US-Guided Thermal Ablation for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Radiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1148/radiol.233104
Yang Liu, Cheng-Zhong Peng, Hui-Hui Chai, Lin-Xue Qian, Song-Song Wu, Ming-An Yu, Shui-Ping Li, Jian-Tang Zhang, Yue Shan, Fang-Yi Liu, Chong-Bing Sun, Zhi-Wei Yang, Rui Zhang, Ying Che, Shu-Hang Gao, Jie Yu, Ping Liang
{"title":"US-Guided Thermal Ablation for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism: A Prospective Multicenter Study.","authors":"Yang Liu, Cheng-Zhong Peng, Hui-Hui Chai, Lin-Xue Qian, Song-Song Wu, Ming-An Yu, Shui-Ping Li, Jian-Tang Zhang, Yue Shan, Fang-Yi Liu, Chong-Bing Sun, Zhi-Wei Yang, Rui Zhang, Ying Che, Shu-Hang Gao, Jie Yu, Ping Liang","doi":"10.1148/radiol.233104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Interest in microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) use for treating secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is rising; however, ablation outcomes in patients with SHPT are not well characterized. Purpose To assess the response of parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium, phosphorus, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels to US-guided parathyroid MWA and RFA and the safety of these treatments in participants with SHPT. Materials and Methods This prospective multicenter cohort study, conducted from September 2017 to March 2022, included participants with SHPT. The primary end point was the proportion of participants achieving the target PTH level (≤585 pg/mL). The secondary end points included PTH, calcium, phosphorus, and ALP levels before ablation and time points for follow-up assessments after ablation (2 hours, 1 day, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months, and then every 6 months) and complications and technical success rates. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with treatment failure. Results A total of 215 participants (median age, 53 years [IQR, 43-60 years]; 109 [50.7%] male participants) were evaluated, and 183 (85.1%) achieved target PTH levels. Compared with baseline levels, there was an 85.9%, 6.3%, 15.3%, and 37.4% reduction in PTH, calcium, phosphorus, and ALP levels at 24 months after ablation, respectively. For major complications, one (0.5%) participant experienced persistent hoarseness, and severe hypocalcemia (<1.87 mmol/L) was present in 74 (34.4%) participants. After adjustments, predictors associated with treatment failure included the preablation PTH level (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 3.78; 95% CI: 1.19, 12.04; <i>P</i> = .03), maximum tumor volume (adjusted OR, 5.02; 95% CI: 1.74, 14.53; <i>P</i> = .003), and number of glands ablated (adjusted OR, 0.32; 95% CI: 0.11, 0.98; <i>P</i> = .046). The prediction model showed good discrimination ability in the development and validation cohorts (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.78 [95% CI: 0.66, 0.90] and 0.73 [95% CI: 0.55, 0.91], respectively). Conclusion US-guided thermal ablation techniques were effective and safe treatments in participants with SHPT because they effectively reduced PTH, calcium, phosphorus, and ALP levels. © RSNA, 2025 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Gemmete in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"314 1","pages":"e233104"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.233104","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Interest in microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) use for treating secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is rising; however, ablation outcomes in patients with SHPT are not well characterized. Purpose To assess the response of parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium, phosphorus, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels to US-guided parathyroid MWA and RFA and the safety of these treatments in participants with SHPT. Materials and Methods This prospective multicenter cohort study, conducted from September 2017 to March 2022, included participants with SHPT. The primary end point was the proportion of participants achieving the target PTH level (≤585 pg/mL). The secondary end points included PTH, calcium, phosphorus, and ALP levels before ablation and time points for follow-up assessments after ablation (2 hours, 1 day, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months, and then every 6 months) and complications and technical success rates. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with treatment failure. Results A total of 215 participants (median age, 53 years [IQR, 43-60 years]; 109 [50.7%] male participants) were evaluated, and 183 (85.1%) achieved target PTH levels. Compared with baseline levels, there was an 85.9%, 6.3%, 15.3%, and 37.4% reduction in PTH, calcium, phosphorus, and ALP levels at 24 months after ablation, respectively. For major complications, one (0.5%) participant experienced persistent hoarseness, and severe hypocalcemia (<1.87 mmol/L) was present in 74 (34.4%) participants. After adjustments, predictors associated with treatment failure included the preablation PTH level (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 3.78; 95% CI: 1.19, 12.04; P = .03), maximum tumor volume (adjusted OR, 5.02; 95% CI: 1.74, 14.53; P = .003), and number of glands ablated (adjusted OR, 0.32; 95% CI: 0.11, 0.98; P = .046). The prediction model showed good discrimination ability in the development and validation cohorts (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.78 [95% CI: 0.66, 0.90] and 0.73 [95% CI: 0.55, 0.91], respectively). Conclusion US-guided thermal ablation techniques were effective and safe treatments in participants with SHPT because they effectively reduced PTH, calcium, phosphorus, and ALP levels. © RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Gemmete in this issue.

美国引导热消融治疗继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
背景微波消融(MWA)和射频消融(RFA)用于治疗继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进(SHPT)的兴趣正在上升;然而,SHPT患者的消融结果尚不明确。目的评估SHPT患者甲状旁腺激素(PTH)、钙、磷和碱性磷酸酶(ALP)水平对us引导的甲状旁腺MWA和RFA的反应以及这些治疗的安全性。材料和方法本前瞻性多中心队列研究于2017年9月至2022年3月进行,纳入了SHPT患者。主要终点是达到目标PTH水平(≤585 pg/mL)的参与者比例。次要终点包括消融前PTH、钙、磷和ALP水平以及消融后随访评估的时间点(2小时、1天、1个月、3个月和6个月,然后每6个月一次)、并发症和技术成功率。使用混合效应逻辑回归模型来确定与治疗失败相关的因素。结果共有215名受试者(中位年龄53岁[IQR, 43-60岁];109例(50.7%)男性参与者被评估,183例(85.1%)达到PTH目标水平。与基线水平相比,消融后24个月PTH、钙、磷和ALP水平分别降低了85.9%、6.3%、15.3%和37.4%。对于主要并发症,一名(0.5%)参与者经历了持续的声音沙哑,严重的低钙血症(P = 0.03),最大肿瘤体积(调整OR, 5.02;95% ci: 1.74, 14.53;P = 0.003),切除腺体数量(校正OR为0.32;95% ci: 0.11, 0.98;P = .046)。预测模型在开发和验证队列中表现出良好的判别能力(受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.78 [95% CI: 0.66, 0.90]和0.73 [95% CI: 0.55, 0.91])。结论:导引热消融技术对SHPT患者是有效且安全的治疗方法,因为它能有效降低PTH、钙、磷和ALP水平。©RSNA, 2025本文可获得补充材料。请参阅本期Gemmete的社论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiology
Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
35.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
596
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: Published regularly since 1923 by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), Radiology has long been recognized as the authoritative reference for the most current, clinically relevant and highest quality research in the field of radiology. Each month the journal publishes approximately 240 pages of peer-reviewed original research, authoritative reviews, well-balanced commentary on significant articles, and expert opinion on new techniques and technologies. Radiology publishes cutting edge and impactful imaging research articles in radiology and medical imaging in order to help improve human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信