A Systems Approach to Improving Well-Being in Graduate Medical Education.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Bryant Adibe, Lawrence Brown, Alison Goulder, Elizabeth Lee, Leena Owen, William Roberts, Gabrielle Yarru
{"title":"A Systems Approach to Improving Well-Being in Graduate Medical Education.","authors":"Bryant Adibe, Lawrence Brown, Alison Goulder, Elizabeth Lee, Leena Owen, William Roberts, Gabrielle Yarru","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The imperative to improve the well-being of graduate medical education (GME) trainees has been well documented. While existing interventions have largely centered on increasing individual trainee resilience, less focus has been on the role of national health policy, economics, and the overall U.S. care delivery system in acting as antecedent contributors to burnout among learners. To explore the impact of these national system level factors, Princeton University hosted the Systems Summit on Clinical Wellbeing in October 2023. Co-sponsored by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, American Medical Association, and Healing Works Foundation, the event brought together thought leaders, policymakers, and experts from a myriad of backgrounds, including GME leaders and trainees.Through a systems lens, summit attendees identified opportunities and barriers for well-being at both the national and health care organization levels. At the national level, identified barriers included historical national policy decisions, longstanding economic pressures in health care, and their combined cumulative impact on trainees. At the health care organization level, trainees pointed to an incongruity between common institutional wellness offerings and their more immediate support needs, along with unsustainable workload expectations, including the added toll of non-physician tasks (e.g., scheduling). A lack of appropriate tools for assessing well-being through a systems lens further compounds these issues. More actionable outputs may be achievable through the integration of operationally oriented well-being metrics (e.g., clinical and academic workload hours, call frequency, stay intent).Long overdue updates to ill-fated national policy decisions, along with a redirection of the focus of GME well-being efforts at the programmatic level, could, in combination, fundamentally reshape the experience of trainees, contributing to lower incidences of depression, exhaustion, and burnout.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005969","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The imperative to improve the well-being of graduate medical education (GME) trainees has been well documented. While existing interventions have largely centered on increasing individual trainee resilience, less focus has been on the role of national health policy, economics, and the overall U.S. care delivery system in acting as antecedent contributors to burnout among learners. To explore the impact of these national system level factors, Princeton University hosted the Systems Summit on Clinical Wellbeing in October 2023. Co-sponsored by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, American Medical Association, and Healing Works Foundation, the event brought together thought leaders, policymakers, and experts from a myriad of backgrounds, including GME leaders and trainees.Through a systems lens, summit attendees identified opportunities and barriers for well-being at both the national and health care organization levels. At the national level, identified barriers included historical national policy decisions, longstanding economic pressures in health care, and their combined cumulative impact on trainees. At the health care organization level, trainees pointed to an incongruity between common institutional wellness offerings and their more immediate support needs, along with unsustainable workload expectations, including the added toll of non-physician tasks (e.g., scheduling). A lack of appropriate tools for assessing well-being through a systems lens further compounds these issues. More actionable outputs may be achievable through the integration of operationally oriented well-being metrics (e.g., clinical and academic workload hours, call frequency, stay intent).Long overdue updates to ill-fated national policy decisions, along with a redirection of the focus of GME well-being efforts at the programmatic level, could, in combination, fundamentally reshape the experience of trainees, contributing to lower incidences of depression, exhaustion, and burnout.

提高研究生医学教育幸福感的系统方法。
摘要:提高医学研究生教育(GME)受训者幸福感的必要性已得到充分证明。虽然现有的干预措施主要集中在提高受训人员的个人适应能力上,但很少关注国家卫生政策、经济和整个美国医疗服务系统在学习者倦怠中所起的作用。为了探索这些国家系统层面因素的影响,普林斯顿大学于2023年10月主办了临床健康系统峰会。该活动由研究生医学教育认证委员会、美国医学协会和治疗工作基金会共同主办,汇集了来自各种背景的思想领袖、政策制定者和专家,包括GME领导人和学员。通过系统的视角,峰会与会者确定了国家和卫生保健组织两级实现福祉的机会和障碍。在国家一级,确定的障碍包括历史上的国家政策决定、保健方面长期存在的经济压力及其对受训者的综合累积影响。在卫生保健组织层面,受训者指出,常见的机构健康服务与他们更直接的支持需求之间存在不协调,以及不可持续的工作量预期,包括非医生任务(例如,调度)的额外费用。缺乏通过系统视角评估福祉的适当工具使这些问题进一步复杂化。通过整合面向业务的福利指标(例如,临床和学术工作量小时数、呼叫频率、逗留意向),可以实现更多可操作的产出。对命运多端的国家政策决定进行早该进行的更新,以及在方案层面重新调整GME福利工作的重点,可以从根本上重塑受训人员的经历,有助于降低抑郁、疲惫和倦怠的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信