Polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A phase III bridging study in Chinese patients.

Yuqin Song, Qingyuan Zhang, Qingqing Cai, Yongping Song, Liling Zhang, Pengcheng He, Li Wang, Jamie Hirata, Lisa Musick, Rong Deng, Wenxin Liu, Xin Wang, Jun Zhu
{"title":"Polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A phase III bridging study in Chinese patients.","authors":"Yuqin Song, Qingyuan Zhang, Qingqing Cai, Yongping Song, Liling Zhang, Pengcheng He, Li Wang, Jamie Hirata, Lisa Musick, Rong Deng, Wenxin Liu, Xin Wang, Jun Zhu","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_269_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with transplant-ineligible relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) have limited treatment options and poor outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase III study (NCT04236141) evaluated the efficacy and safety of polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab (Pola+BR) versus BR in Chinese patients with transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL to support regulatory submission in China. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive Pola+BR or placebo+BR. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) at the end of treatment (EOT) by positron emission tomography-computed tomography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 42 patients were analyzed (Pola+BR, n = 28; placebo+BR, n = 14). At data cutoff (July 12, 2021; median follow-up: 7.5 months), CR at EOT was 25.0% (7/28) with Pola+BR and 14.3% (2/14) with placebo+BR, 10.7% difference [95% confidence interval (CI): -19.0, 40.4]. The median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 4.6 (95%CI: 3.1-6.4) months with Pola+BR and 2.0 (95% CI: 1.9-4.6) months with placebo+BR, with a 50% reduction in risk of progression or death (unstratified hazard ratio: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.24-1.05). The median overall survival was 10.6 [95% CI: 5.5-not evaluable (NE)] and 6.5 (95% CI: 6.0-NE) months, with a 45% reduction in risk of death. The incidence of Grade 3-4 adverse events was similar between Pola+BR (20/27 patients, 74.1%) and placebo+BR arms (11/14 patients, 78.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efficacy findings were consistent with results of the GO29365 study (NCT02257567); treatment with Pola+BR led to clinically meaningful improvements in response rates in Chinese patients with transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL with no new safety signals.</p>","PeriodicalId":94070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":"20 7","pages":"2133-2140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_269_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with transplant-ineligible relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) have limited treatment options and poor outcomes.

Methods: This phase III study (NCT04236141) evaluated the efficacy and safety of polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab (Pola+BR) versus BR in Chinese patients with transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL to support regulatory submission in China. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive Pola+BR or placebo+BR. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) at the end of treatment (EOT) by positron emission tomography-computed tomography.

Results: Overall, 42 patients were analyzed (Pola+BR, n = 28; placebo+BR, n = 14). At data cutoff (July 12, 2021; median follow-up: 7.5 months), CR at EOT was 25.0% (7/28) with Pola+BR and 14.3% (2/14) with placebo+BR, 10.7% difference [95% confidence interval (CI): -19.0, 40.4]. The median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 4.6 (95%CI: 3.1-6.4) months with Pola+BR and 2.0 (95% CI: 1.9-4.6) months with placebo+BR, with a 50% reduction in risk of progression or death (unstratified hazard ratio: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.24-1.05). The median overall survival was 10.6 [95% CI: 5.5-not evaluable (NE)] and 6.5 (95% CI: 6.0-NE) months, with a 45% reduction in risk of death. The incidence of Grade 3-4 adverse events was similar between Pola+BR (20/27 patients, 74.1%) and placebo+BR arms (11/14 patients, 78.6%).

Conclusions: Efficacy findings were consistent with results of the GO29365 study (NCT02257567); treatment with Pola+BR led to clinically meaningful improvements in response rates in Chinese patients with transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL with no new safety signals.

Polatuzumab vedotin联合苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗治疗复发/难治性弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤:中国患者的III期桥接研究
背景:不适合移植的复发/难治性弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(R/R DLBCL)患者的治疗选择有限,预后较差。方法:这项III期研究(NCT04236141)评估了polatuzumab vedotin +苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗(Pola+BR)与BR在中国移植不合格的R/R DLBCL患者中的疗效和安全性,以支持在中国的监管申请。患者按2:1随机分配,接受Pola+BR或安慰剂+BR。主要终点是通过正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描治疗结束时的完全缓解(CR)。结果:总共分析了42例患者(Pola+BR, n = 28;安慰剂+BR, n = 14)。数据截止日期(2021年7月12日;中位随访时间:7.5个月),Pola+BR组的EOT CR为25.0%(7/28),安慰剂+BR组的CR为14.3%(2/14),差异为10.7%[95%可信区间(CI): -19.0, 40.4]。研究者评估的中位无进展生存期,Pola+BR组为4.6 (95%CI: 3.1-6.4)个月,安慰剂+BR组为2.0 (95%CI: 1.9-4.6)个月,进展或死亡风险降低50%(无分层风险比:0.50;95% ci: 0.24-1.05)。中位总生存期为10.6个月[95% CI: 5.5-不可评估(NE)]和6.5个月(95% CI: 6.0-NE),死亡风险降低45%。Pola+BR组(20/27例,74.1%)和安慰剂+BR组(11/14例,78.6%)的3-4级不良事件发生率相似。结论:疗效发现与GO29365研究(NCT02257567)的结果一致;Pola+BR治疗导致中国移植不合格的R/R DLBCL患者的缓解率有临床意义的改善,没有新的安全性信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信