Repairing the Deltoid Ligament in Ankle Fractures Is it time for a Paradigm Shift?

Joy Van den Berg, Diederick Penning, Sebastian Baumbach, Tim Schepers
{"title":"Repairing the Deltoid Ligament in Ankle Fractures Is it time for a Paradigm Shift?","authors":"Joy Van den Berg, Diederick Penning, Sebastian Baumbach, Tim Schepers","doi":"10.1177/19386400241307817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It remains unclear whether repairing the deltoid ligament (DL) is beneficial in acute ankle fractures. The aim of this review is to critically review the developments in deltoid ligament repair (DLR) in ankle fractures over the course of 44 years.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An electronic search was conducted on the PubMed and Embase database including comparative studies evaluating the effect of performing DLR in adults suffering from a closed acute ankle fracture with suspected rupture of the DL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 studies were retrieved, of which only one was a randomized study. A total of 1327 patients were reviewed (663 undergoing DLR and 664 receiving non-DLR treatment for an acute ankle fracture). Although earlier studies concluded that DLR holds little necessity in ankle fracture treatment if the anatomy of the ankle is restored, more recent studies support DLR due to more favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>All studies agree that restoration of the ankle anatomy to its pre-fracture state is necessary to achieve the best clinical outcome. However, there is still controversy in whether to standardize DLR in ankle fracture treatment. The literature shows a clear shift toward more frequent restoration of the DL, and in light of improved surgical techniques and implants, there is a need for more rigorous studies to provide a clear indication for DLR in acute ankle fracture treatment.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong><i>III</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"19386400241307817"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400241307817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It remains unclear whether repairing the deltoid ligament (DL) is beneficial in acute ankle fractures. The aim of this review is to critically review the developments in deltoid ligament repair (DLR) in ankle fractures over the course of 44 years.

Method: An electronic search was conducted on the PubMed and Embase database including comparative studies evaluating the effect of performing DLR in adults suffering from a closed acute ankle fracture with suspected rupture of the DL.

Results: A total of 27 studies were retrieved, of which only one was a randomized study. A total of 1327 patients were reviewed (663 undergoing DLR and 664 receiving non-DLR treatment for an acute ankle fracture). Although earlier studies concluded that DLR holds little necessity in ankle fracture treatment if the anatomy of the ankle is restored, more recent studies support DLR due to more favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Discussion: All studies agree that restoration of the ankle anatomy to its pre-fracture state is necessary to achieve the best clinical outcome. However, there is still controversy in whether to standardize DLR in ankle fracture treatment. The literature shows a clear shift toward more frequent restoration of the DL, and in light of improved surgical techniques and implants, there is a need for more rigorous studies to provide a clear indication for DLR in acute ankle fracture treatment.

Level of evidence: III.

修复踝关节骨折的三角韧带是时候转变思维模式了吗?
背景:目前尚不清楚修复三角韧带(DL)对急性踝关节骨折是否有益。这篇综述的目的是回顾近44年来踝关节骨折三角韧带修复(DLR)的进展。方法:对PubMed和Embase数据库进行电子检索,包括比较研究,评估对患有闭合性急性踝关节骨折并怀疑踝关节破裂的成人进行DLR的效果。结果:共检索到27项研究,其中只有1项为随机研究。共回顾了1327例患者(663例接受DLR治疗,664例接受非DLR治疗的急性踝关节骨折)。尽管早期的研究得出结论,如果踝关节解剖恢复,DLR在踝关节骨折治疗中几乎没有必要,但最近的研究由于更有利的临床和影像学结果而支持DLR。讨论:所有的研究都一致认为,踝关节解剖恢复到骨折前的状态是达到最佳临床结果的必要条件。然而,在踝关节骨折治疗中是否应规范DLR仍存在争议。文献显示,深韧带恢复的频率明显增加,鉴于手术技术和植入物的改进,需要进行更严格的研究,以提供急性踝关节骨折治疗中DLR的明确指征。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信