The impact of COVID-19 public health and social measures on years of potential life lost.

Q3 Medicine
Ryan Saullo, Jansen Jones, Matthew S Thiese, Chapman Cox, Uchenna C Ogbonnaya, Kurt T Hegmann
{"title":"The impact of COVID-19 public health and social measures on years of potential life lost.","authors":"Ryan Saullo, Jansen Jones, Matthew S Thiese, Chapman Cox, Uchenna C Ogbonnaya, Kurt T Hegmann","doi":"10.5055/jem.0843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To determine the impacts of statewide coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related public health and social measures (PHSMs) and attempted pandemic mitigation measures on years of potential life lost (YPLL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The \"openness score\" of each state during the COVID-19 pandemic was obtained using two open-source sites, the Multistate openness score and the Wallethub openness score. These scores combined various PHSMs, such as restrictions on gatherings and closing various types of businesses. Using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Wonder database, the differences in prepandemic (2017-2019) and pandemic excess mortality were calculated in terms of YPLL and then compared to the openness scores using univariate regression modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>States that instituted more restrictive PHSMs as measured by openness scores failed to experience reductions in YPLL. On the contrary, there were trends toward statistical significance associating greater YPLL with the institution of more stringent PHSMs (p = 0.109 and p = 0.080 for Multistate and Wallethub, respectively).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study suggests restrictive PHSMs were ineffective for improving mortality in this pandemic and trended toward increasing mortality in the younger population, presumably from other, non-COVID-19 causes.</p>","PeriodicalId":38336,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Management","volume":"22 6","pages":"639-648"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To determine the impacts of statewide coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related public health and social measures (PHSMs) and attempted pandemic mitigation measures on years of potential life lost (YPLL).

Methods: The "openness score" of each state during the COVID-19 pandemic was obtained using two open-source sites, the Multistate openness score and the Wallethub openness score. These scores combined various PHSMs, such as restrictions on gatherings and closing various types of businesses. Using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Wonder database, the differences in prepandemic (2017-2019) and pandemic excess mortality were calculated in terms of YPLL and then compared to the openness scores using univariate regression modeling.

Results: States that instituted more restrictive PHSMs as measured by openness scores failed to experience reductions in YPLL. On the contrary, there were trends toward statistical significance associating greater YPLL with the institution of more stringent PHSMs (p = 0.109 and p = 0.080 for Multistate and Wallethub, respectively).

Discussion: This study suggests restrictive PHSMs were ineffective for improving mortality in this pandemic and trended toward increasing mortality in the younger population, presumably from other, non-COVID-19 causes.

COVID-19公共卫生和社会措施对潜在生命损失年数的影响。
背景:确定与2019年全州冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关的公共卫生和社会措施(PHSMs)和尝试的大流行缓解措施对潜在生命损失年数(YPLL)的影响。方法:采用Multistate开放度评分和Wallethub开放度评分两个开源网站获取疫情期间各州的“开放度评分”。这些分数综合了各种phsm,例如限制集会和关闭各种类型的企业。利用美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC) Wonder数据库的数据,以YPLL计算大流行前(2017-2019)和大流行超额死亡率的差异,然后使用单变量回归模型将其与开放性评分进行比较。结果:通过开放性评分来衡量,那些建立了更多限制性phsm的州未能经历YPLL的减少。相反,更高的YPLL与更严格的phsm制度之间存在统计学意义的趋势(Multistate和Wallethub分别为p = 0.109和p = 0.080)。讨论:本研究表明,限制性phsm对提高本次大流行的死亡率无效,并且有增加年轻人群死亡率的趋势,可能是其他非covid -19原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Management
Journal of Emergency Management Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信