Turkish validity and reliability of Burnout Syndrome Assessment Scale for nurses working in intensive care units.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Yağmur Dağ, Gülsün Özdemir Aydın, Nuray Turan
{"title":"Turkish validity and reliability of Burnout Syndrome Assessment Scale for nurses working in intensive care units.","authors":"Yağmur Dağ, Gülsün Özdemir Aydın, Nuray Turan","doi":"10.1186/s12912-024-02650-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to translate the Burnout Syndrome Assessment Scale (BOSAS) for Nurses Working in Intensive Care Units into Turkish validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The questionnaire was planned to be of a methodological type and translation-back translation methods were used to translate it into Turkish. The content validity was established by submitting it to a panel of 12 faculty members with expertise in nursing. The Burnout Syndrome Assessment Scale (BOSAS) for Nurses Working in Intensive Care Units, the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), and the Nurse Information Form were applied to 200 nurses. Internal consistency analyses were conducted using Cronbach's alpha coefficients and item analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis was employed to evaluate the construct validity. To ascertain the scale's stability over time, a test-retest method was implemented, involving the administration of a questionnaire to 150 intensive care nurses at two-week intervals. The MBI facilitated the assessment of the level of agreement between parallel forms, and intraclass correlations were computed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following confirming language equivalence for the scale, the content validity index was subsequently computed. The items' content validity indices (CVIs) ranged between 0.833 and 1.000 and were higher than the generally accepted standard level. Nevertheless, since most of the items related to the scale were explained over a single dimension, the factor analysis application was carried out over a single dimension. The MBI was used to assess the interreliability of the Burnout Syndrome Assessment (BOSAS) Scale for Nurses Working in Intensive Care Units in parallel forms. The scale's internal consistency coefficient demonstrated a high-reliability level, achieving a value of 0.95. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) obtained for each subdimension and overall questionnaire were high.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Turkish adaptation of this scale is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating and identifying burnout among nurses in intensive care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02650-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to translate the Burnout Syndrome Assessment Scale (BOSAS) for Nurses Working in Intensive Care Units into Turkish validity and reliability.

Methods: The questionnaire was planned to be of a methodological type and translation-back translation methods were used to translate it into Turkish. The content validity was established by submitting it to a panel of 12 faculty members with expertise in nursing. The Burnout Syndrome Assessment Scale (BOSAS) for Nurses Working in Intensive Care Units, the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), and the Nurse Information Form were applied to 200 nurses. Internal consistency analyses were conducted using Cronbach's alpha coefficients and item analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis was employed to evaluate the construct validity. To ascertain the scale's stability over time, a test-retest method was implemented, involving the administration of a questionnaire to 150 intensive care nurses at two-week intervals. The MBI facilitated the assessment of the level of agreement between parallel forms, and intraclass correlations were computed.

Results: Following confirming language equivalence for the scale, the content validity index was subsequently computed. The items' content validity indices (CVIs) ranged between 0.833 and 1.000 and were higher than the generally accepted standard level. Nevertheless, since most of the items related to the scale were explained over a single dimension, the factor analysis application was carried out over a single dimension. The MBI was used to assess the interreliability of the Burnout Syndrome Assessment (BOSAS) Scale for Nurses Working in Intensive Care Units in parallel forms. The scale's internal consistency coefficient demonstrated a high-reliability level, achieving a value of 0.95. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) obtained for each subdimension and overall questionnaire were high.

Conclusion: The Turkish adaptation of this scale is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating and identifying burnout among nurses in intensive care settings.

重症监护室护士职业倦怠综合征量表的土耳其语效度和信度。
目的:本研究旨在将重症监护室护士职业倦怠综合征评估量表(BOSAS)翻译成土耳其语的效度和信度。方法:问卷设计为方法学型,采用反译法将问卷翻译成土耳其语。内容效度是通过将其提交给12名具有护理专业知识的教师组成的小组来确定的。采用重症监护室护士职业倦怠综合征评估量表(BOSAS)、Maslach职业倦怠量表(MBI)和护士信息表对200名护士进行调查。采用Cronbach’s alpha系数和项目分析进行内部一致性分析。采用验证性因子分析评估构念效度。为了确定量表随时间的稳定性,实施了一种测试-重测试方法,包括每隔两周对150名重症监护护士进行问卷调查。MBI有助于评估平行形式之间的一致程度,并计算类内相关性。结果:在确认量表的语言等效性后,随后计算内容效度指数。项目的内容效度指数(CVIs)在0.833 ~ 1.000之间,均高于通用标准水平。然而,由于与量表有关的大多数项目都是在单一维度上解释的,因此因素分析应用程序是在单一维度上进行的。采用MBI量表对重症监护室护士职业倦怠综合征评估量表(BOSAS)的互信度进行平行评估。量表的内部一致性系数具有较高的信度水平,达到0.95。各子维度与总体问卷的类内相关系数(ICCs)均较高。结论:土耳其人对该量表的适应是评估和识别重症监护护士职业倦怠的有效和可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信