Distributed Representations for Cognitive Control in Frontal Medial Cortex.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Thomas R Colin, Iris Ikink, Clay B Holroyd
{"title":"Distributed Representations for Cognitive Control in Frontal Medial Cortex.","authors":"Thomas R Colin, Iris Ikink, Clay B Holroyd","doi":"10.1162/jocn_a_02285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In natural and artificial neural networks, modularity and distributed structure afford complementary but competing benefits. The former allows for hierarchical representations that can flexibly recombine modules to address novel problems, whereas the latter can benefit from less constrained training, potentially uncovering fruitful statistical regularities. Here, we investigate these competing demands in the context of human sequential behavior. First, we explore this setting by comparing the properties of several recurrent neural network models. We find that explicit hierarchical structure by itself fails to provide a critical performance advantage when compared with a \"flat\" model that does not incorporate hierarchical structure. However, hierarchy appears to facilitate cognitive control processes that support nonroutine behaviors and behaviors that are carried out under computational stress. Second, we compare these models against fMRI data using representational similarity analysis. We find that a model that incorporates so-called wiring costs in the cost function, which produces a hierarchically organized gradient of representational structure across the hidden layer of the neural network, best accounts for fMRI data collected from human participants in a previous study [Holroyd, C. B., Ribas-Fernandes, J. J. F., Shahnazian, D., Silvetti, M., & Verguts, T., Human midcingulate cortex encodes distributed representations of task progress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 115, 6398-6403, 2018]. The results reveal that the ACC encodes distributed representations of sequential task context along a rostro-caudal gradient of abstraction: Rostral ACC encodes relatively abstract and temporally extended patterns of activity compared with those encoded by caudal ACC. These results provide insight into the role of ACC in motivation and cognitive control.</p>","PeriodicalId":51081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_02285","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In natural and artificial neural networks, modularity and distributed structure afford complementary but competing benefits. The former allows for hierarchical representations that can flexibly recombine modules to address novel problems, whereas the latter can benefit from less constrained training, potentially uncovering fruitful statistical regularities. Here, we investigate these competing demands in the context of human sequential behavior. First, we explore this setting by comparing the properties of several recurrent neural network models. We find that explicit hierarchical structure by itself fails to provide a critical performance advantage when compared with a "flat" model that does not incorporate hierarchical structure. However, hierarchy appears to facilitate cognitive control processes that support nonroutine behaviors and behaviors that are carried out under computational stress. Second, we compare these models against fMRI data using representational similarity analysis. We find that a model that incorporates so-called wiring costs in the cost function, which produces a hierarchically organized gradient of representational structure across the hidden layer of the neural network, best accounts for fMRI data collected from human participants in a previous study [Holroyd, C. B., Ribas-Fernandes, J. J. F., Shahnazian, D., Silvetti, M., & Verguts, T., Human midcingulate cortex encodes distributed representations of task progress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 115, 6398-6403, 2018]. The results reveal that the ACC encodes distributed representations of sequential task context along a rostro-caudal gradient of abstraction: Rostral ACC encodes relatively abstract and temporally extended patterns of activity compared with those encoded by caudal ACC. These results provide insight into the role of ACC in motivation and cognitive control.

额叶内侧皮层认知控制的分布表征。
在自然神经网络和人工神经网络中,模块化和分布式结构具有互补但又相互竞争的优势。前者允许分层表示,可以灵活地重组模块以解决新问题,而后者可以从较少约束的训练中受益,潜在地揭示富有成效的统计规律。在这里,我们在人类顺序行为的背景下研究这些竞争需求。首先,我们通过比较几个递归神经网络模型的性质来探索这种设置。我们发现,与不包含层次结构的“扁平”模型相比,明确的层次结构本身并不能提供关键的性能优势。然而,层次结构似乎促进了支持非常规行为和在计算压力下进行的行为的认知控制过程。其次,我们使用表征相似性分析将这些模型与fMRI数据进行比较。我们发现,将所谓的连接成本纳入成本函数的模型,该模型在神经网络的隐藏层中产生分层组织的表征结构梯度,最好地解释了先前研究中从人类参与者收集的fMRI数据[Holroyd, c.b, Ribas-Fernandes, j.j.f, Shahnazian, D, Silvetti, M., & Verguts, T.,人类中扣带皮层编码任务进度的分布式表征。中国科学院学报,2016,33(5):698 -6403,2018。结果表明,前扣带皮层编码顺序任务上下文的分布表征,沿背侧-尾侧的抽象梯度:与尾侧前扣带皮层编码的活动模式相比,吻侧前扣带皮层编码的是相对抽象和时间扩展的活动模式。这些结果为ACC在动机和认知控制中的作用提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
151
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience investigates brain–behavior interaction and promotes lively interchange among the mind sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信