Post-laparoscopic Shoulder Pain Management: A Narrative Review.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yan Zhao, Wen Xin, Xiaohui Luo
{"title":"Post-laparoscopic Shoulder Pain Management: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Yan Zhao, Wen Xin, Xiaohui Luo","doi":"10.1007/s11916-024-01355-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Post-laparoscopic shoulder pain (PLSP) can slow patient recovery and extend hospital stays, making its management crucial for patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Current consensus guidelines say little about how to prevent or manage PLSP. In this context, a multimodal approach to PLSP management that maybe extend beyond the pharmaceutical interventions currently employed. A variety of devices comprising both invasive and noninvasive approaches are available to patients, serving as adjuvants to analgesics. In this review, we explore the potential causes of PLSP. Additionally, by searching relevant databases and reviewing existing literature, we provide a comprehensive summary of current PLSP management strategies excluding analgesics.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A total of 30 articles were reviewed. The review identified a number of different treatments for PLSP, including trendelenburg position, discharge of residual gas, pulmonary recruitment manoeuvre, low-pressure pneumoperitoneum and phrenic nerve block, among others. However, the inconsistencies in the study designs resulted in disparate conclusions. While the current studies provide valuable insights, there is a clear need for further research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11711571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-024-01355-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Post-laparoscopic shoulder pain (PLSP) can slow patient recovery and extend hospital stays, making its management crucial for patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Current consensus guidelines say little about how to prevent or manage PLSP. In this context, a multimodal approach to PLSP management that maybe extend beyond the pharmaceutical interventions currently employed. A variety of devices comprising both invasive and noninvasive approaches are available to patients, serving as adjuvants to analgesics. In this review, we explore the potential causes of PLSP. Additionally, by searching relevant databases and reviewing existing literature, we provide a comprehensive summary of current PLSP management strategies excluding analgesics.

Recent findings: A total of 30 articles were reviewed. The review identified a number of different treatments for PLSP, including trendelenburg position, discharge of residual gas, pulmonary recruitment manoeuvre, low-pressure pneumoperitoneum and phrenic nerve block, among others. However, the inconsistencies in the study designs resulted in disparate conclusions. While the current studies provide valuable insights, there is a clear need for further research in this area.

后腹腔镜肩部疼痛管理:叙述性回顾。
回顾目的:腹腔镜后肩痛(PLSP)可减缓患者恢复并延长住院时间,使其管理对腹腔镜手术患者至关重要。目前的共识指导方针很少提及如何预防或管理PLSP。在这种情况下,PLSP管理的多模式方法可能超出目前采用的药物干预措施。包括侵入性和非侵入性方法的各种设备可供患者使用,作为止痛剂的辅助剂。在这篇综述中,我们探讨了PLSP的潜在原因。此外,通过检索相关数据库和回顾现有文献,我们提供了目前PLSP管理策略的综合总结,不包括镇痛药。最近发现:共回顾了30篇文章。该综述确定了许多不同的PLSP治疗方法,包括trendelenburg体位、残余气体排放、肺复吸术、低压气腹和膈神经阻滞等。然而,研究设计的不一致性导致了不同的结论。虽然目前的研究提供了有价值的见解,但显然需要在该领域进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Pain and Headache Reports
Current Pain and Headache Reports CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published clinical findings regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and management of pain and headache. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care and prevention of pain and headache. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as anesthetic techniques in pain management, cluster headache, neuropathic pain, and migraine. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信