Buprenorphine and postpartum contraception utilization among people with opioid use disorder: a multi-state analysis.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Kevin Y Xu, Jennifer K Bello, Joanna Buss, Hendrée E Jones, Laura J Bierut, Dustin Stwalley, Hannah S Szlyk, Caitlin E Martin, Jeannie C Kelly, Ebony B Carter, Elizabeth E Krans, Richard A Grucza
{"title":"Buprenorphine and postpartum contraception utilization among people with opioid use disorder: a multi-state analysis.","authors":"Kevin Y Xu, Jennifer K Bello, Joanna Buss, Hendrée E Jones, Laura J Bierut, Dustin Stwalley, Hannah S Szlyk, Caitlin E Martin, Jeannie C Kelly, Ebony B Carter, Elizabeth E Krans, Richard A Grucza","doi":"10.1186/s13722-024-00530-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The postpartum period provides an opportunity for birthing people with opioid use disorder (OUD) to consider their future reproductive health goals. However, the relationship between the use of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and contraception utilization is not well understood. We used multistate administrative claims data to compare contraception utilization rates among postpartum people with OUD initiating buprenorphine (BUP) versus no medication (psychosocial services receipt without MOUD (PSY)) in the United States (US).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from the Merative™ MarketScan<sup>®</sup> Multi-State Medicaid Databases 2016-2021 among postpartum women with OUD who did and did not initiate BUP during pregnancy. Our primary outcome was the receipt of prescribed highly-effective or effective contraception by 90 days postpartum. Highly-effective contraception was defined as female sterilization and long-acting reversible contraception [LARC]). Effective contraception was defined as oral contraceptive pills [OCPs], the contraceptive patch, ring, or injection. We used multivariable Poisson regression models, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, to measure the association of BUP (vs. PSY) on postpartum contraception utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our sample consisted of 11,118 postpartum people with OUD. Among those, 3,443 initiated BUP and 7,675 received PSY. By 90 days postpartum, 22.4% (n = 2,487) of the cohort were prescribed contraception (21.5% PSY vs. 24.3% BUP). Among these participants, most received LARC (41.0%), followed by female sterilization (27.3%), the contraceptive injection (17.3%), pills (8.6%), ring (4.7%), and patch (1.0%), Compared to people engaged in PSY, BUP receipt was associated with a greater use of prescribed contraceptive use by 90 days postpartum (adjusted relative risk [aRR] = 1.17[1.07-1.28]), including a modestly greater use of the patch, ring, and pills, (aRR = 1.13[1.08-1.18]), but a modestly lesser use of injection contraception (aRR = 0.95[0.91-0.99]). There was no relationship observed between BUP and LARC use (aRR = 1.00[0.95-1.04]) and female sterilization (aRR = 1.01[0.98-1.06]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Only 22% of pregnant people with OUD in our cohort used effective or highly-effective postpartum contraception. BUP receipt during pregnancy, relative to PSY, was associated with modestly greater use of prescribed effective contraceptive methods but was not associated with greater use of provider-administered contraceptive methods, such as the contraceptive injection, LARC and female sterilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":54223,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11702041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-024-00530-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The postpartum period provides an opportunity for birthing people with opioid use disorder (OUD) to consider their future reproductive health goals. However, the relationship between the use of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and contraception utilization is not well understood. We used multistate administrative claims data to compare contraception utilization rates among postpartum people with OUD initiating buprenorphine (BUP) versus no medication (psychosocial services receipt without MOUD (PSY)) in the United States (US).

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from the Merative™ MarketScan® Multi-State Medicaid Databases 2016-2021 among postpartum women with OUD who did and did not initiate BUP during pregnancy. Our primary outcome was the receipt of prescribed highly-effective or effective contraception by 90 days postpartum. Highly-effective contraception was defined as female sterilization and long-acting reversible contraception [LARC]). Effective contraception was defined as oral contraceptive pills [OCPs], the contraceptive patch, ring, or injection. We used multivariable Poisson regression models, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, to measure the association of BUP (vs. PSY) on postpartum contraception utilization.

Results: Our sample consisted of 11,118 postpartum people with OUD. Among those, 3,443 initiated BUP and 7,675 received PSY. By 90 days postpartum, 22.4% (n = 2,487) of the cohort were prescribed contraception (21.5% PSY vs. 24.3% BUP). Among these participants, most received LARC (41.0%), followed by female sterilization (27.3%), the contraceptive injection (17.3%), pills (8.6%), ring (4.7%), and patch (1.0%), Compared to people engaged in PSY, BUP receipt was associated with a greater use of prescribed contraceptive use by 90 days postpartum (adjusted relative risk [aRR] = 1.17[1.07-1.28]), including a modestly greater use of the patch, ring, and pills, (aRR = 1.13[1.08-1.18]), but a modestly lesser use of injection contraception (aRR = 0.95[0.91-0.99]). There was no relationship observed between BUP and LARC use (aRR = 1.00[0.95-1.04]) and female sterilization (aRR = 1.01[0.98-1.06]).

Conclusions: Only 22% of pregnant people with OUD in our cohort used effective or highly-effective postpartum contraception. BUP receipt during pregnancy, relative to PSY, was associated with modestly greater use of prescribed effective contraceptive methods but was not associated with greater use of provider-administered contraceptive methods, such as the contraceptive injection, LARC and female sterilization.

阿片类药物使用障碍患者丁丙诺啡和产后避孕使用:一项多状态分析。
背景:产后为阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者提供了一个考虑其未来生殖健康目标的机会。然而,阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)的药物使用与避孕利用之间的关系尚不清楚。我们使用多州行政索赔数据来比较美国产后OUD患者开始使用丁丙诺啡(BUP)与未使用药物(心理社会服务接收无mod (PSY))的避孕利用率。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们分析了2016-2021年Merative™MarketScan®多州医疗补助数据库中在怀孕期间实施和未实施BUP的产后OUD妇女的数据。我们的主要结局是在产后90天内收到处方的高效或有效的避孕措施。高效避孕被定义为女性绝育和长效可逆避孕[LARC]。有效避孕被定义为口服避孕药、避孕贴片、避孕环或注射剂。我们使用多变量泊松回归模型,调整社会人口学和临床特征,测量BUP (vs. PSY)与产后避孕措施利用的关系。结果:我们的样本包括11,118名产后OUD患者。其中3443人申请了BUP, 7675人申请了PSY。到产后90天,22.4% (n = 2487)的队列患者服用了处方避孕药(21.5%为PSY, 24.3%为BUP)。在这些参与者中,大多数接受LARC(41.0%),其次是女性节育(27.3%),避孕注射剂(17.3%),药丸(8.6%),环(4.7%)和贴片(1.0%)。与从事PSY的人相比,BUP接受与产后90天更多地使用处方避孕药相关(调整后的相对风险[aRR] = 1.17[1.07-1.28]),包括适度更多地使用贴片,环和药片,(aRR = 1.13[1.08-1.18])。但注射避孕的使用较少(aRR = 0.95[0.91-0.99])。BUP与LARC使用(aRR = 1.00[0.95-1.04])和女性绝育(aRR = 1.01[0.98-1.06])之间无相关性。结论:在我们的队列中,只有22%的OUD孕妇使用了有效或高效的产后避孕措施。怀孕期间接受BUP,相对于PSY,与更多地使用处方有效避孕方法相关,但与更多地使用提供者提供的避孕方法(如避孕注射、LARC和女性绝育)无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice provides a forum for clinically relevant research and perspectives that contribute to improving the quality of care for people with unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, or other drug use and addictive behaviours across a spectrum of clinical settings. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice accepts articles of clinical relevance related to the prevention and treatment of unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use across the spectrum of clinical settings. Topics of interest address issues related to the following: the spectrum of unhealthy use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs among the range of affected persons (e.g., not limited by age, race/ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation); the array of clinical prevention and treatment practices (from health messages, to identification and early intervention, to more extensive interventions including counseling and pharmacotherapy and other management strategies); and identification and management of medical, psychiatric, social, and other health consequences of substance use. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is particularly interested in articles that address how to improve the quality of care for people with unhealthy substance use and related conditions as described in the (US) Institute of Medicine report, Improving the Quality of Healthcare for Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006). Such articles address the quality of care and of health services. Although the journal also welcomes submissions that address these conditions in addiction speciality-treatment settings, the journal is particularly interested in including articles that address unhealthy use outside these settings, including experience with novel models of care and outcomes, and outcomes of research-practice collaborations. Although Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is generally not an outlet for basic science research, we will accept basic science research manuscripts that have clearly described potential clinical relevance and are accessible to audiences outside a narrow laboratory research field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信