Effect of Preoperative Oral Antibiotics for Prevention of Incisional Surgical Site Infection After Colorectal Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ryo Nakanishi, Heita Ozawa, Naoyuki Toyota, Minori Mise, Shin Fujita
{"title":"Effect of Preoperative Oral Antibiotics for Prevention of Incisional Surgical Site Infection After Colorectal Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Study.","authors":"Ryo Nakanishi, Heita Ozawa, Naoyuki Toyota, Minori Mise, Shin Fujita","doi":"10.3390/medicina60121970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives:</i> Recent findings suggest that combining mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) and preoperative oral antibiotics (OAs) decreases the risk of incisional surgical site infections (iSSIs) in colorectal surgery; however, this finding remains controversial. This study examined the efficacy of OAs and MBP in colorectal surgery using propensity score matching (PSM). <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Between January 2015 and December 2020, 559 patients with colorectal tumors underwent MBP followed by colorectal surgery. The multivariate analysis used a COX proportional hazards model to extract risk factors for iSSI. PSM was performed to balance the impact of potential co-factors of OAs with MBP (OA) and MBP alone (non-OA) on superficial SSI incidence. <i>Results</i>: The multivariate analysis identified non-OA use as an independent risk factor for iSSIs (odds ratio [OR]: 2.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-4.88, <i>p</i> = 0.0112). After matching the cohort, both OA and non-OA groups were divided into 217 cases each. The incisional SSI rate was significantly lower in the OA group (<i>n</i> = 338) than in the non-OA group (1.61% vs. 5.07%; OR 3.4; 95% CI; 0.123-0.707; <i>p</i> = 0.0062). <i>Conclusions</i>: This study revealed that OAs with MBP markedly reduced SSI rates. OAs with MBP should be adopted in colorectal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49830,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-Lithuania","volume":"60 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11676587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-Lithuania","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60121970","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Recent findings suggest that combining mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) and preoperative oral antibiotics (OAs) decreases the risk of incisional surgical site infections (iSSIs) in colorectal surgery; however, this finding remains controversial. This study examined the efficacy of OAs and MBP in colorectal surgery using propensity score matching (PSM). Materials and Methods: Between January 2015 and December 2020, 559 patients with colorectal tumors underwent MBP followed by colorectal surgery. The multivariate analysis used a COX proportional hazards model to extract risk factors for iSSI. PSM was performed to balance the impact of potential co-factors of OAs with MBP (OA) and MBP alone (non-OA) on superficial SSI incidence. Results: The multivariate analysis identified non-OA use as an independent risk factor for iSSIs (odds ratio [OR]: 2.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-4.88, p = 0.0112). After matching the cohort, both OA and non-OA groups were divided into 217 cases each. The incisional SSI rate was significantly lower in the OA group (n = 338) than in the non-OA group (1.61% vs. 5.07%; OR 3.4; 95% CI; 0.123-0.707; p = 0.0062). Conclusions: This study revealed that OAs with MBP markedly reduced SSI rates. OAs with MBP should be adopted in colorectal surgery.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicina-Lithuania
Medicina-Lithuania 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1578
审稿时长
25.04 days
期刊介绍: The journal’s main focus is on reviews as well as clinical and experimental investigations. The journal aims to advance knowledge related to problems in medicine in developing countries as well as developed economies, to disseminate research on global health, and to promote and foster prevention and treatment of diseases worldwide. MEDICINA publications cater to clinicians, diagnosticians and researchers, and serve as a forum to discuss the current status of health-related matters and their impact on a global and local scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信