{"title":"Recommendations from Imaging, Oncology, and Radiology Organizations to Guide Management in Prostate Cancer: Summary of Current Recommendations.","authors":"Andy Mew, Eva Chau, Kaustav Bera, Nikhil Ramaiya, Sree Harsha Tirumani","doi":"10.1148/rycan.240091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prostate cancer is the second most common malignancy among male individuals in the United States and requires careful imaging approaches because of its varied presentations. This review examines prostate cancer imaging guidelines from leading organizations, including the American College of Radiology, American Urological Association, European Association of Urology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and serves as a reference highlighting commonalities and divergences in current imaging recommendations across prostate cancer states. We outline these organizations and their methods, focusing on their approaches to panel expertise, guideline development, evidence grading, and revision schedules. We then compare and contrast the role of various imaging modalities across states of prostate cancer management in the following categories: clinically suspected prostate cancer, clinically established prostate cancer: active surveillance or staging, monitoring metastatic disease, and posttreatment follow-up: recurrent or residual disease. Overall, there is consensus on the importance of multiparametric MRI in diagnosis and staging prior to active surveillance and the emerging role of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT in metastatic and recurrent disease. However, there is disparity in imaging recommendations for detecting metastases in unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer and views on current applications of PSMA PET/CT. Ultimately, variations in radiologic expertise exist among guideline panels, and there continue to be inconsistencies in imaging recommendations in prostate cancer. <b>Keywords:</b> Prostate, Genital/Reproductive, Oncology <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":20786,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","volume":"7 1","pages":"e240091"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11791666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.240091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the second most common malignancy among male individuals in the United States and requires careful imaging approaches because of its varied presentations. This review examines prostate cancer imaging guidelines from leading organizations, including the American College of Radiology, American Urological Association, European Association of Urology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and serves as a reference highlighting commonalities and divergences in current imaging recommendations across prostate cancer states. We outline these organizations and their methods, focusing on their approaches to panel expertise, guideline development, evidence grading, and revision schedules. We then compare and contrast the role of various imaging modalities across states of prostate cancer management in the following categories: clinically suspected prostate cancer, clinically established prostate cancer: active surveillance or staging, monitoring metastatic disease, and posttreatment follow-up: recurrent or residual disease. Overall, there is consensus on the importance of multiparametric MRI in diagnosis and staging prior to active surveillance and the emerging role of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT in metastatic and recurrent disease. However, there is disparity in imaging recommendations for detecting metastases in unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer and views on current applications of PSMA PET/CT. Ultimately, variations in radiologic expertise exist among guideline panels, and there continue to be inconsistencies in imaging recommendations in prostate cancer. Keywords: Prostate, Genital/Reproductive, Oncology Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2025.
影像、肿瘤学和放射学组织对指导前列腺癌管理的建议:当前建议摘要。
前列腺癌是美国男性中第二常见的恶性肿瘤,由于其表现多样,需要仔细的影像学检查。本综述研究了来自主要组织的前列腺癌成像指南,包括美国放射学会、美国泌尿学会、欧洲泌尿学会、美国临床肿瘤学会和国家综合癌症网络,并作为参考,强调了前列腺癌国家当前成像建议的共性和差异。我们概述了这些组织和他们的方法,重点是他们的专家组专家,指南制定,证据分级和修订时间表的方法。然后,我们比较和对比了各种成像方式在以下类别前列腺癌管理状态中的作用:临床疑似前列腺癌,临床确诊前列腺癌:主动监测或分期,监测转移性疾病,治疗后随访:复发或残留疾病。总的来说,在主动监测之前,多参数MRI在诊断和分期中的重要性以及前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA) PET/CT在转移性和复发性疾病中的新作用已经达成共识。然而,在检测不良中危前列腺癌转移的影像学建议和对PSMA PET/CT当前应用的看法存在差异。最终,各指南小组在放射学专业知识方面存在差异,并且在前列腺癌的影像学推荐方面仍然存在不一致。关键词:前列腺,生殖/生殖,肿瘤学本文有补充材料。©rsna, 2025。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。