{"title":"Phylogeny and Polyploidy Evolution of the Suckers (Teleostei: Catostomidae).","authors":"Lei Yang, Richard L Mayden, Gavin J P Naylor","doi":"10.3390/biology13121072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fishes in the cypriniform family Catostomidae (suckers) are evolutionary tetraploids. The use of nuclear markers in the phylogenetic study of this important group has been greatly hindered by the challenge of identifying paralogous copies of genes. In the present study, we used two different methods to separate the gene copies of five single-copy nuclear genes (i.e., RAG1, EGR2B, EGR3, IRBP2, and RAG2). For each gene, all sequences of Copy I formed a clade that was sister to the clade formed by all sequences of Copy II in the phylogenetic trees. The maternal and paternal progenitor of the tetraploid ancestor of the Catostomidae could not be determined. We also constructed a mitochondrial tree to reflect the maternal relationships among major catostomid lineages. Our data appear to support a sister relationship between Catostominae and a monophyletic group composed of Myxocyprininae, Cycleptinae, and Ictiobinae. However, within Catostominae, there is significant conflict between mitochondrial and nuclear data regarding the relationships among Erimyzonini, Catostomini, and Moxostomatini/Thoburnini. Many indels, unexpected stop codons, and possible gene loss were identified in one gene copy of RAG1, RAG2, and IRBP2. We believe that additional nuclear genome data are needed to better resolve the phylogenetic relationships within the family Catostomidae.</p>","PeriodicalId":48624,"journal":{"name":"Biology-Basel","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13121072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fishes in the cypriniform family Catostomidae (suckers) are evolutionary tetraploids. The use of nuclear markers in the phylogenetic study of this important group has been greatly hindered by the challenge of identifying paralogous copies of genes. In the present study, we used two different methods to separate the gene copies of five single-copy nuclear genes (i.e., RAG1, EGR2B, EGR3, IRBP2, and RAG2). For each gene, all sequences of Copy I formed a clade that was sister to the clade formed by all sequences of Copy II in the phylogenetic trees. The maternal and paternal progenitor of the tetraploid ancestor of the Catostomidae could not be determined. We also constructed a mitochondrial tree to reflect the maternal relationships among major catostomid lineages. Our data appear to support a sister relationship between Catostominae and a monophyletic group composed of Myxocyprininae, Cycleptinae, and Ictiobinae. However, within Catostominae, there is significant conflict between mitochondrial and nuclear data regarding the relationships among Erimyzonini, Catostomini, and Moxostomatini/Thoburnini. Many indels, unexpected stop codons, and possible gene loss were identified in one gene copy of RAG1, RAG2, and IRBP2. We believe that additional nuclear genome data are needed to better resolve the phylogenetic relationships within the family Catostomidae.
期刊介绍:
Biology (ISSN 2079-7737) is an international, peer-reviewed, quick-refereeing open access journal of Biological Science published by MDPI online. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications in all areas of biology and at the interface of related disciplines. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files regarding the full details of the experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.