Predictive accuracy of comorbidity index models in assessing mortality risk among hemodialysis patients: A comprehensive single-center observational cohort study.

IF 2.2 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Aging Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-24 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1002/agm2.12384
Yanna Yu, Fen Li, Zhan Wang, Zhibin Ni, Shu Zhang, Weihong Zhao, Xiaohua Pei
{"title":"Predictive accuracy of comorbidity index models in assessing mortality risk among hemodialysis patients: A comprehensive single-center observational cohort study.","authors":"Yanna Yu, Fen Li, Zhan Wang, Zhibin Ni, Shu Zhang, Weihong Zhao, Xiaohua Pei","doi":"10.1002/agm2.12384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Comorbidity prediction models have been demonstrated to offer more comprehensive and accurate predictions of death risk compared to single indices. However, their application in China has been limited, particularly among maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of comorbidity index models in predicting mortality risk among Chinese MHD patients.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The MHD patients in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine were taken as the subjects. Claims-based disease-specific refinements matching translation to ICD-10 and flexibility (CDMF-CCI) model and Liu model were selected as the candidate models for this verification research. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression calculations were used to analyze the independent predictive effect of the models on survival rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Annually, nearly 500 patients undergo hemodialysis treatment. From January 2019 to June 2022, a total of 199 patients succumbed, with a mean age of 65.2 years. During these 4 years, the mortality rates were 13.04%, 9.68%, 11.69%, and 6.39%, respectively. The leading causes of death were sudden demise (82 patients, 41.2%), cardiovascular disease (48 patients, 24.1%), pulmonary infection (33 patients, 16.5%), and stroke (19 patients, 9.5%). When compared to individual indices, the CDMF-CCI model displayed more accurate and predictive results, with an HR of 1.190 (<i>P</i> = 0.037). Conversely, the Liu model failed to identify high-risk individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MHD patients face a significant risk of mortality. When compared to univariate parameters and the Liu model, the CDMF-CCI model exhibits superior predictive accuracy for mortality in MHD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":32862,"journal":{"name":"Aging Medicine","volume":"7 6","pages":"737-743"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11702383/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agm2.12384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Comorbidity prediction models have been demonstrated to offer more comprehensive and accurate predictions of death risk compared to single indices. However, their application in China has been limited, particularly among maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of comorbidity index models in predicting mortality risk among Chinese MHD patients.

Methodology: The MHD patients in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine were taken as the subjects. Claims-based disease-specific refinements matching translation to ICD-10 and flexibility (CDMF-CCI) model and Liu model were selected as the candidate models for this verification research. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression calculations were used to analyze the independent predictive effect of the models on survival rate.

Results: Annually, nearly 500 patients undergo hemodialysis treatment. From January 2019 to June 2022, a total of 199 patients succumbed, with a mean age of 65.2 years. During these 4 years, the mortality rates were 13.04%, 9.68%, 11.69%, and 6.39%, respectively. The leading causes of death were sudden demise (82 patients, 41.2%), cardiovascular disease (48 patients, 24.1%), pulmonary infection (33 patients, 16.5%), and stroke (19 patients, 9.5%). When compared to individual indices, the CDMF-CCI model displayed more accurate and predictive results, with an HR of 1.190 (P = 0.037). Conversely, the Liu model failed to identify high-risk individuals.

Conclusion: The MHD patients face a significant risk of mortality. When compared to univariate parameters and the Liu model, the CDMF-CCI model exhibits superior predictive accuracy for mortality in MHD patients.

评估血透患者死亡风险的合并症指数模型的预测准确性:一项综合单中心观察队列研究
目的:与单一指标相比,共病预测模型已被证明可提供更全面和准确的死亡风险预测。然而,它们在中国的应用有限,特别是在维持性血液透析(MHD)患者中的应用。因此,本研究的目的是评估合并症指数模型在预测中国MHD患者死亡风险中的效用。方法:以广州中医药大学第一附属医院的MHD患者为研究对象。基于理赔的疾病特异性细化匹配翻译ICD-10和灵活性(CDMF-CCI)模型和Liu模型被选为本验证研究的候选模型。采用单因素和多因素Cox回归计算分析各模型对生存率的独立预测效果。结果:每年有近500例患者接受血液透析治疗。2019年1月至2022年6月,共有199例患者死亡,平均年龄65.2岁。4年间的死亡率分别为13.04%、9.68%、11.69%和6.39%。主要死亡原因为猝死(82例,41.2%)、心血管疾病(48例,24.1%)、肺部感染(33例,16.5%)和脑卒中(19例,9.5%)。与单项指标相比,CDMF-CCI模型显示出更准确的预测结果,HR为1.190 (P = 0.037)。相反,Liu模型未能识别出高风险个体。结论:MHD患者存在显著的死亡风险。与单变量参数和Liu模型相比,CDMF-CCI模型对MHD患者死亡率的预测准确性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aging Medicine
Aging Medicine Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信