The "Outline Sign": Thin Hyperenhancing Perimeter as an MR Imaging Feature of Meningioma. A Useful Tool in the Temporal Bone Region for Differentiating Meningiomas from Schwannomas and Paragangliomas.

Anil K Vasireddi, Katherine L Reinshagen, Donghoon Shin, Laura V Romo, Amy F Juliano
{"title":"The \"Outline Sign\": Thin Hyperenhancing Perimeter as an MR Imaging Feature of Meningioma. A Useful Tool in the Temporal Bone Region for Differentiating Meningiomas from Schwannomas and Paragangliomas.","authors":"Anil K Vasireddi, Katherine L Reinshagen, Donghoon Shin, Laura V Romo, Amy F Juliano","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>This study investigates the practicality and utility of the \"outline sign,\" which refers to the thin curvilinear hyperenhancing line that may be seen along the margin of a meningioma on a spin-echo postcontrast T1-weighted image. For cases in which the differential diagnosis may include other tumors, visualization of the outline sign may help to increase the diagnostic confidence for a meningioma. Therefore, in the temporal bone region such as the cerebellopontine angle or jugular foramen, where differential considerations may include a schwannoma or paraganglioma, we additionally investigated whether the outline sign may be observed in these nonmeningioma lesions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 39 clinical MRIs of meningiomas, schwannomas, and paragangliomas with confirmed histopathologic data were studied retrospectively. Two experienced head and neck radiologists independently assessed for the presence or absence of an outline sign and subsequently formed a consensus opinion while blinded to patient information and histopathologic data. Interreader reliability was assessed by Cohen κ statistics. Simple bivariate comparisons were performed on the consensus opinions to assess for statistical differences in presence of the sign in meningiomas versus schwannomas and paragangliomas. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the sign with respect to identifying an underlying meningioma were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both readers displayed identical opinions in assessment of the outline sign in 34 of the 39 cases (87%), including 13 of the 14 meningiomas (93%), with substantial agreement (Cohen κ of 0.74). The outline sign was present in 12 of 14 meningiomas (86%), which was significantly greater in frequency compared with schwannomas (3 of 22, 14%) and paragangliomas (1 of 3, 33%). The outline sign demonstrated high sensitivity (86%), specificity (84%), and accuracy (85%) in identifying an underlying meningioma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The outline sign can serve as a useful tool for diagnosing meningiomas. It may help distinguish meningiomas from other enhancing tumors, for example schwannomas and paragangliomas in the temporal bone region.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"349-354"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: This study investigates the practicality and utility of the "outline sign," which refers to the thin curvilinear hyperenhancing line that may be seen along the margin of a meningioma on a spin-echo postcontrast T1-weighted image. For cases in which the differential diagnosis may include other tumors, visualization of the outline sign may help to increase the diagnostic confidence for a meningioma. Therefore, in the temporal bone region such as the cerebellopontine angle or jugular foramen, where differential considerations may include a schwannoma or paraganglioma, we additionally investigated whether the outline sign may be observed in these nonmeningioma lesions.

Materials and methods: A total of 39 clinical MRIs of meningiomas, schwannomas, and paragangliomas with confirmed histopathologic data were studied retrospectively. Two experienced head and neck radiologists independently assessed for the presence or absence of an outline sign and subsequently formed a consensus opinion while blinded to patient information and histopathologic data. Interreader reliability was assessed by Cohen κ statistics. Simple bivariate comparisons were performed on the consensus opinions to assess for statistical differences in presence of the sign in meningiomas versus schwannomas and paragangliomas. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the sign with respect to identifying an underlying meningioma were calculated.

Results: Both readers displayed identical opinions in assessment of the outline sign in 34 of the 39 cases (87%), including 13 of the 14 meningiomas (93%), with substantial agreement (Cohen κ of 0.74). The outline sign was present in 12 of 14 meningiomas (86%), which was significantly greater in frequency compared with schwannomas (3 of 22, 14%) and paragangliomas (1 of 3, 33%). The outline sign demonstrated high sensitivity (86%), specificity (84%), and accuracy (85%) in identifying an underlying meningioma.

Conclusions: The outline sign can serve as a useful tool for diagnosing meningiomas. It may help distinguish meningiomas from other enhancing tumors, for example schwannomas and paragangliomas in the temporal bone region.

“轮廓征象”:脑膜瘤的MR成像特征为薄的超增强周长。颞骨区脑膜瘤与神经鞘瘤及副神经节瘤鉴别的有用工具。
背景和目的:本研究探讨了“轮廓征象”的实用性和实用性,“轮廓征象”是指在旋转回声对比后t1加权图像上沿脑膜瘤边缘可见的细曲线超增强线。对于鉴别诊断可能包括其他肿瘤的病例,轮廓征象的可视化可能有助于增加脑膜瘤的诊断信心。因此,在颞骨区域,如桥小脑角或颈静脉孔,鉴别考虑可能包括神经鞘瘤或副神经节瘤,我们进一步研究了在这些非脑膜瘤病变中是否可以观察到轮廓征象。材料与方法:回顾性分析39例经病理证实的脑膜瘤、神经鞘瘤、副神经节瘤的临床mri。两名经验丰富的头颈部放射科医生在不了解患者信息和组织病理学数据的情况下,独立评估是否存在轮廓征,并随后形成共识意见。采用Cohen κ统计量评估解读器信度。简单的双变量比较在共识意见上进行,以评估脑膜瘤与神经鞘瘤和副神经节瘤的体征存在的统计学差异。计算该征象在鉴别潜在脑膜瘤方面的敏感性、特异性和准确性。结果:两位读者对39例中34例(87%),包括14例脑膜瘤中的13例(93%)的轮廓征象的评价意见一致(Cohen κ为0.74)。14例脑膜瘤中有12例(86%)出现大纲征象,与神经鞘瘤(22例中有3例,14%)和副神经节瘤(3例中有1例,33%)相比,其频率明显更高。轮廓征象在识别潜在脑膜瘤方面表现出高灵敏度(86%)、特异性(84%)和准确性(85%)。结论:轮廓征象可作为诊断脑膜瘤的有效工具。它可能有助于区分脑膜瘤与其他增强肿瘤,如颞骨区神经鞘瘤和副神经节瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信