Comprehensive assessment as part of the assistive technology service delivery process.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Rina Juel Kaptain, Michelle Riisager, Christina Juul, Morten Rye Olsen, Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens
{"title":"Comprehensive assessment as part of the assistive technology service delivery process.","authors":"Rina Juel Kaptain, Michelle Riisager, Christina Juul, Morten Rye Olsen, Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens","doi":"10.1080/11038128.2025.2451287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The assistive technology (AT) service delivery process is complex and includes a comprehensive assessment of the citizen's situation to inform decision making. This assessment is required by Danish law to ensure that citizens receive solutions matched to their needs, including other services than the AT.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate how Danish occupational therapists, involved in the AT service delivery process, perform the comprehensive assessment.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study is a cross-sectional survey. The target population was occupational therapists providing AT through the AT service delivery process in municipal units. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included <i>n</i> = 206 Danish occupational therapists completing the questionnaire. Participants represented the five regions in Denmark. Variations were seen across age, years of working experience, and years in current position. Fifty nine percent of the participants often used telephone interviews, and 74% reported to do home visits to gather information as part of the assessment process. During home visits, participants typically combined methods of interview and observation. Most participants reported not using standardised assessment tools, or not using them in their full length. Almost 80% reported having no guidelines about tool(s) to be used at their workplace. Overall, participants were satisfied with the assessment process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When Danish occupational therapists perform comprehensive assessments to ensure that citizens receive solutions matched to their needs, including other services than the AT, the assessment approach and methods employed vary across therapists, since local guidelines for assessment and the use of standardised assessment tools are sparse.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>To support a high-quality comprehensive assessment process, also ensuring a sustainable client-centred process, a standard minimum guideline is recommended within the Danish AT service delivery system.</p>","PeriodicalId":49570,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"32 1","pages":"2451287"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2025.2451287","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The assistive technology (AT) service delivery process is complex and includes a comprehensive assessment of the citizen's situation to inform decision making. This assessment is required by Danish law to ensure that citizens receive solutions matched to their needs, including other services than the AT.

Aim: To investigate how Danish occupational therapists, involved in the AT service delivery process, perform the comprehensive assessment.

Material and methods: The study is a cross-sectional survey. The target population was occupational therapists providing AT through the AT service delivery process in municipal units. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.

Results: The sample included n = 206 Danish occupational therapists completing the questionnaire. Participants represented the five regions in Denmark. Variations were seen across age, years of working experience, and years in current position. Fifty nine percent of the participants often used telephone interviews, and 74% reported to do home visits to gather information as part of the assessment process. During home visits, participants typically combined methods of interview and observation. Most participants reported not using standardised assessment tools, or not using them in their full length. Almost 80% reported having no guidelines about tool(s) to be used at their workplace. Overall, participants were satisfied with the assessment process.

Conclusions: When Danish occupational therapists perform comprehensive assessments to ensure that citizens receive solutions matched to their needs, including other services than the AT, the assessment approach and methods employed vary across therapists, since local guidelines for assessment and the use of standardised assessment tools are sparse.

Significance: To support a high-quality comprehensive assessment process, also ensuring a sustainable client-centred process, a standard minimum guideline is recommended within the Danish AT service delivery system.

综合评估作为辅助技术服务交付过程的一部分。
背景:辅助技术(AT)服务的提供过程是复杂的,包括对公民情况的全面评估,以告知决策。丹麦法律要求进行评估,以确保公民获得符合其需求的解决方案,包括AT以外的其他服务。目的:研究丹麦职业治疗师在辅助治疗服务提供过程中如何进行综合评估。材料与方法:本研究为横断面调查。目标人群是在市政单位通过辅助治疗服务提供过程提供辅助治疗的职业治疗师。数据分析采用描述性统计。结果:样本包括n = 206名完成问卷的丹麦职业治疗师。与会者代表丹麦的五个区域。不同年龄、不同工作经验和不同工作年限的人的表现也不同。59%的参与者经常使用电话访谈,74%的人报告说,作为评估过程的一部分,他们会进行家访以收集信息。在家访期间,参与者通常采用访谈和观察相结合的方法。大多数参与者报告没有使用标准化评估工具,或者没有充分使用它们。几乎80%的人报告说,他们没有关于工作场所使用工具的指导方针。总体而言,参与者对评估过程感到满意。结论:当丹麦职业治疗师进行全面评估以确保公民获得符合其需求的解决方案时,包括AT以外的其他服务,由于当地评估指南和标准化评估工具的使用很少,因此不同治疗师采用的评估方法和方法各不相同。意义:为了支持高质量的综合评估过程,同时确保可持续的以客户为中心的过程,建议在丹麦AT服务提供系统中制定标准的最低准则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy is an internationally well-recognized journal that aims to provide a forum for occupational therapy research worldwide and especially the Nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy welcomes: theoretical frameworks, original research reports emanating from quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies, literature reviews, case studies, presentation and evaluation of instruments, evaluation of interventions, learning and teaching in OT, letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信