Development and Validation of a Brief Age-Normed Screening Tool for Subthreshold Psychosis Symptoms in Youth.

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Monica E Calkins, Arielle Ered, Tyler M Moore, Lauren K White, Jerome Taylor, Alexander B Moxam, Kosha Ruparel, Daniel H Wolf, Theodore D Satterthwaite, Christian G Kohler, Ruben C Gur, Raquel E Gur
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Brief Age-Normed Screening Tool for Subthreshold Psychosis Symptoms in Youth.","authors":"Monica E Calkins, Arielle Ered, Tyler M Moore, Lauren K White, Jerome Taylor, Alexander B Moxam, Kosha Ruparel, Daniel H Wolf, Theodore D Satterthwaite, Christian G Kohler, Ruben C Gur, Raquel E Gur","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbae224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>Improvements in screening tools for early subthreshold psychosis symptoms are needed to facilitate early identification and intervention efforts, especially given the challenges of rapidly differentiating age-appropriate experiences from potential early signs of emerging psychosis. Tools can be lengthy and time-consuming, impacting their utility and accessibility across clinical settings, and age-normed data are limited. To address this gap, we sought to develop and validate a brief, empirically derived, age-normed, subthreshold psychosis screening tool, for public use.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Computerized adaptive test simulation was used to derive a 5-item short form with age norm equivalencies from a 12-item PRIME-Screen-Revised (PRIME-12) administered to 7053 youth (Mage = 15.8, SD = 2.7; 54% female; 33% Black). Concurrent validity was assessed (n = 758) using contemporaneous administration of the PRIME-5 and the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes. Comparability of criterion-related validity of the PRIME-5, PRIME-12, and Scale of Prodromal Symptoms (SOPS) was assessed by relating scores to psychosis-risk-relevant criteria. Finally, self-report versus assessor-administered PRIME total scores were compared (n = 131) to assess their concurrent validity.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>Correlations among PRIME-5, PRIME-12, and SOPS were comparable and moderate, supporting their convergent validity. The PRIME-5 also showed comparable criterion-related validity, demonstrating similar relationships with psychosis-risk indicators as the other tools. Self-reported and assessor-administered PRIME-5 were moderately correlated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Public availability of a brief, age-normed, and validated screening tool-which can be assessor or self-administered-will expedite and improve early identification of youth (age 11 and older) at risk for psychosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"1242-1253"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12414555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbae224","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and hypothesis: Improvements in screening tools for early subthreshold psychosis symptoms are needed to facilitate early identification and intervention efforts, especially given the challenges of rapidly differentiating age-appropriate experiences from potential early signs of emerging psychosis. Tools can be lengthy and time-consuming, impacting their utility and accessibility across clinical settings, and age-normed data are limited. To address this gap, we sought to develop and validate a brief, empirically derived, age-normed, subthreshold psychosis screening tool, for public use.

Study design: Computerized adaptive test simulation was used to derive a 5-item short form with age norm equivalencies from a 12-item PRIME-Screen-Revised (PRIME-12) administered to 7053 youth (Mage = 15.8, SD = 2.7; 54% female; 33% Black). Concurrent validity was assessed (n = 758) using contemporaneous administration of the PRIME-5 and the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes. Comparability of criterion-related validity of the PRIME-5, PRIME-12, and Scale of Prodromal Symptoms (SOPS) was assessed by relating scores to psychosis-risk-relevant criteria. Finally, self-report versus assessor-administered PRIME total scores were compared (n = 131) to assess their concurrent validity.

Study results: Correlations among PRIME-5, PRIME-12, and SOPS were comparable and moderate, supporting their convergent validity. The PRIME-5 also showed comparable criterion-related validity, demonstrating similar relationships with psychosis-risk indicators as the other tools. Self-reported and assessor-administered PRIME-5 were moderately correlated.

Conclusions: Public availability of a brief, age-normed, and validated screening tool-which can be assessor or self-administered-will expedite and improve early identification of youth (age 11 and older) at risk for psychosis.

一种针对青少年阈下精神病症状的简单年龄筛选工具的开发和验证。
背景和假设:需要改进早期阈下精神病症状的筛查工具,以促进早期识别和干预工作,特别是考虑到快速区分与年龄相适应的经历与潜在的早期新发精神病症状的挑战。工具可能冗长且耗时,影响其在临床环境中的效用和可访问性,并且年龄规范数据有限。为了解决这一差距,我们试图开发和验证一个简短的、经验推导的、年龄规范的、阈下精神病筛查工具,供公众使用。研究设计:采用计算机化自适应测试模拟,从7053名青年(Mage = 15.8, SD = 2.7;54%的女性;33%的黑人)。同时进行效度评估(n = 758),同时使用PRIME-5和前驱综合征结构化访谈。通过与精神病风险相关标准的相关得分来评估PRIME-5、PRIME-12和前驱症状量表(SOPS)的标准相关效度的可比性。最后,比较自我报告和评估员管理的PRIME总分(n = 131)以评估其并发效度。研究结果:PRIME-5、PRIME-12和SOPS之间的相关性具有可比性和中等程度,支持其收敛效度。PRIME-5也显示出可比较的标准相关效度,与其他工具显示出类似的精神病风险指标关系。自我报告与评估者管理的PRIME-5有中度相关。结论:一种简短的、年龄规范的、经过验证的筛查工具的公开可用性——可以评估或自我管理——将加快和改善对青少年(11岁及以上)精神病风险的早期识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Schizophrenia Bulletin 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Schizophrenia Bulletin seeks to review recent developments and empirically based hypotheses regarding the etiology and treatment of schizophrenia. We view the field as broad and deep, and will publish new knowledge ranging from the molecular basis to social and cultural factors. We will give new emphasis to translational reports which simultaneously highlight basic neurobiological mechanisms and clinical manifestations. Some of the Bulletin content is invited as special features or manuscripts organized as a theme by special guest editors. Most pages of the Bulletin are devoted to unsolicited manuscripts of high quality that report original data or where we can provide a special venue for a major study or workshop report. Supplement issues are sometimes provided for manuscripts reporting from a recent conference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信