Carley N Gemelli, Surendra Karki, Perfecto Diaz, Andrew Scott, Tanya E Davison
{"title":"Pre-screening donor eligibility to avoid a deferral in the blood donation center: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Carley N Gemelli, Surendra Karki, Perfecto Diaz, Andrew Scott, Tanya E Davison","doi":"10.1111/trf.18107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The application of a temporary deferral when attempting to donate has a negative impact on retention. Little has been done to reduce the likelihood of a donor attending to donate, only to be found to be ineligible. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of pre-screening donors when making an appointment, to prevent in-center deferrals.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Donation attempts were collated between July and December 2020. Two segments were identified: (1) those who had a deferral applied and (2) those who successfully donated. Donor and donation characteristics examined included age, sex, prior donation history, deferral history, and appointment booking channel (pre-screened vs. not pre-screened). We also explored the impact of pre-screening on the subsequent donation behavior of those who were deferred.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 3.2% of donation attempts resulted in a deferral being applied. Most donors booked an appointment via a pre-screening channel (69.9%), with the mobile app being the most popular (31.9%). Donors who booked via a pre-screening channel had lower odds of receiving a deferral (aOR: 0.86). Strongest effects were observed for new donors (aOR: 0.79), those aged ≤40 years. (aOR: 0.84) and those deferred in the past (aOR: 0.87). Deferred donors who booked by a pre-screening channel were more likely to return at 6 months (aHR: 1.09) and 12 months (aHR: 1.12) compared to those who did not book through a pre-screening channel.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Pre-screening donors is a simple and effective approach to reduce the number of donors deferred when presenting to donate in the donation center, with a longer-term impact on donor retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The application of a temporary deferral when attempting to donate has a negative impact on retention. Little has been done to reduce the likelihood of a donor attending to donate, only to be found to be ineligible. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of pre-screening donors when making an appointment, to prevent in-center deferrals.
Study design and methods: Donation attempts were collated between July and December 2020. Two segments were identified: (1) those who had a deferral applied and (2) those who successfully donated. Donor and donation characteristics examined included age, sex, prior donation history, deferral history, and appointment booking channel (pre-screened vs. not pre-screened). We also explored the impact of pre-screening on the subsequent donation behavior of those who were deferred.
Results: Overall, 3.2% of donation attempts resulted in a deferral being applied. Most donors booked an appointment via a pre-screening channel (69.9%), with the mobile app being the most popular (31.9%). Donors who booked via a pre-screening channel had lower odds of receiving a deferral (aOR: 0.86). Strongest effects were observed for new donors (aOR: 0.79), those aged ≤40 years. (aOR: 0.84) and those deferred in the past (aOR: 0.87). Deferred donors who booked by a pre-screening channel were more likely to return at 6 months (aHR: 1.09) and 12 months (aHR: 1.12) compared to those who did not book through a pre-screening channel.
Discussion: Pre-screening donors is a simple and effective approach to reduce the number of donors deferred when presenting to donate in the donation center, with a longer-term impact on donor retention.
期刊介绍:
TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.