Evaluation of Swallowing Dysfunction With Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing in the Neonatal Unit.

Abstract

Background: Preterm and low-birth-weight infants often experience discoordination of the suck-swallow-breathe pattern, leading to dysrhythmic feeding, inefficient feeding skills, and swallowing dysfunction, increasing the risk of aspiration and respiratory morbidity. While videofluoroscopic swallowing study is commonly utilized to assess swallow function in neonates, flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) has been an emerging modality and has been utilized routinely at our institution since 2018.

Method: A single-center, retrospective study including 90 infants admitted to the neonatal unit between 2018-2023 who underwent FEES procedure. Our objective was to evaluate the utility of FEES for evaluating functional and anatomical abnormalities, secretions, penetration/aspiration, and residue in infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Our secondary objective was to observe whether clinical feeding decisions were changed based on FEES and describe progress in oral feeding.

Results: A majority of infants (85.5%) were reported to have abnormal FEES findings, with aspiration below the vocal cords noted in 37.7% and laryngeal penetration reported in 34.5% of the infants. Anatomical abnormalities were reported in 39% of infants including predominantly laryngomalacia (27.7%). Ten infants were noted to have unanticipated anatomical abnormalities, of which four went on to require surgical interventions. Changes in nipple or bottle were the most frequent recommendations (68.8%) with thickening of feeds recommended in 35% of infants. The percentage of oral feedings increased from median of 45% to 75% with a decrease in infants with apneic, bradycardic, and desaturation events in the 7 days after FEES guided interventions were introduced.

Conclusions: Majority of the infants with clinical concerns of swallow dysfunction were noted to have abnormalities on FEES, with one third of infants reported to have aspiration and anatomical abnormalities. Changes in feeding practices were recommended to majority of the infants based on FEES evaluation. Four of the five infants with anatomical abnormalities referred urgently for specialist evaluation required interventions.