Preventative self-regulatory primary care leadership in urban China: impact on physician well-being and medical service quality.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Mengyuan Xu, Ruixue Zhao, Mengyao Li, Stephen Nicholas, Elizabeth Maitland, Jinnan Zhang, Huan Jia, Jing Wang, Wenhua Wang
{"title":"Preventative self-regulatory primary care leadership in urban China: impact on physician well-being and medical service quality.","authors":"Mengyuan Xu, Ruixue Zhao, Mengyao Li, Stephen Nicholas, Elizabeth Maitland, Jinnan Zhang, Huan Jia, Jing Wang, Wenhua Wang","doi":"10.1108/JHOM-03-2024-0104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aims to address the gap between leaders' preventative self-regulatory focus and its impact on Chinese primary care physicians (PCPs) well-being, measured by work-family spillover stress and work exhaustion and on healthcare quality, measured by preventive service delivery and clinical guideline adherence.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>This paper conducted a cross-sectional in-person survey with 38 leaders and 224 PCPs in 38 primary health centers (PHCs) in Jinan, Tianjin, Shenzhen and Shanghai. Guided by the regulatory focus theory, this paper built hierarchical linear regression models to examine the association between the leadership's regulatory focus and physician burnout, work-family conflict, clinic guideline adherence and preventive service delivery.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>This paper added the knowledge of leadership's regulatory focus impact on the well-being and medical service quality of PCPs. Prevention regulatory focus of leaders was significantly associated with work exhaustion and physicians' reported work-family conflict. There is no significant association between leadership's prevention regulatory focus and PCPs' preventive service delivery or clinical guideline adherence.</p><p><strong>Research limitations/implications: </strong>Data on the regulatory focus of PCPs were not collected. Future studies should collect longitudinal data, allowing for exploration of the mechanism.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>This paper revealed that PHC leaders should restructure their leadership focus away from preventive regulatory behavior, promoting a team atmosphere and enhancing PCP attitudes, behaviors and well-being.</p><p><strong>Social implications: </strong>To improve the well-being of PCPs and the quality of medical services, our results recommend a focus on establishing a positive organizational culture and addressing the emotional and professional needs of PCPs. To achieve these aims, policymakers should implement measures that promote a more comprehensive and balanced regulatory focus within PHC institutions. These measures should aim to create an environment that supports physician well-being and enhances the quality of healthcare services. Providing ample resources and support, promoting a collaborative team atmosphere and encouraging open communication are vital to empowering PCPs.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>This study examined the preventive regulatory focus of PHC leaders on the well-being and medical service quality of PCPs in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":47447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","volume":" ","pages":"447-458"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-03-2024-0104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The study aims to address the gap between leaders' preventative self-regulatory focus and its impact on Chinese primary care physicians (PCPs) well-being, measured by work-family spillover stress and work exhaustion and on healthcare quality, measured by preventive service delivery and clinical guideline adherence.

Design/methodology/approach: This paper conducted a cross-sectional in-person survey with 38 leaders and 224 PCPs in 38 primary health centers (PHCs) in Jinan, Tianjin, Shenzhen and Shanghai. Guided by the regulatory focus theory, this paper built hierarchical linear regression models to examine the association between the leadership's regulatory focus and physician burnout, work-family conflict, clinic guideline adherence and preventive service delivery.

Findings: This paper added the knowledge of leadership's regulatory focus impact on the well-being and medical service quality of PCPs. Prevention regulatory focus of leaders was significantly associated with work exhaustion and physicians' reported work-family conflict. There is no significant association between leadership's prevention regulatory focus and PCPs' preventive service delivery or clinical guideline adherence.

Research limitations/implications: Data on the regulatory focus of PCPs were not collected. Future studies should collect longitudinal data, allowing for exploration of the mechanism.

Practical implications: This paper revealed that PHC leaders should restructure their leadership focus away from preventive regulatory behavior, promoting a team atmosphere and enhancing PCP attitudes, behaviors and well-being.

Social implications: To improve the well-being of PCPs and the quality of medical services, our results recommend a focus on establishing a positive organizational culture and addressing the emotional and professional needs of PCPs. To achieve these aims, policymakers should implement measures that promote a more comprehensive and balanced regulatory focus within PHC institutions. These measures should aim to create an environment that supports physician well-being and enhances the quality of healthcare services. Providing ample resources and support, promoting a collaborative team atmosphere and encouraging open communication are vital to empowering PCPs.

Originality/value: This study examined the preventive regulatory focus of PHC leaders on the well-being and medical service quality of PCPs in China.

中国城市预防性自我调节初级保健领导:对医生幸福感和医疗服务质量的影响
目的:本研究旨在探讨领导的预防性自我调节焦点及其对初级保健医生(pcp)幸福感(以工作-家庭溢出压力和工作疲劳衡量)和医疗保健质量(以预防性服务提供和临床指南遵守衡量)的影响之间的差距。设计/方法/方法:本文对济南、天津、深圳和上海的38个初级卫生中心(PHCs)的38名领导和224名pcp进行了横断面面对面调查。本文以监管焦点理论为指导,构建层次线性回归模型,考察了领导监管焦点与医生职业倦怠、工作家庭冲突、临床指南依从性和预防服务提供之间的关系。结果:本研究增加了领导监管焦点对基层医疗服务人员幸福感和医疗服务质量的影响。领导的预防监管重点与工作疲劳和医生报告的工作-家庭冲突显著相关。领导的预防监管重点与pcp的预防服务提供或临床指南依从性之间没有显着关联。研究局限性/启示:未收集pcp监管重点的数据。未来的研究应收集纵向数据,以便探索其机制。实践启示:PHC领导者应调整其领导重心,从预防性监管行为转向营造团队氛围,提升PCP态度、行为和幸福感。社会意义:为了改善私人诊所的福利和医疗服务质量,我们的研究结果建议建立一个积极的组织文化,并解决私人诊所的情感和专业需求。为了实现这些目标,决策者应该实施措施,促进初级保健机构内部更加全面和平衡的监管重点。这些措施的目的应是创造一种环境,支持医生的福祉和提高医疗保健服务的质量。提供充足的资源和支援、促进合作的团队氛围,以及鼓励开放的沟通,是加强专业合作伙伴关系的关键。原创性/价值:本研究考察了中国初级保健医院领导对初级保健医生福利和医疗服务质量的预防性监管重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: ■International health and international organizations ■Organisational behaviour, governance, management and leadership ■The inter-relationship of health and public sector services ■Theories and practices of management and leadership in health and related organizations ■Emotion in health care organizations ■Management education and training ■Industrial relations and human resource theory and management. As the demands on the health care industry both polarize and intensify, effective management of financial and human resources, the restructuring of organizations and the handling of market forces are increasingly important areas for the industry to address.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信