Centering justice in the codesign of mindfulness and compassion-based college curricula.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK
Caitlin McKimmy, Natalie Avalos, Donna Mejia, Sona Dimidjian
{"title":"Centering justice in the codesign of mindfulness and compassion-based college curricula.","authors":"Caitlin McKimmy, Natalie Avalos, Donna Mejia, Sona Dimidjian","doi":"10.1037/ort0000817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colleges and universities are increasingly common contexts in which young people navigate the transition to adulthood. Research suggests that mindfulness and compassion may support undergraduates as they navigate this developmental transition. Embedding learning about mindfulness, compassion, and flourishing into college curricula demonstrates promise in supporting undergraduate wellness and academic outcomes. However, there is a need to generate curricula that are relevant to the lived realities of undergraduates and attentive to relational dimensions of wellness, including social justice and systemic determinants of health. Codesign holds promise as a method to generate such curricula. This study used qualitative methods to examine the codesign of an accredited college-level course that teaches about the interrelationship between mindfulness, compassion, human flourishing, and social justice. Qualitative data that emerged during the codesign process were analyzed to answer the following research questions: (1) How did mindfulness and compassion practice support the codesign process? (2) What design tensions emerged during the adaptation and collaborative design of a social justice-oriented mindfulness and compassion-based course? We found that weaving shared mindfulness and compassion practice into the codesign process supported study participants in working with their emotions, connecting with others, and balancing power. In turn, these skills allowed codesign team to effectively grapple with complex design tensions that arose on the levels of vision, approach, and project tensions as the team sought to fulfill its commitments to individual and collective transformation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55531,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000817","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Colleges and universities are increasingly common contexts in which young people navigate the transition to adulthood. Research suggests that mindfulness and compassion may support undergraduates as they navigate this developmental transition. Embedding learning about mindfulness, compassion, and flourishing into college curricula demonstrates promise in supporting undergraduate wellness and academic outcomes. However, there is a need to generate curricula that are relevant to the lived realities of undergraduates and attentive to relational dimensions of wellness, including social justice and systemic determinants of health. Codesign holds promise as a method to generate such curricula. This study used qualitative methods to examine the codesign of an accredited college-level course that teaches about the interrelationship between mindfulness, compassion, human flourishing, and social justice. Qualitative data that emerged during the codesign process were analyzed to answer the following research questions: (1) How did mindfulness and compassion practice support the codesign process? (2) What design tensions emerged during the adaptation and collaborative design of a social justice-oriented mindfulness and compassion-based course? We found that weaving shared mindfulness and compassion practice into the codesign process supported study participants in working with their emotions, connecting with others, and balancing power. In turn, these skills allowed codesign team to effectively grapple with complex design tensions that arose on the levels of vision, approach, and project tensions as the team sought to fulfill its commitments to individual and collective transformation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

以正念和同情为基础的大学课程的共同设计为中心。
学院和大学是年轻人走向成年的越来越普遍的环境。研究表明,正念和同情心可能会帮助大学生度过这一发展转变。在大学课程中嵌入关于正念、同情和繁荣的学习,有望支持本科生的健康和学术成果。然而,有必要编制与本科生的生活现实有关的课程,并注意健康的相关方面,包括社会正义和健康的系统决定因素。协同设计有望成为生成此类课程的一种方法。本研究采用定性方法考察了一门被认可的大学水平课程的共同设计,该课程教授正念、同情心、人类繁荣和社会正义之间的相互关系。本文分析了协同设计过程中出现的定性数据,以回答以下研究问题:(1)正念和慈悲练习如何支持协同设计过程?(2)在以社会正义为导向的正念和同情为基础的课程的适应和协作设计中出现了哪些设计紧张关系?我们发现,将共享的正念和同情实践融入协同设计过程,有助于研究参与者处理自己的情绪,与他人联系,以及平衡权力。反过来,这些技能使协同设计团队能够有效地处理复杂的设计紧张关系,这些紧张关系出现在愿景、方法和项目紧张关系的层面上,因为团队试图履行其对个人和集体转换的承诺。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry publishes articles that clarify, challenge, or reshape the prevailing understanding of factors in the prevention and correction of injustice and in the sustainable development of a humane and just society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信