Is endometriosis typology a potentially better classification system for assessing risk of female infertility?

Karen C. Schliep Ph.D. , Anna Z. Pollack Ph.D. , Leslie V. Farland Sc.D. , May Shaaban M.P.H. , Bin Yan M.S.T.A.T. , Jing Wang Ph.D. , Lina Ghabayen M.D. , Rachael B. Hemmert M.S.P.H. , Joseph B. Stanford M.D. , C. Matthew Peterson M.D.
{"title":"Is endometriosis typology a potentially better classification system for assessing risk of female infertility?","authors":"Karen C. Schliep Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Anna Z. Pollack Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Leslie V. Farland Sc.D. ,&nbsp;May Shaaban M.P.H. ,&nbsp;Bin Yan M.S.T.A.T. ,&nbsp;Jing Wang Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Lina Ghabayen M.D. ,&nbsp;Rachael B. Hemmert M.S.P.H. ,&nbsp;Joseph B. Stanford M.D. ,&nbsp;C. Matthew Peterson M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfre.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine whether endometriosis typology, namely ovarian endometriomas (OE), deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), or superficial endometriosis (SE), correlates with fertility history.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>One of fourteen surgical centers in Salt Lake City, Utah (n = 5) or San Francisco, California (n = 9).</div></div><div><h3>Patient(s)</h3><div>A total of 473 women (18–44 years) with no prior endometriosis diagnosis, undergoing laparoscopies/laparotomies, irrespective of indication, in Utah or California (2007–2009).</div></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><div>Incident endometriosis.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measure(s)</h3><div>Before surgery, we queried women about time to become pregnant for prior planned pregnancies. Generalized linear models were used to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) for association between endometriosis typology and infertility, defined as having ever tried &gt;12 months (&gt;6 months for women ≥35 years) to get pregnant. We also generated fecundability odds ratios (aFOR) to capture time to pregnancy.</div></div><div><h3>Result(s)</h3><div>Twenty-five percent (n = 116) of women were diagnosed with SE only, 5% (n = 23) with OE, 6% (n = 29) with DIE, and 5% (n = 22) with OE + DIE, and 60% (n = 283) with no endometriosis. Compared with women with no endometriosis, women with SE had a 1.58 higher aPR (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16–2.14), although women with OE and/or DIE had a 2.41 higher aPR for subfertility after adjusting for women’s age, body mass index, and site. Compared with women with no endometriosis, women with OE and/or DIE had a 53% lower historic fecundability (aFOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24–0.95); however, no association was found among women with SE (aFOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.49–1.33).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion(s)</h3><div>Specific endometriosis typologies may be associated with fecundability, with OE and/or DIE associated with nearly a 150% higher prevalence of subfertility and over a 50% lower historic fecundability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34409,"journal":{"name":"FS Reports","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 394-401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FS Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334124000904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To determine whether endometriosis typology, namely ovarian endometriomas (OE), deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), or superficial endometriosis (SE), correlates with fertility history.

Design

Prospective cohort.

Setting

One of fourteen surgical centers in Salt Lake City, Utah (n = 5) or San Francisco, California (n = 9).

Patient(s)

A total of 473 women (18–44 years) with no prior endometriosis diagnosis, undergoing laparoscopies/laparotomies, irrespective of indication, in Utah or California (2007–2009).

Exposure

Incident endometriosis.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Before surgery, we queried women about time to become pregnant for prior planned pregnancies. Generalized linear models were used to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) for association between endometriosis typology and infertility, defined as having ever tried >12 months (>6 months for women ≥35 years) to get pregnant. We also generated fecundability odds ratios (aFOR) to capture time to pregnancy.

Result(s)

Twenty-five percent (n = 116) of women were diagnosed with SE only, 5% (n = 23) with OE, 6% (n = 29) with DIE, and 5% (n = 22) with OE + DIE, and 60% (n = 283) with no endometriosis. Compared with women with no endometriosis, women with SE had a 1.58 higher aPR (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16–2.14), although women with OE and/or DIE had a 2.41 higher aPR for subfertility after adjusting for women’s age, body mass index, and site. Compared with women with no endometriosis, women with OE and/or DIE had a 53% lower historic fecundability (aFOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24–0.95); however, no association was found among women with SE (aFOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.49–1.33).

Conclusion(s)

Specific endometriosis typologies may be associated with fecundability, with OE and/or DIE associated with nearly a 150% higher prevalence of subfertility and over a 50% lower historic fecundability.
子宫内膜异位症的类型是否是评估女性不孕症风险的更好的分类系统?
目的:探讨子宫内膜异位症类型,即卵巢子宫内膜异位症(OE)、深浸润性子宫内膜异位症(DIE)和浅表性子宫内膜异位症(SE)是否与生育史相关。设计:前瞻性队列。环境:犹他州盐湖城(n = 5)或加利福尼亚州旧金山(n = 9)的14个手术中心之一。患者:2007-2009年,犹他州或加利福尼亚州共473名(18-44岁)无子宫内膜异位症诊断,接受腹腔镜/开腹手术的妇女,不论适应症。暴露:偶发性子宫内膜异位症。主要结局指标:术前,我们询问了计划妊娠妇女的怀孕时间。采用广义线性模型计算子宫内膜异位症类型与不孕症之间关联的调整患病率比(aPR),定义为曾尝试怀孕100个月至12个月(≥35岁女性为100个月至6个月)。我们还生成了可生育优势比(aFOR)来捕捉到怀孕的时间。结果:25% (n = 116)的女性仅诊断为SE, 5% (n = 23)诊断为OE, 6% (n = 29)诊断为DIE, 5% (n = 22)诊断为OE + DIE, 60% (n = 283)未诊断为子宫内膜异位症。与没有子宫内膜异位症的女性相比,SE女性的aPR高1.58(95%可信区间[CI], 1.16-2.14),尽管OE和/或DIE女性在调整女性年龄、体重指数和部位后,低生育能力的aPR高2.41。与没有子宫内膜异位症的女性相比,OE和/或DIE的女性历史生育能力低53% (aFOR, 0.47;95% ci, 0.24-0.95);然而,在SE女性中没有发现相关性(aFOR, 0.81;95% ci, 0.49-1.33)。结论:特定的子宫内膜异位症类型可能与生育能力有关,OE和/或DIE与低生育能力的患病率增加了近150%,历史生育能力降低了50%以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FS Reports
FS Reports Medicine-Embryology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信