Patterns of utilization of advanced practice providers in reproductive endocrinology: a 2023 national survey

Tamara Tobias A.R.N.P., W.H.N.P.-B.C. , Nicole Callahan M.S.N., F.N.P.-C. , Laura Augustine D.N.P., F.N.P.-C. , Barbara Tanaka M.S.N., W.H.N.P.-B.C.
{"title":"Patterns of utilization of advanced practice providers in reproductive endocrinology: a 2023 national survey","authors":"Tamara Tobias A.R.N.P., W.H.N.P.-B.C. ,&nbsp;Nicole Callahan M.S.N., F.N.P.-C. ,&nbsp;Laura Augustine D.N.P., F.N.P.-C. ,&nbsp;Barbara Tanaka M.S.N., W.H.N.P.-B.C.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfre.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the current utilization of advanced practice providers (APPs) within the field of reproductive endocrinology and infertility.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Web-based.</div></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><div>A total of 201 APPs surveyed through the American Society of Reproductive Medicine APP Professional Group.</div></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><div>Anonymized online survey.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Demographics, scope of practice and responsibilities, and training and onboarding.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Respondents were primarily Family Nurse Practitioners (26.4%), Women’s Health Nurse Practitioners (33.3%), or Physician Associates (29.8%). Two-thirds (67.4%) reported that their scope of practice is limited by their employer or practice, 43.5% by state restrictions, and 25.2% by insurance. Survey respondents reported that 44.4% of their time at work is dedicated to performing procedures and scans and 30.6% to conducting consults and follow-ups. The most commonly reported duties were physical examinations (88.6%), intrauterine inseminations (86.6%), saline sonohysterograms (79.6%), endometrial biopsies (76.6%), ultrasounds (74.6%), and problem visits such as for pain, cysts, and bleeding (73.1%). Most survey respondents (61.7%) reported having autonomy in deciding protocols and treatment options for patients in their practice. Respondents described their onboarding training as including observation/on-the-job training (94.0%), independent reading of texts and journals (66.7%), American Society of Reproductive Medicine online courses (45.3%), formal orientation (34.8%), and practice-organized training programs (29.4%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Advanced practice providers are highly trained members of the care team, but continue to be underused within the field of reproductive endocrinology and infertility. Improvements in educational resources and/or use of a formalized program to train APPs to their full scope of practice may help increase clinic efficiency and improve patient access to care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34409,"journal":{"name":"FS Reports","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 363-368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FS Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334124001107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the current utilization of advanced practice providers (APPs) within the field of reproductive endocrinology and infertility.

Design

Cross-sectional.

Setting

Web-based.

Patients

A total of 201 APPs surveyed through the American Society of Reproductive Medicine APP Professional Group.

Exposure

Anonymized online survey.

Main Outcome Measures

Demographics, scope of practice and responsibilities, and training and onboarding.

Results

Respondents were primarily Family Nurse Practitioners (26.4%), Women’s Health Nurse Practitioners (33.3%), or Physician Associates (29.8%). Two-thirds (67.4%) reported that their scope of practice is limited by their employer or practice, 43.5% by state restrictions, and 25.2% by insurance. Survey respondents reported that 44.4% of their time at work is dedicated to performing procedures and scans and 30.6% to conducting consults and follow-ups. The most commonly reported duties were physical examinations (88.6%), intrauterine inseminations (86.6%), saline sonohysterograms (79.6%), endometrial biopsies (76.6%), ultrasounds (74.6%), and problem visits such as for pain, cysts, and bleeding (73.1%). Most survey respondents (61.7%) reported having autonomy in deciding protocols and treatment options for patients in their practice. Respondents described their onboarding training as including observation/on-the-job training (94.0%), independent reading of texts and journals (66.7%), American Society of Reproductive Medicine online courses (45.3%), formal orientation (34.8%), and practice-organized training programs (29.4%).

Conclusions

Advanced practice providers are highly trained members of the care team, but continue to be underused within the field of reproductive endocrinology and infertility. Improvements in educational resources and/or use of a formalized program to train APPs to their full scope of practice may help increase clinic efficiency and improve patient access to care.
生殖内分泌科高级执业医师的使用模式:一项2023年全国调查。
目的:评价生殖内分泌与不孕症高级执业医师(APPs)的使用现状。设计:横断面。设置:基于web的。患者:通过美国生殖医学学会APP专业组共调查201个APP。曝光:匿名在线调查。主要结果度量:人口统计,实践范围和责任,以及培训和入职。结果:受访者主要是家庭护士从业人员(26.4%)、妇女保健护士从业人员(33.3%)或医师助理(29.8%)。三分之二(67.4%)的人报告说,他们的执业范围受到雇主或执业的限制,43.5%受到州的限制,25.2%受到保险的限制。受访者表示,44.4%的工作时间用于进行手术和扫描,30.6%的时间用于进行咨询和随访。最常见的报告职责是体格检查(88.6%)、宫内人工授精(86.6%)、生理盐水超声宫腔镜检查(79.6%)、子宫内膜活检(76.6%)、超声波检查(74.6%)以及因疼痛、囊肿和出血等问题就诊(73.1%)。大多数受访者(61.7%)报告说,他们在实践中自主决定患者的方案和治疗方案。受访者将他们的入职培训描述为包括观察/在职培训(94.0%)、独立阅读文本和期刊(66.7%)、美国生殖医学学会在线课程(45.3%)、正式培训(34.8%)和实践组织的培训项目(29.4%)。结论:高级实践提供者是训练有素的护理团队成员,但在生殖内分泌和不孕症领域仍未得到充分利用。改善教育资源和/或使用正式的程序来培训app充分发挥其作用,可能有助于提高诊所效率和改善患者获得护理的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FS Reports
FS Reports Medicine-Embryology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信