Effect of Nutritional Intervention on Chemotherapy Tolerance and Quality of Life in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Postoperative Chemotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Jiwei Wang, Yong Huang, Xilan Zheng, Ming Xie, Yin Wu, Li Yang, Chunmei Yin
{"title":"Effect of Nutritional Intervention on Chemotherapy Tolerance and Quality of Life in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Postoperative Chemotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Jiwei Wang, Yong Huang, Xilan Zheng, Ming Xie, Yin Wu, Li Yang, Chunmei Yin","doi":"10.1080/01635581.2025.2449719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored the effect of symptom-based individualized nutritional intervention on chemotherapy tolerance and quality of life (QOL) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) undergoing postoperative chemotherapy. Postoperative patients with CRC (<i>n</i> = 88) were randomly assigned to the control group (CG, <i>n</i> = 45) and intervention group (IG, <i>n</i> = 43) receiving conventional diet counseling and symptom-based individualized nutritional intervention, respectively, and chemotherapy tolerance, adverse effects, and QOL were compared. Participants in the IG exhibited better nutritional status at the last chemotherapy cycle, with lower Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (2.37 ± 0.65 vs. 3.78 ± 0.65, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (6.26 ± 0.76 vs. 7.78 ± 0.70, <i>p</i> < 0.01) scores. Compared with CG, relative dose intensity reduction (9.3% vs. 25.89%, <i>p</i> = 0.02), chemotherapy regimen change (25.58% vs. 53.33%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and chemotherapy delay (13.95% vs. 35.56%, <i>p</i> = 0.019) were lower in the IG. Nausea/vomiting (2.33% vs. 17.78%, <i>p</i> = 0.017), thrombocytopenia (2.33% vs. 28.89%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and hand-foot syndrome (4.65% vs. 22.22%, <i>p</i> = 0.03) were less frequent in the IG. Participants in the IG had better QOL, with higher physical function scores at cycles 4 (67.91 ± 5.22 vs. 62.22 ± 4.02, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and 8 (72.71 ± 6.31 vs. 57.63 ± 4.75, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Individualized nutritional interventions improved chemotherapy tolerance and QOL and reduced adverse effects in this patient cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":54701,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2025.2449719","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored the effect of symptom-based individualized nutritional intervention on chemotherapy tolerance and quality of life (QOL) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) undergoing postoperative chemotherapy. Postoperative patients with CRC (n = 88) were randomly assigned to the control group (CG, n = 45) and intervention group (IG, n = 43) receiving conventional diet counseling and symptom-based individualized nutritional intervention, respectively, and chemotherapy tolerance, adverse effects, and QOL were compared. Participants in the IG exhibited better nutritional status at the last chemotherapy cycle, with lower Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (2.37 ± 0.65 vs. 3.78 ± 0.65, p < 0.01) and Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (6.26 ± 0.76 vs. 7.78 ± 0.70, p < 0.01) scores. Compared with CG, relative dose intensity reduction (9.3% vs. 25.89%, p = 0.02), chemotherapy regimen change (25.58% vs. 53.33%, p < 0.01), and chemotherapy delay (13.95% vs. 35.56%, p = 0.019) were lower in the IG. Nausea/vomiting (2.33% vs. 17.78%, p = 0.017), thrombocytopenia (2.33% vs. 28.89%, p < 0.01), and hand-foot syndrome (4.65% vs. 22.22%, p = 0.03) were less frequent in the IG. Participants in the IG had better QOL, with higher physical function scores at cycles 4 (67.91 ± 5.22 vs. 62.22 ± 4.02, p < 0.01) and 8 (72.71 ± 6.31 vs. 57.63 ± 4.75, p < 0.01). Individualized nutritional interventions improved chemotherapy tolerance and QOL and reduced adverse effects in this patient cohort.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: This timely publication reports and reviews current findings on the effects of nutrition on the etiology, therapy, and prevention of cancer. Etiological issues include clinical and experimental research in nutrition, carcinogenesis, epidemiology, biochemistry, and molecular biology. Coverage of therapy focuses on research in clinical nutrition and oncology, dietetics, and bioengineering. Prevention approaches include public health recommendations, preventative medicine, behavior modification, education, functional foods, and agricultural and food production policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信