Efficacy of robot-assisted double-flap techniques with refinements to minimize anastomosis-related complications after proximal gastrectomy.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Eiichiro Nakao, Masataka Igeta, Motoki Murakami, Shugo Kohno, Yudai Hojo, Tatsuro Nakamura, Yasunori Kurahashi, Yoshinori Ishida, Hisashi Shinohara
{"title":"Efficacy of robot-assisted double-flap techniques with refinements to minimize anastomosis-related complications after proximal gastrectomy.","authors":"Eiichiro Nakao, Masataka Igeta, Motoki Murakami, Shugo Kohno, Yudai Hojo, Tatsuro Nakamura, Yasunori Kurahashi, Yoshinori Ishida, Hisashi Shinohara","doi":"10.1007/s00595-024-02989-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The double-flap technique (DFT) is an anti-reflux reconstruction procedure performed after proximal gastrectomy (PG), but its complexity and high incidence of anastomotic stenosis are problematic. We conducted this study to demonstrate the efficacy of robot-assisted DFT, with refinements, to address these issues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surgical outcomes were compared between the following procedures modified over time at our institution: conventional open DFT (group O, n = 16); early robotic DFT (group RE, n = 19), which follows the conventional open PG approach; and late robotic DFT (group RL, n = 21), which incorporates refinements to the early robotic DFT technique by exploiting more of the robotic capabilities available. These robotic capabilities include pre-anchoring the stomach to the diaphragmatic crus and connecting it to the esophagus, placing interrupted sutures for anastomosis, and maximally embedding the esophagus through the entire flap.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anastomotic stenosis requiring balloon dilatation developed in two (11.8%) patients from group O and three (14.3%) from group RE, but not in any patients from group RL. Reflux esophagitis, classified as Los Angeles Classification grade ≥ B, decreased from 25.0% in group O to 10.5% in group RE and was completely controlled in group RL (group RL vs group O, odds ratio 0.065, 95% confidence interval < 0.001-0.684, P = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic surgery helps minimize anastomotic stenosis, while enhancing the benefits of anti-reflux reconstruction with DFT.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02989-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The double-flap technique (DFT) is an anti-reflux reconstruction procedure performed after proximal gastrectomy (PG), but its complexity and high incidence of anastomotic stenosis are problematic. We conducted this study to demonstrate the efficacy of robot-assisted DFT, with refinements, to address these issues.

Methods: Surgical outcomes were compared between the following procedures modified over time at our institution: conventional open DFT (group O, n = 16); early robotic DFT (group RE, n = 19), which follows the conventional open PG approach; and late robotic DFT (group RL, n = 21), which incorporates refinements to the early robotic DFT technique by exploiting more of the robotic capabilities available. These robotic capabilities include pre-anchoring the stomach to the diaphragmatic crus and connecting it to the esophagus, placing interrupted sutures for anastomosis, and maximally embedding the esophagus through the entire flap.

Results: Anastomotic stenosis requiring balloon dilatation developed in two (11.8%) patients from group O and three (14.3%) from group RE, but not in any patients from group RL. Reflux esophagitis, classified as Los Angeles Classification grade ≥ B, decreased from 25.0% in group O to 10.5% in group RE and was completely controlled in group RL (group RL vs group O, odds ratio 0.065, 95% confidence interval < 0.001-0.684, P = 0.007).

Conclusion: Robotic surgery helps minimize anastomotic stenosis, while enhancing the benefits of anti-reflux reconstruction with DFT.

改进机器人辅助双瓣技术以减少近端胃切除术后吻合相关并发症的疗效。
目的:双瓣技术(DFT)是胃近端切除术(PG)后的一种抗反流重建手术,但其复杂性和高发生率的吻合口狭窄是一个问题。我们进行了这项研究,以证明机器人辅助DFT的有效性,并进行了改进,以解决这些问题。方法:比较我院随时间改变的以下手术方法的手术结果:常规开放式DFT (O组,n = 16);早期机器人DFT (RE组,n = 19),采用传统的开放式PG方法;以及后期机器人DFT (RL组,n = 21),通过利用更多可用的机器人功能,将早期机器人DFT技术进行了改进。这些机器人的功能包括将胃预先固定在膈小腿上并将其连接到食道,放置间断缝合线进行吻合,并最大限度地通过整个皮瓣嵌入食道。结果:O组2例(11.8%)和RE组3例(14.3%)出现吻合口狭窄,需要球囊扩张,而RL组无一例。反流性食管炎,洛杉矶分级≥B,从O组的25.0%下降到RE组的10.5%,RL组完全控制(RL组与O组,优势比0.065,95%可信区间)结论:机器人手术有助于减少吻合口狭窄,同时增强DFT抗反流重建的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgery Today
Surgery Today 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
208
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it"). The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信