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL to support regulatory submission in China. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive Pola+BR or placebo+BR. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) at the end of treatment (EOT) by positron emission tomography-computed tomography.
Results: Overall, 42 patients were analyzed (Pola+BR, n = 28; placebo+BR, n = 14). At data cutoff (July 12, 2021; median follow-up: 7.5 months), CR at EOT was 25.0% (7/28) with Pola+BR and 14.3% (2/14) with placebo+BR, 10.7% difference [95% confidence interval (CI): -19.0, 40.4]. The median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 4.6 (95%CI: 3.1-6.4) months with Pola+BR and 2.0 (95% CI: 1.9-4.6) months with placebo+BR, with a 50% reduction in risk of progression or death (unstratified hazard ratio: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.24-1.05). The median overall survival was 10.6 [95% CI: 5.5-not evaluable (NE)] and 6.5 (95% CI: 6.0-NE) months, with a 45% reduction in risk of death. The incidence of Grade 3-4 adverse events was similar between Pola+BR (20/27 patients, 74.1%) and placebo+BR arms (11/14 patients, 78.6%).
Conclusions: Efficacy findings were consistent with results of the GO29365 study (NCT02257567); treatment with Pola+BR led to clinically meaningful improvements in response rates in Chinese patients with transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL with no new safety signals.