Addressing inhaler technique challenges in cognitively impaired chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: the impact of customized training programs.

IF 1.1 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Vaishnavi V Gaonkar, Vinay V Shanbhag, Shreya S Kajave, Mahek R Mattikop, Mandati Santhosh Reddy
{"title":"Addressing inhaler technique challenges in cognitively impaired chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: the impact of customized training programs.","authors":"Vaishnavi V Gaonkar, Vinay V Shanbhag, Shreya S Kajave, Mahek R Mattikop, Mandati Santhosh Reddy","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2025.3213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cognitive impairment (CI) often face difficulties accurately administering inhalers, which are essential for managing their respiratory condition. Many elderly individuals make major errors that prevent proper medicine administration. Maintaining proper inhaler use skills is critical in controlling COPD. Our goal was to examine and evaluate the inhaler use skills of CI patients with COPD during both the initial evaluation and subsequent appointments. The Respiratory Department of KLEs Dr. Prabhakar Kore Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Nehru Nagar, Belagavi, Karnataka, India, was the site of this prospective interventional study. Based on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), a subset of patients with COPD exhibited mild CI. Patients exhibiting improper inhaler-using skills were detected, corrected, and trained. Inhaler techniques were reassessed immediately and at follow-up visits. The modified Medical Research Council scale score (mMRC), COPD assessment test (CAT) score, St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and pulmonary function tests were reassessed. A total of 56 COPD and CI patients who had made at least one significant mistake when using an inhaler device were added to the study. The mean age was 66.89±9.85 years. When evaluated with MoCA, the mean score was 17.02±3.91. At baseline, the mean number of mistakes was 1.38±0.93, which decreased to 0.54±0.57 after face-to-face demonstration of correct inhaler techniques. Correlational analysis revealed MoCA scores were negatively associated with the number of mistakes (r=-0.344). At follow-up, CAT score (25±5.61 vs. 18.48±5.24 p=0.001), SGRQ score (53.82±20.59 vs. 37.61±22.17 p=0.001), mMRC score (3.21±0.76 vs. 3.20±0.75 p=0.001), and forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity score (66.86±9.35 vs. 70.08±9.07 p=0.001) had significantly improved in patients demonstrating the correct technique. Pharmacist-led interventions demonstrated improvements in health-associated quality of life and therapeutic outcomes for individuals with COPD and CI. The study highlighted the importance of cognitive evaluation in routine COPD therapy, identifying potential impediments to effective therapy, and offering face-to-face presentations of inhaler techniques. The best inhalers and methods for COPD patients experiencing CI should be further investigated, according to the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2025.3213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cognitive impairment (CI) often face difficulties accurately administering inhalers, which are essential for managing their respiratory condition. Many elderly individuals make major errors that prevent proper medicine administration. Maintaining proper inhaler use skills is critical in controlling COPD. Our goal was to examine and evaluate the inhaler use skills of CI patients with COPD during both the initial evaluation and subsequent appointments. The Respiratory Department of KLEs Dr. Prabhakar Kore Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Nehru Nagar, Belagavi, Karnataka, India, was the site of this prospective interventional study. Based on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), a subset of patients with COPD exhibited mild CI. Patients exhibiting improper inhaler-using skills were detected, corrected, and trained. Inhaler techniques were reassessed immediately and at follow-up visits. The modified Medical Research Council scale score (mMRC), COPD assessment test (CAT) score, St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and pulmonary function tests were reassessed. A total of 56 COPD and CI patients who had made at least one significant mistake when using an inhaler device were added to the study. The mean age was 66.89±9.85 years. When evaluated with MoCA, the mean score was 17.02±3.91. At baseline, the mean number of mistakes was 1.38±0.93, which decreased to 0.54±0.57 after face-to-face demonstration of correct inhaler techniques. Correlational analysis revealed MoCA scores were negatively associated with the number of mistakes (r=-0.344). At follow-up, CAT score (25±5.61 vs. 18.48±5.24 p=0.001), SGRQ score (53.82±20.59 vs. 37.61±22.17 p=0.001), mMRC score (3.21±0.76 vs. 3.20±0.75 p=0.001), and forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity score (66.86±9.35 vs. 70.08±9.07 p=0.001) had significantly improved in patients demonstrating the correct technique. Pharmacist-led interventions demonstrated improvements in health-associated quality of life and therapeutic outcomes for individuals with COPD and CI. The study highlighted the importance of cognitive evaluation in routine COPD therapy, identifying potential impediments to effective therapy, and offering face-to-face presentations of inhaler techniques. The best inhalers and methods for COPD patients experiencing CI should be further investigated, according to the study.

解决慢性阻塞性肺疾病认知受损患者吸入器技术挑战:定制培训计划的影响。
患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和认知障碍(CI)的个体往往难以准确使用吸入器,而吸入器对于控制其呼吸系统疾病至关重要。许多老年人犯了严重的错误,妨碍了正确的用药。保持正确的吸入器使用技能对控制慢性阻塞性肺病至关重要。我们的目标是在初始评估和后续预约期间检查和评估CI合并COPD患者的吸入器使用技能。印度卡纳塔克邦Belagavi尼赫鲁纳加尔尼赫鲁纳加尔市克勒斯Prabhakar Kore医生医院和医学研究中心呼吸科是这项前瞻性介入研究的地点。根据蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA),一部分COPD患者表现出轻度CI。发现、纠正和培训吸入器使用技能不正确的患者。吸入器技术立即和在随访时重新评估。重新评估改良医学研究委员会量表评分(mMRC)、COPD评估测试(CAT)评分、圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)和肺功能测试。共有56名COPD和CI患者在使用吸入器装置时至少犯了一个重大错误。平均年龄66.89±9.85岁。MoCA评分平均为17.02±3.91分。在基线时,平均错误次数为1.38±0.93次,面对面演示正确吸入器技术后减少到0.54±0.57次。相关分析显示,MoCA得分与错误次数呈负相关(r=-0.344)。随访时,采用正确技术的患者CAT评分(25±5.61比18.48±5.24 p=0.001)、SGRQ评分(53.82±20.59比37.61±22.17 p=0.001)、mMRC评分(3.21±0.76比3.20±0.75 p=0.001)、1秒用力呼气量/用力肺活量评分(66.86±9.35比70.08±9.07 p=0.001)均显著改善。药剂师主导的干预表明,COPD和CI患者的健康相关生活质量和治疗结果有所改善。该研究强调了认知评估在常规COPD治疗中的重要性,确定了有效治疗的潜在障碍,并提供了吸入器技术的面对面介绍。根据这项研究,COPD患者经历CI的最佳吸入器和方法应进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信