Non-Invasive Cardiac and Vascular Monitoring in Systemic Sclerosis: Impact of Therapy on Subclinical Dysfunction.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ștefania Lucia Magda, Ana Maria Gheorghiu, Raluca Ileana Mincu, Andrea Olivia Ciobanu, Tudor Constantinescu, Elisa Cristina Popa, Carina Mihai, Dragoș Vinereanu
{"title":"Non-Invasive Cardiac and Vascular Monitoring in Systemic Sclerosis: Impact of Therapy on Subclinical Dysfunction.","authors":"Ștefania Lucia Magda, Ana Maria Gheorghiu, Raluca Ileana Mincu, Andrea Olivia Ciobanu, Tudor Constantinescu, Elisa Cristina Popa, Carina Mihai, Dragoș Vinereanu","doi":"10.3390/medicina60122080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and objectives</i>: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) causes myocardial and microvascular impairment, with subclinical dysfunction and eventually permanent cardio-vascular damage. The long-term influence of SSc therapies on subclinical cardiovascular dysfunction is insufficiently investigated. We aimed to assess 2D and 4D cardiac ultrasound parameters of heart function in patients with different forms of SSc versus controls and to determine the evolution of cardiac function and arterial stiffness parameters under therapy. <i>Materials and methods</i>: A total of 60 subjects with SSc were studied at baseline; 30 SSc patients were compared to 30 matched controls. A total of 52 SSc subjects were reassessed after 1 year and 30 after 2 years of treatment. Cardiac function was evaluated through 2D standard echocardiography, tissue Doppler, speckle tracking and 4D auto LV quantification echo. Arterial stiffness was determined via the cardio-ankle vascular index and ankle brachial index. <i>Results</i>: At baseline, the standard echo parameters were normal. The 4D and myocardial work parameters, although in normal limits, were significantly altered in the SSc group vs. controls (4D ejection fraction 54.5 ± 8.5% in SSc vs. 63.8 ± 3.1% in controls; 4D longitudinal strain -14.2 ± 2.4% in SSc vs. -22.0 ± 2.7% in controls; global constructive work 2124.2 ± 449.5 mmHg% in SSc vs. 3102.8 ± 337.5 mmHg% in controls, for all <i>p</i> ≤ 0.02). Both at 1 year and 2 years of treatment, all echo and arterial stiffness parameters were similar to baseline, with no correlation to treatment type. <i>Conclusions</i>: SSc determines subclinical systolic dysfunction. Non-invasive assessment methods do not detect a functional cardiovascular decline in patients on classical therapy. Complex cardiac follow-up should be implemented in cases at risk for complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":49830,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-Lithuania","volume":"60 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11678526/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-Lithuania","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60122080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) causes myocardial and microvascular impairment, with subclinical dysfunction and eventually permanent cardio-vascular damage. The long-term influence of SSc therapies on subclinical cardiovascular dysfunction is insufficiently investigated. We aimed to assess 2D and 4D cardiac ultrasound parameters of heart function in patients with different forms of SSc versus controls and to determine the evolution of cardiac function and arterial stiffness parameters under therapy. Materials and methods: A total of 60 subjects with SSc were studied at baseline; 30 SSc patients were compared to 30 matched controls. A total of 52 SSc subjects were reassessed after 1 year and 30 after 2 years of treatment. Cardiac function was evaluated through 2D standard echocardiography, tissue Doppler, speckle tracking and 4D auto LV quantification echo. Arterial stiffness was determined via the cardio-ankle vascular index and ankle brachial index. Results: At baseline, the standard echo parameters were normal. The 4D and myocardial work parameters, although in normal limits, were significantly altered in the SSc group vs. controls (4D ejection fraction 54.5 ± 8.5% in SSc vs. 63.8 ± 3.1% in controls; 4D longitudinal strain -14.2 ± 2.4% in SSc vs. -22.0 ± 2.7% in controls; global constructive work 2124.2 ± 449.5 mmHg% in SSc vs. 3102.8 ± 337.5 mmHg% in controls, for all p ≤ 0.02). Both at 1 year and 2 years of treatment, all echo and arterial stiffness parameters were similar to baseline, with no correlation to treatment type. Conclusions: SSc determines subclinical systolic dysfunction. Non-invasive assessment methods do not detect a functional cardiovascular decline in patients on classical therapy. Complex cardiac follow-up should be implemented in cases at risk for complications.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicina-Lithuania
Medicina-Lithuania 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1578
审稿时长
25.04 days
期刊介绍: The journal’s main focus is on reviews as well as clinical and experimental investigations. The journal aims to advance knowledge related to problems in medicine in developing countries as well as developed economies, to disseminate research on global health, and to promote and foster prevention and treatment of diseases worldwide. MEDICINA publications cater to clinicians, diagnosticians and researchers, and serve as a forum to discuss the current status of health-related matters and their impact on a global and local scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信