Anaphylaxis management: knowledge of Brazilian pediatricians.

IF 2
Maria Cecília Barata Dos Santos Figueira, Georgia Veras de Araújo Gueiros Lira, Giselia Alves Pontes da Silva, Emídio Cavalcanti de Albuquerque, Luciana Rodrigues Silva, Dirceu Solé, Emanuel Sávio Cavalcanti Sarinho
{"title":"Anaphylaxis management: knowledge of Brazilian pediatricians.","authors":"Maria Cecília Barata Dos Santos Figueira, Georgia Veras de Araújo Gueiros Lira, Giselia Alves Pontes da Silva, Emídio Cavalcanti de Albuquerque, Luciana Rodrigues Silva, Dirceu Solé, Emanuel Sávio Cavalcanti Sarinho","doi":"10.1590/1984-0462/2025/43/2024087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To verify the level of knowledge of Brazilian pediatricians about anaphylaxis, identifying sociodemographic and educational characteristics of the professional which contribute to the adequate management of this clinical disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was carried out on the management of anaphylaxis using a questionnaire prepared and distributed by email to pediatricians in different states in Brazil. The level of knowledge about anaphylaxis was classified as: satisfactory; unsatisfactory; more than satisfactory; ideal, according to evaluation criteria adopted for the statements of clinical cases that addressed the drug of choice, route of administration, positioning of the patient with anaphylaxis and recognition of the clinical case with differential diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,645 Brazilian pediatricians participated, of which 48.5% had satisfactory knowledge of the management of anaphylaxis. Approaches to choosing the preferred drug for anaphylaxis and the route of administration were the biggest obstacles to responses. The factors associated with satisfactory knowledge were shorter time since graduation, having a medical residency in pediatrics, having a qualification in allergy and immunology, having completed the Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) in the last two years and having experience in anaphylaxis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results regarding satisfactory knowledge of anaphylaxis are lower than those expected for the treatment of a potentially fatal condition. It is important to encourage the continuing education of pediatricians who work mainly in emergencies, wards, and intensive care units, in light of the use of the assumptions of andragogy and Ausubel's theory, with active methodologies, to promote significant and permanent learning of management of anaphylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":74721,"journal":{"name":"Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo","volume":"43 ","pages":"e2024087"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654906/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/2025/43/2024087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To verify the level of knowledge of Brazilian pediatricians about anaphylaxis, identifying sociodemographic and educational characteristics of the professional which contribute to the adequate management of this clinical disorder.

Methods: A survey was carried out on the management of anaphylaxis using a questionnaire prepared and distributed by email to pediatricians in different states in Brazil. The level of knowledge about anaphylaxis was classified as: satisfactory; unsatisfactory; more than satisfactory; ideal, according to evaluation criteria adopted for the statements of clinical cases that addressed the drug of choice, route of administration, positioning of the patient with anaphylaxis and recognition of the clinical case with differential diagnosis.

Results: A total of 1,645 Brazilian pediatricians participated, of which 48.5% had satisfactory knowledge of the management of anaphylaxis. Approaches to choosing the preferred drug for anaphylaxis and the route of administration were the biggest obstacles to responses. The factors associated with satisfactory knowledge were shorter time since graduation, having a medical residency in pediatrics, having a qualification in allergy and immunology, having completed the Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) in the last two years and having experience in anaphylaxis.

Conclusions: The results regarding satisfactory knowledge of anaphylaxis are lower than those expected for the treatment of a potentially fatal condition. It is important to encourage the continuing education of pediatricians who work mainly in emergencies, wards, and intensive care units, in light of the use of the assumptions of andragogy and Ausubel's theory, with active methodologies, to promote significant and permanent learning of management of anaphylaxis.

过敏反应管理:巴西儿科医生的知识。
目的:验证巴西儿科医生对过敏反应的知识水平,确定该专业的社会人口学和教育特征,这些特征有助于对这种临床疾病进行充分的管理。方法:对巴西不同州的儿科医生进行过敏反应管理问卷调查。对过敏反应的了解程度分为:满意;不满意;非常满意的;理想的,根据临床病例陈述所采用的评估标准,解决了药物的选择,给药途径,过敏反应患者的体位和识别临床病例的鉴别诊断。结果:共有1645名巴西儿科医生参与调查,其中48.5%的医生对过敏反应的处理有满意的知识。选择过敏反应首选药物的方法和给药途径是反应的最大障碍。与满意知识相关的因素是毕业后时间较短,有儿科住院医师,有过敏和免疫学资格,在过去两年内完成了儿科高级生命支持(PALS),并有过敏反应经验。结论:关于令人满意的过敏反应知识的结果低于治疗潜在致命疾病的预期。鼓励主要在急诊科、病房和重症监护病房工作的儿科医生继续接受教育是很重要的,考虑到使用泌尿外科的假设和奥苏贝尔的理论,以积极的方法,促进过敏反应管理的重要和永久的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信