Baseline Characteristics of Self-Determination Theory Constructs and Accelerometer-Derived Physical Activity: The Exercise Promotion in Primary Care (EPPC) Trial.

Deborah Rohm Young, Margo A Sidell, Jennifer J Jimenez, Edith Fauresviun, Justin N Tayag, May L Wang, Deborah A Cohen, Anny Xiang, Stephen P Fortmann
{"title":"Baseline Characteristics of Self-Determination Theory Constructs and Accelerometer-Derived Physical Activity: The Exercise Promotion in Primary Care (EPPC) Trial.","authors":"Deborah Rohm Young, Margo A Sidell, Jennifer J Jimenez, Edith Fauresviun, Justin N Tayag, May L Wang, Deborah A Cohen, Anny Xiang, Stephen P Fortmann","doi":"10.29011/2577-2228.100471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health behavior change theories provide a conceptual basis to promote physical activity, one of which is the Self-Determination Theory (SDT). This cross-sectional study compared SDT constructs, specifically exercise goal setting, exercise planning, and outcome expectations, with objectively assessed Moderate-To-Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) among a demographically diverse cohort of adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 18 to 74 years with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes not prescribed insulin and were physically inactive by self-report. MVPA was assessed with accelerometers. Exercise goal setting, exercise planning, outcome expectancies, and demographics were obtained by survey. Linear regression models were used to assess the association between the SDT constructs and daily MVPA, adjusted for age, gender, race and ethnicity, education, and diabetes status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 451 participants, with a mean age of 53.2 years; 77% were women. Most (56%) reported Hispanic ethnicity, 20% were Black or African American, 18% white, and 7% other/unknown. On average, participants engaged in 24.5 (SD, 18.48) daily MPVA minutes. The cohort was most positive for exercise outcomes expectancies (mean 3.95 SD, 0.70) and least positive for exercise goal setting (mean 2.10, SD, 0.95). A 1-unit higher exercise goal setting score was associated with 3.05 (95% CI: 1.29, 4.81) more daily MVPA minutes. A 1-unit higher exercise planning score was associated with 3.16 (95% CI: -0.11, 6.33; p=0.05) more daily MVPA minutes. There were no substantive differences by gender, race, ethnicity, or education status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found support for SDT constructs among adults with racial, ethnic, age, and educational diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":73682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community medicine & public health","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11709452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community medicine & public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2577-2228.100471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health behavior change theories provide a conceptual basis to promote physical activity, one of which is the Self-Determination Theory (SDT). This cross-sectional study compared SDT constructs, specifically exercise goal setting, exercise planning, and outcome expectations, with objectively assessed Moderate-To-Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) among a demographically diverse cohort of adults.

Methods: Participants were 18 to 74 years with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes not prescribed insulin and were physically inactive by self-report. MVPA was assessed with accelerometers. Exercise goal setting, exercise planning, outcome expectancies, and demographics were obtained by survey. Linear regression models were used to assess the association between the SDT constructs and daily MVPA, adjusted for age, gender, race and ethnicity, education, and diabetes status.

Results: The study included 451 participants, with a mean age of 53.2 years; 77% were women. Most (56%) reported Hispanic ethnicity, 20% were Black or African American, 18% white, and 7% other/unknown. On average, participants engaged in 24.5 (SD, 18.48) daily MPVA minutes. The cohort was most positive for exercise outcomes expectancies (mean 3.95 SD, 0.70) and least positive for exercise goal setting (mean 2.10, SD, 0.95). A 1-unit higher exercise goal setting score was associated with 3.05 (95% CI: 1.29, 4.81) more daily MVPA minutes. A 1-unit higher exercise planning score was associated with 3.16 (95% CI: -0.11, 6.33; p=0.05) more daily MVPA minutes. There were no substantive differences by gender, race, ethnicity, or education status.

Conclusions: We found support for SDT constructs among adults with racial, ethnic, age, and educational diversity.

自我决定理论建构和加速度计衍生的身体活动的基线特征:初级保健(EPPC)试验中的运动促进。
背景:健康行为改变理论为促进身体活动提供了概念基础,其中之一是自我决定理论(SDT)。本横断面研究比较了SDT结构,特别是运动目标设定、运动计划和结果预期,并在人口统计学上不同的成人队列中客观评估了中度至剧烈体育活动(MVPA)。方法:参与者年龄在18到74岁之间,患有糖尿病前期或2型糖尿病,没有处方胰岛素,并且自我报告身体不活跃。用加速度计评估MVPA。通过调查获得运动目标设定、运动计划、结果预期和人口统计数据。使用线性回归模型评估SDT结构与每日MVPA之间的关系,并根据年龄、性别、种族和民族、教育程度和糖尿病状况进行调整。结果:研究纳入451名参与者,平均年龄53.2岁;77%是女性。大多数(56%)报告为西班牙裔,20%为黑人或非裔美国人,18%为白人,7%为其他/未知。参与者平均每天MPVA时间为24.5分钟(SD, 18.48分钟)。该队列在运动结果预期方面最积极(平均3.95 SD, 0.70),在运动目标设定方面最不积极(平均2.10 SD, 0.95)。每增加1个单位的运动目标设定得分与每日MVPA分钟增加3.05 (95% CI: 1.29, 4.81)相关。运动计划评分高1个单位与3.16相关(95% CI: -0.11, 6.33;p=0.05)每日MVPA分钟增加。性别、种族、民族或教育状况没有实质性差异。结论:我们在不同种族、民族、年龄和教育程度的成年人中发现了SDT结构的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信