Effect of Preoperative Oral Antibiotics for Prevention of Incisional Surgical Site Infection After Colorectal Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Study.
{"title":"Effect of Preoperative Oral Antibiotics for Prevention of Incisional Surgical Site Infection After Colorectal Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Study.","authors":"Ryo Nakanishi, Heita Ozawa, Naoyuki Toyota, Minori Mise, Shin Fujita","doi":"10.3390/medicina60121970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives:</i> Recent findings suggest that combining mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) and preoperative oral antibiotics (OAs) decreases the risk of incisional surgical site infections (iSSIs) in colorectal surgery; however, this finding remains controversial. This study examined the efficacy of OAs and MBP in colorectal surgery using propensity score matching (PSM). <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Between January 2015 and December 2020, 559 patients with colorectal tumors underwent MBP followed by colorectal surgery. The multivariate analysis used a COX proportional hazards model to extract risk factors for iSSI. PSM was performed to balance the impact of potential co-factors of OAs with MBP (OA) and MBP alone (non-OA) on superficial SSI incidence. <i>Results</i>: The multivariate analysis identified non-OA use as an independent risk factor for iSSIs (odds ratio [OR]: 2.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-4.88, <i>p</i> = 0.0112). After matching the cohort, both OA and non-OA groups were divided into 217 cases each. The incisional SSI rate was significantly lower in the OA group (<i>n</i> = 338) than in the non-OA group (1.61% vs. 5.07%; OR 3.4; 95% CI; 0.123-0.707; <i>p</i> = 0.0062). <i>Conclusions</i>: This study revealed that OAs with MBP markedly reduced SSI rates. OAs with MBP should be adopted in colorectal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49830,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-Lithuania","volume":"60 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11676587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-Lithuania","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60121970","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Recent findings suggest that combining mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) and preoperative oral antibiotics (OAs) decreases the risk of incisional surgical site infections (iSSIs) in colorectal surgery; however, this finding remains controversial. This study examined the efficacy of OAs and MBP in colorectal surgery using propensity score matching (PSM). Materials and Methods: Between January 2015 and December 2020, 559 patients with colorectal tumors underwent MBP followed by colorectal surgery. The multivariate analysis used a COX proportional hazards model to extract risk factors for iSSI. PSM was performed to balance the impact of potential co-factors of OAs with MBP (OA) and MBP alone (non-OA) on superficial SSI incidence. Results: The multivariate analysis identified non-OA use as an independent risk factor for iSSIs (odds ratio [OR]: 2.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-4.88, p = 0.0112). After matching the cohort, both OA and non-OA groups were divided into 217 cases each. The incisional SSI rate was significantly lower in the OA group (n = 338) than in the non-OA group (1.61% vs. 5.07%; OR 3.4; 95% CI; 0.123-0.707; p = 0.0062). Conclusions: This study revealed that OAs with MBP markedly reduced SSI rates. OAs with MBP should be adopted in colorectal surgery.
期刊介绍:
The journal’s main focus is on reviews as well as clinical and experimental investigations. The journal aims to advance knowledge related to problems in medicine in developing countries as well as developed economies, to disseminate research on global health, and to promote and foster prevention and treatment of diseases worldwide. MEDICINA publications cater to clinicians, diagnosticians and researchers, and serve as a forum to discuss the current status of health-related matters and their impact on a global and local scale.