Multicomponent telerehabilitation program for veterans with multimorbidity: A randomized controlled feasibility study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
PM&R Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13299
Michelle R Rauzi, Lauren M Abbate, Laura Churchill, Alexander J Garbin, Jeri E Forster, Cory L Christiansen, Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley
{"title":"Multicomponent telerehabilitation program for veterans with multimorbidity: A randomized controlled feasibility study.","authors":"Michelle R Rauzi, Lauren M Abbate, Laura Churchill, Alexander J Garbin, Jeri E Forster, Cory L Christiansen, Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older veterans with multimorbidity experience physical and social vulnerabilities that complicate receipt of and adherence to physical rehabilitation services. Thus, traditional physical rehabilitation programs are insufficient to address this population's heterogenous clinical presentation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a MultiComponent TeleRehabilitation (MCTR) program for older veterans with multimorbidity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled cross-over feasibility study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Telehealth from Veterans Affairs Medical Center to participants' homes.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Fifty U.S. military veterans, age ≥60 years (mean ± SD; 69.2 ± 6.7) with ≥3 comorbidities (6.0 ± 1.9), and impaired physical function were randomized and allocated equally to two groups.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The MCTR program consisted of high-intensity rehabilitation, coaching, social support, and technologies. Physical therapists delivered 12 individual and 20 group telerehabilitation sessions/participant. Participants in the education group started the MCTR program after 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was combined adherence (>75% of participants attending ≥80% sessions). Acceptability was measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Secondary outcomes included safety, participant surveys, and physical function. Patient-level outcomes were collected at baseline, 12 (primary time point), and 24 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 50 participants, 39 adhered to total session attendance (0.78 [95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.88], p = .76), 45 adhered to individual sessions (0.90 [95% confidence interval: 0.78-0.97], p = .01), and 48 rated the program as acceptable (0.96 [95% confidence interval: 0.85-0.99], p < .001). Thirty-five participants reported 78 safety events, and 12 (15%) had some degree of relatedness to the protocol. Most patient-level outcomes were similar between groups at 12-weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MCTR program was feasible based on high adherence to individual sessions and high acceptability. Adherence results were consistent with previous exercise studies in older adults. Most in-session safety events were related to underlying medical conditions and consistent with in-person physical rehabilitation safety events. These results can inform use of telerehabilitation for similar populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Older veterans with multimorbidity experience physical and social vulnerabilities that complicate receipt of and adherence to physical rehabilitation services. Thus, traditional physical rehabilitation programs are insufficient to address this population's heterogenous clinical presentation.

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a MultiComponent TeleRehabilitation (MCTR) program for older veterans with multimorbidity.

Design: Randomized controlled cross-over feasibility study.

Setting: Telehealth from Veterans Affairs Medical Center to participants' homes.

Participants: Fifty U.S. military veterans, age ≥60 years (mean ± SD; 69.2 ± 6.7) with ≥3 comorbidities (6.0 ± 1.9), and impaired physical function were randomized and allocated equally to two groups.

Intervention: The MCTR program consisted of high-intensity rehabilitation, coaching, social support, and technologies. Physical therapists delivered 12 individual and 20 group telerehabilitation sessions/participant. Participants in the education group started the MCTR program after 12 weeks.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was combined adherence (>75% of participants attending ≥80% sessions). Acceptability was measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Secondary outcomes included safety, participant surveys, and physical function. Patient-level outcomes were collected at baseline, 12 (primary time point), and 24 weeks.

Results: Of 50 participants, 39 adhered to total session attendance (0.78 [95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.88], p = .76), 45 adhered to individual sessions (0.90 [95% confidence interval: 0.78-0.97], p = .01), and 48 rated the program as acceptable (0.96 [95% confidence interval: 0.85-0.99], p < .001). Thirty-five participants reported 78 safety events, and 12 (15%) had some degree of relatedness to the protocol. Most patient-level outcomes were similar between groups at 12-weeks.

Conclusions: The MCTR program was feasible based on high adherence to individual sessions and high acceptability. Adherence results were consistent with previous exercise studies in older adults. Most in-session safety events were related to underlying medical conditions and consistent with in-person physical rehabilitation safety events. These results can inform use of telerehabilitation for similar populations.

多病退伍军人多组分远程康复计划:一项随机对照可行性研究。
背景:患有多种疾病的老年退伍军人经历身体和社会脆弱性,这使得接受和坚持身体康复服务变得复杂。因此,传统的物理康复方案不足以解决这一人群的异质临床表现。目的:探讨多组分远程康复(MCTR)方案对老年退伍军人多种疾病的可行性和可接受性。设计:随机对照交叉可行性研究。设置:从退伍军人事务医疗中心到参与者家中的远程医疗。参与者:50名美国退伍军人,年龄≥60岁(mean±SD;(69.2±6.7)例,合并症≥3例(6.0±1.9)例,身体功能受损者随机分为两组。干预:MCTR计划包括高强度康复、教练、社会支持和技术。物理治疗师提供了12个个人和20个小组远程康复课程/参与者。教育组的参与者在12周后开始MCTR项目。主要结局指标:主要结局指标为联合依从性(约75%的受试者参加≥80%的疗程)。可接受性采用干预措施可接受性来衡量。次要结局包括安全性、参与者调查和身体功能。在基线、12周(主要时间点)和24周收集患者水平的结果。结果:在50名参与者中,39人坚持参加总疗程(0.78[95%置信区间:0.64-0.88],p = 0.76), 45人坚持参加个别疗程(0.90[95%置信区间:0.78-0.97],p = 0.01), 48人认为计划是可接受的(0.96[95%置信区间:0.85-0.99],p结论:MCTR计划是可行的,基于对个别疗程的高依从性和高可接受性。坚持锻炼的结果与之前针对老年人的运动研究一致。大多数会期安全事件与潜在的医疗状况有关,与现场身体康复安全事件一致。这些结果可以为类似人群使用远程康复提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信