Early identification of potentially reversible cancer cachexia using explainable machine learning driven by body weight dynamics: a multicenter cohort study.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Liangyu Yin, Na Li, Xin Lin, Ling Zhang, Yang Fan, Jie Liu, Zongliang Lu, Wei Li, Jiuwei Cui, Zengqing Guo, Qinghua Yao, Fuxiang Zhou, Ming Liu, Zhikang Chen, Huiqing Yu, Tao Li, Zengning Li, Pingping Jia, Chunhua Song, Hanping Shi, Hongxia Xu
{"title":"Early identification of potentially reversible cancer cachexia using explainable machine learning driven by body weight dynamics: a multicenter cohort study.","authors":"Liangyu Yin, Na Li, Xin Lin, Ling Zhang, Yang Fan, Jie Liu, Zongliang Lu, Wei Li, Jiuwei Cui, Zengqing Guo, Qinghua Yao, Fuxiang Zhou, Ming Liu, Zhikang Chen, Huiqing Yu, Tao Li, Zengning Li, Pingping Jia, Chunhua Song, Hanping Shi, Hongxia Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.01.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cachexia is associated with multiple adverse outcomes in cancer. However, clinical decision-making for oncology patients at the cachexia stage presents significant challenges.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to develop a machine learning (ML) model to identify potentially reversible cancer cachexia (PRCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter cohort study. Cachexia was retrospectively diagnosed using Fearon's framework. PRCC was defined as a diagnosis of cancer cachexia at baseline that turned negative 1 mo later. Body weight dynamics accessible upon patient admission were screened and modeled to predict PRCC. Multiple ML models were trained and cross-validated using 70% of the data to predict PRCC, with the remaining 30% reserved for model evaluation. The interpretability and clinical usefulness of the optimal model were assessed, and external validation was performed in an independent cohort of 238 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study enrolled 1983 men and 1784 women (median age = 58 y). PRCC was identified in 1983 patients (52.6%). Breast cancer exhibited the highest rate of PRCC (72.1%), whereas cachexia associated with various gastrointestinal cancers was less likely to be reversed. Weight change (WC) from 6 mo ago to 1 mo ago, WC from 1 mo ago to baseline (-1 to 0), and baseline body mass index were selected for modeling. A multilayer perceptron model showed good performance to predict PRCC in the holdout test set [area under the curve (95% confidence interval): 0.887 (0.866, 0.907); accuracy: 0.836; sensitivity: 0.859; specificity: 0.812] and the external validation set [area under the curve (95% confidence interval): 0.863 (0.778, 0.948)]. The WC -1 to 0 showed the highest impact on model output. The model was demonstrated to be clinically useful and statistically relevant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study presents an explainable ML model for the early identification of PRCC that utilizes simple body weight dynamics. The findings showcase the potential of this approach in improving the management of cancer cachexia to optimize patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.01.006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cachexia is associated with multiple adverse outcomes in cancer. However, clinical decision-making for oncology patients at the cachexia stage presents significant challenges.

Objectives: This study aims to develop a machine learning (ML) model to identify potentially reversible cancer cachexia (PRCC).

Methods: This was a multicenter cohort study. Cachexia was retrospectively diagnosed using Fearon's framework. PRCC was defined as a diagnosis of cancer cachexia at baseline that turned negative 1 mo later. Body weight dynamics accessible upon patient admission were screened and modeled to predict PRCC. Multiple ML models were trained and cross-validated using 70% of the data to predict PRCC, with the remaining 30% reserved for model evaluation. The interpretability and clinical usefulness of the optimal model were assessed, and external validation was performed in an independent cohort of 238 patients.

Results: The study enrolled 1983 men and 1784 women (median age = 58 y). PRCC was identified in 1983 patients (52.6%). Breast cancer exhibited the highest rate of PRCC (72.1%), whereas cachexia associated with various gastrointestinal cancers was less likely to be reversed. Weight change (WC) from 6 mo ago to 1 mo ago, WC from 1 mo ago to baseline (-1 to 0), and baseline body mass index were selected for modeling. A multilayer perceptron model showed good performance to predict PRCC in the holdout test set [area under the curve (95% confidence interval): 0.887 (0.866, 0.907); accuracy: 0.836; sensitivity: 0.859; specificity: 0.812] and the external validation set [area under the curve (95% confidence interval): 0.863 (0.778, 0.948)]. The WC -1 to 0 showed the highest impact on model output. The model was demonstrated to be clinically useful and statistically relevant.

Conclusions: This study presents an explainable ML model for the early identification of PRCC that utilizes simple body weight dynamics. The findings showcase the potential of this approach in improving the management of cancer cachexia to optimize patient outcomes.

使用体重动态驱动的可解释机器学习早期识别潜在可逆的癌症恶病质:一项多中心队列研究
背景:恶病质与多种癌症不良结局相关。然而,临床决策的肿瘤患者在恶病质阶段提出了重大挑战。目的:本研究旨在建立一种机器学习(ML)模型来识别潜在可逆性癌症恶病质(PRCC)。方法:这是一项多中心队列研究。采用Fearon框架回顾性诊断恶病质。PRCC被定义为基线诊断为癌症恶病质,一个月后变为阴性。对患者入院时可获得的体重动态进行筛选和建模,以预测PRCC。使用70%的数据对多个ML模型进行训练和交叉验证,以预测PRCC,其余30%用于模型评估。评估了最佳模型的可解释性和临床有效性,并在238例患者的独立队列中进行了外部验证。结果:该研究纳入了1983名男性和1784名女性(中位年龄=58岁)。确诊PRCC 1983例(52.6%)。乳腺癌PRCC发生率最高(72.1%),而恶病质相关的各种胃肠道癌症不太可能逆转。选取六个月前至一个月前的体重变化(WC)、一个月前至基线(-1至0)的WC和基线体重指数进行建模。多层感知器模型在holdout测试集(AUC [95%CI] = 0.887[0.866, 0.907],准确率=0.836,灵敏度=0.859,特异性=0.812)和外部验证集(AUC [95%CI] = 0.863[0.778, 0.948])中均表现出良好的预测效果。WC -1到0对模型输出的影响最大。该模型被证明具有临床实用性和统计学相关性。结论:本研究提出了一个可解释的ML模型,用于早期识别PRCC,利用简单的体重动力学。研究结果显示了这种方法在改善癌症恶病质管理以优化患者预后方面的潜力。注册信息:文章中描述的数据来源于已注册的研究项目(URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=31813;ID: ChiCTR1800020329)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
332
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition is recognized as the most highly rated peer-reviewed, primary research journal in nutrition and dietetics.It focuses on publishing the latest research on various topics in nutrition, including but not limited to obesity, vitamins and minerals, nutrition and disease, and energy metabolism. Purpose: The purpose of AJCN is to: Publish original research studies relevant to human and clinical nutrition. Consider well-controlled clinical studies describing scientific mechanisms, efficacy, and safety of dietary interventions in the context of disease prevention or health benefits. Encourage public health and epidemiologic studies relevant to human nutrition. Promote innovative investigations of nutritional questions employing epigenetic, genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches. Include solicited editorials, book reviews, solicited or unsolicited review articles, invited controversy position papers, and letters to the Editor related to prior AJCN articles. Peer Review Process: All submitted material with scientific content undergoes peer review by the Editors or their designees before acceptance for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信